Effect of sevoflurane combined with intercostal block on postoperative pulmonary function, opioid consumption, and stress response in lung cancer surgery patients.
Yixin Wang, Lang Jin, Hongmei Shen, Chuanjie Zong, Jie Zhang
{"title":"Effect of sevoflurane combined with intercostal block on postoperative pulmonary function, opioid consumption, and stress response in lung cancer surgery patients.","authors":"Yixin Wang, Lang Jin, Hongmei Shen, Chuanjie Zong, Jie Zhang","doi":"10.62347/DESK9796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of sevoflurane combined with intercostal block in lung cancer surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on 252 patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the sevoflurane with intercostal block group (Group S, n = 108) and the propofol group (Group P, n = 144). Anesthesia protocols involved sevoflurane and intercostal nerve block or propofol. Postoperative pulmonary function, opioid consumption, stress response, and cognitive effects were compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The VAS scores were significantly lower in Group S at postoperative 2 h (1.96 ± 0.52 vs 2.15 ± 0.56, <i>P</i> = 0.005) and 24 h (3.84 ± 0.95 vs 4.14 ± 0.98, <i>P</i> = 0.015), indicating superior pain management. Group S also showed better preservation of lung function, with higher FEV1 values at postoperative 2 hours (1.49 ± 0.29 L vs 1.36 ± 0.65 L, <i>P</i> = 0.033) and 24 hours (1.59 ± 0.39 L vs 1.45 ± 0.45 L, <i>P</i> = 0.012). Opioid consumption was lower in Group S at both postoperative 24 h (1307.52 ± 259.41 µg vs 1742.26 ± 253.12 µg, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and 48 h. Cognitive function was better preserved immediately post-surgery in Group S (26.03 ± 4.42 vs 24.14 ± 5.28, <i>P</i> = 0.003). However, adverse reactions like nausea were more common in Group S (9.26% vs 2.78%, <i>P</i> = 0.026).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sevoflurane combined with intercostal block outperforms propofol in enhancing postoperative pulmonary function, reducing opioid reliance, and modulating stress responses in lung cancer surgery patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 4","pages":"1972-1985"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12070098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/DESK9796","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of sevoflurane combined with intercostal block in lung cancer surgery.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 252 patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups: the sevoflurane with intercostal block group (Group S, n = 108) and the propofol group (Group P, n = 144). Anesthesia protocols involved sevoflurane and intercostal nerve block or propofol. Postoperative pulmonary function, opioid consumption, stress response, and cognitive effects were compared between the two groups.
Results: The VAS scores were significantly lower in Group S at postoperative 2 h (1.96 ± 0.52 vs 2.15 ± 0.56, P = 0.005) and 24 h (3.84 ± 0.95 vs 4.14 ± 0.98, P = 0.015), indicating superior pain management. Group S also showed better preservation of lung function, with higher FEV1 values at postoperative 2 hours (1.49 ± 0.29 L vs 1.36 ± 0.65 L, P = 0.033) and 24 hours (1.59 ± 0.39 L vs 1.45 ± 0.45 L, P = 0.012). Opioid consumption was lower in Group S at both postoperative 24 h (1307.52 ± 259.41 µg vs 1742.26 ± 253.12 µg, P < 0.001) and 48 h. Cognitive function was better preserved immediately post-surgery in Group S (26.03 ± 4.42 vs 24.14 ± 5.28, P = 0.003). However, adverse reactions like nausea were more common in Group S (9.26% vs 2.78%, P = 0.026).
Conclusion: Sevoflurane combined with intercostal block outperforms propofol in enhancing postoperative pulmonary function, reducing opioid reliance, and modulating stress responses in lung cancer surgery patients.
目的:探讨七氟醚联合肋间阻滞在肺癌手术中的疗效。方法:对2020年1月至2023年12月期间接受肺癌手术的252例患者进行回顾性分析。患者分为七氟醚肋间阻滞组(S组,n = 108)和异丙酚组(P组,n = 144)。麻醉方案包括七氟醚和肋间神经阻滞或异丙酚。比较两组术后肺功能、阿片类药物消耗、应激反应和认知效果。结果:S组患者术后2 h(1.96±0.52 vs 2.15±0.56,P = 0.005)和24 h(3.84±0.95 vs 4.14±0.98,P = 0.015) VAS评分明显低于对照组(P = 0.015)。S组肺功能保存较好,术后2 h FEV1值较高(1.49±0.29 L vs 1.36±0.65 L, P = 0.033), 24 h FEV1值较高(1.59±0.39 L vs 1.45±0.45 L, P = 0.012)。S组在术后24 h(1307.52±259.41µg vs 1742.26±253.12µg, P < 0.001)和48 h的阿片类药物消耗均较低。S组在术后立即保持认知功能较好(26.03±4.42 vs 24.14±5.28,P = 0.003)。而恶心等不良反应在S组更为常见(9.26% vs 2.78%, P = 0.026)。结论:七氟醚联合肋间阻滞在改善肺癌手术患者术后肺功能、减少阿片类药物依赖和调节应激反应方面优于异丙酚。
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.