A severe dismantling of LGBTQI+ health equity and equality: impact of new U.S. policies on the global response to HIV

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
Sean Robert Cahill
{"title":"A severe dismantling of LGBTQI+ health equity and equality: impact of new U.S. policies on the global response to HIV","authors":"Sean Robert Cahill","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Since 20 January 2025, the new U.S. administration has deployed what is likely to be an illegal and unconstitutional “shock and awe” strategy to effectively dismantle entire government agencies that fund healthcare and humanitarian aid around the world, and to repeal policies and programmes supporting LGBTQI+ health equity and equality both in domestic and global policies. Although several executive orders target the so-called promotion of “gender ideology,” and transgender people in particular, U.S. agencies and private entities are overcomplying, even in the absence of rules and regulations requiring them to do so, ending programmes supporting LGBQTI+ individuals. This includes research on health disparities affecting LGBTQI+ people in the United States and around the world. Global programmes supporting LGBTQI+ communities, a key foreign policy goal of previous U.S. administrations, have been abruptly ended, leaving sexual and gender minority people even more vulnerable than they already were.</p><p>Specifically, on his first day in office, President Trump issued three executive orders that affect health equity in the United States. The first opposed alleged “gender ideology extremism” [<span>1</span>]. It defined sex as referring to “an individual's immutable biological classification as exclusively male and female,” and stated that “[a]gencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.” This has led to the defunding of hundreds of existing U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grants that included LGBTQI+ participants and HIV prevention and care research studies, and to new applications being abruptly removed from NIH consideration. It could also eventually restrict healthcare entities’ ability to provide gender-affirming care.</p><p>Executive orders related to “gender ideology extremism” [<span>2</span>] repealed a January 2021 executive order that prohibited discrimination by the federal government on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) [<span>3</span>]. The rescinding of SOGI non-discrimination under U.S. law could have a grave impact on the ability of LGBTQI+ people to find employment, earn an income, and access housing, healthcare and other public services. While the 2020 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in <i>Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia</i>, prohibits anti-gay and anti-transgender discrimination in employment nationwide [<span>4</span>], LGBTQI+ Americans continue to experience routine discrimination in many settings. A 2022 survey found that more than one-third of LGBTQI+ Americans reported experiencing discrimination in the past year. More than one in five respondents said that they delayed or avoided medical care due to experiences of discrimination [<span>5</span>].</p><p>A third executive order targeted Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives [<span>6</span>]. As a result of this EO, U.S. government agencies have removed information about racial and ethnic disparities from websites, and ordered the termination of many research studies examining such disparities, including HIV prevention research. While it will take months or even years to create and finalize rules and regulations to implement all of these executive orders, in response to them a number of government agencies and private entities have taken steps to roll back LGBTQI+ and racial equity health initiatives and access to care. For example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) removed information related to LGBTQI+ health and racial and ethnic disparities from its website, including peer-reviewed academic journal articles on these topics [<span>7</span>]. This action violates a number of U.S. laws, including the Public Health Service Act, which requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, of which CDC is a part, to “assemble accurate data to assess research priorities,” including “data on study populations of clinical research, funded by or conducted at each national research institute and national center” (<i>Id</i>. § 282(b)(4)(B)). In addition to the direct impact of these new U.S. policies, a number of private healthcare institutions have stopped providing gender-affirming care for youth, even though regulations to enforce the anti-transgender executive orders have not yet been finalized [<span>8</span>]. Perhaps most devastating for LGBTQI+ people around the world has been the near-total dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). As of 7 March 2025, nearly all of USAID's staff and contractors had been fired, and only one-tenth of its contracts were still in place [<span>9</span>].</p><p>Following its reauthorization in 2008, PEPFAR started supporting HIV prevention programmes for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women, both populations at elevated risk for HIV acquisition. It also started collecting data on these populations to understand their burden of HIV in Africa and elsewhere. Then Senator Joe Biden was Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair in 2008 when language calling on PEPFAR to address MSM was included in the reauthorization [<span>10</span>]. Under the Obama and Biden Administrations, promoting equal rights for LGBTQI+ people was a key goal of U.S. foreign policy. The Trump Administration has discontinued this approach and stopped funding LGBTQI+ organizations in other countries. Just days into his second term, President Trump ended all aid flowing through USAID. Secretary of State Marco Rubio then announced an exception for live-saving medical care such as HIV treatment, but not for groups that promote DEI or focus on LGBTQI+ people. As a result, about 97% of some 127 Ugandan organizations that conduct HIV prevention and care work with LGBTQI+ communities lost all of their USAID funding, and most have had to close operations [<span>11</span>]. This will have devastating effects on HIV prevention and care in Uganda and around the world, where gay and bisexual men and transgender women are disproportionately burdened by HIV and are subject to violence and persecution by other members of society and by governmental actors.</p><p>In January, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a programme that worked closely with USAID and CDC to prevent HIV and treat people living with HIV around the world, was put under a 90-day review by administration officials, and its fate is unknown. PEPFAR had a $6.5 billion budget in fiscal year 2024. Some $4.8 billion of this was “bilateral aid” that went directly to 55 countries; 60% flowed through USAID, and the rest went to the CDC and the U.S. Department of Defense. The remaining $1.7 billion went to the Global Fund to Fight HIV, AIDS and Malaria [<span>12</span>]. While most of the PEPFAR funding through USAID was stopped, the fate of the other funding is unclear. A recent analysis estimates that ending PEPFAR funding in South Africa alone, where PEPFAR funding constitutes 18% of the country's HIV budget, “would cause an additional 601,000 HIV-related deaths and 565,000 new HIV infections…over 10 years” [<span>13</span>].</p><p>While the current U.S. administration's regressive policies target “gender ideology” and DEI, they are having a much broader impact that is silencing and erasing research on health and disparities among LGBTQI+ people and among racial and ethnic minorities. The mass defunding of LGBTQI+-related programming supported by USAID and other U.S. government programmes, massive layoffs and funding cuts at CDC's Division of HIV Prevention and USAID, and the promotion of homophobic and transphobic policies will exacerbate HIV epidemics globally.</p><p>There are no competing interests.</p><p>SRC conceptualized and wrote this viewpoint article.</p><p>No funding supported the research or writing of this viewpoint article.</p><p>The views in this viewpoint article are those of the author alone and do not represent the views of The Fenway Institute, Boston University, Northeastern University or any of the other institutions with which Sean Robert Cahill is affiliated.</p>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"28 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26485","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26485","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 20 January 2025, the new U.S. administration has deployed what is likely to be an illegal and unconstitutional “shock and awe” strategy to effectively dismantle entire government agencies that fund healthcare and humanitarian aid around the world, and to repeal policies and programmes supporting LGBTQI+ health equity and equality both in domestic and global policies. Although several executive orders target the so-called promotion of “gender ideology,” and transgender people in particular, U.S. agencies and private entities are overcomplying, even in the absence of rules and regulations requiring them to do so, ending programmes supporting LGBQTI+ individuals. This includes research on health disparities affecting LGBTQI+ people in the United States and around the world. Global programmes supporting LGBTQI+ communities, a key foreign policy goal of previous U.S. administrations, have been abruptly ended, leaving sexual and gender minority people even more vulnerable than they already were.

Specifically, on his first day in office, President Trump issued three executive orders that affect health equity in the United States. The first opposed alleged “gender ideology extremism” [1]. It defined sex as referring to “an individual's immutable biological classification as exclusively male and female,” and stated that “[a]gencies shall take all necessary steps, as permitted by law, to end the Federal funding of gender ideology.” This has led to the defunding of hundreds of existing U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH) research grants that included LGBTQI+ participants and HIV prevention and care research studies, and to new applications being abruptly removed from NIH consideration. It could also eventually restrict healthcare entities’ ability to provide gender-affirming care.

Executive orders related to “gender ideology extremism” [2] repealed a January 2021 executive order that prohibited discrimination by the federal government on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) [3]. The rescinding of SOGI non-discrimination under U.S. law could have a grave impact on the ability of LGBTQI+ people to find employment, earn an income, and access housing, healthcare and other public services. While the 2020 U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, prohibits anti-gay and anti-transgender discrimination in employment nationwide [4], LGBTQI+ Americans continue to experience routine discrimination in many settings. A 2022 survey found that more than one-third of LGBTQI+ Americans reported experiencing discrimination in the past year. More than one in five respondents said that they delayed or avoided medical care due to experiences of discrimination [5].

A third executive order targeted Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives [6]. As a result of this EO, U.S. government agencies have removed information about racial and ethnic disparities from websites, and ordered the termination of many research studies examining such disparities, including HIV prevention research. While it will take months or even years to create and finalize rules and regulations to implement all of these executive orders, in response to them a number of government agencies and private entities have taken steps to roll back LGBTQI+ and racial equity health initiatives and access to care. For example, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) removed information related to LGBTQI+ health and racial and ethnic disparities from its website, including peer-reviewed academic journal articles on these topics [7]. This action violates a number of U.S. laws, including the Public Health Service Act, which requires the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, of which CDC is a part, to “assemble accurate data to assess research priorities,” including “data on study populations of clinical research, funded by or conducted at each national research institute and national center” (Id. § 282(b)(4)(B)). In addition to the direct impact of these new U.S. policies, a number of private healthcare institutions have stopped providing gender-affirming care for youth, even though regulations to enforce the anti-transgender executive orders have not yet been finalized [8]. Perhaps most devastating for LGBTQI+ people around the world has been the near-total dismantling of the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). As of 7 March 2025, nearly all of USAID's staff and contractors had been fired, and only one-tenth of its contracts were still in place [9].

Following its reauthorization in 2008, PEPFAR started supporting HIV prevention programmes for men who have sex with men (MSM) and transgender women, both populations at elevated risk for HIV acquisition. It also started collecting data on these populations to understand their burden of HIV in Africa and elsewhere. Then Senator Joe Biden was Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chair in 2008 when language calling on PEPFAR to address MSM was included in the reauthorization [10]. Under the Obama and Biden Administrations, promoting equal rights for LGBTQI+ people was a key goal of U.S. foreign policy. The Trump Administration has discontinued this approach and stopped funding LGBTQI+ organizations in other countries. Just days into his second term, President Trump ended all aid flowing through USAID. Secretary of State Marco Rubio then announced an exception for live-saving medical care such as HIV treatment, but not for groups that promote DEI or focus on LGBTQI+ people. As a result, about 97% of some 127 Ugandan organizations that conduct HIV prevention and care work with LGBTQI+ communities lost all of their USAID funding, and most have had to close operations [11]. This will have devastating effects on HIV prevention and care in Uganda and around the world, where gay and bisexual men and transgender women are disproportionately burdened by HIV and are subject to violence and persecution by other members of society and by governmental actors.

In January, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), a programme that worked closely with USAID and CDC to prevent HIV and treat people living with HIV around the world, was put under a 90-day review by administration officials, and its fate is unknown. PEPFAR had a $6.5 billion budget in fiscal year 2024. Some $4.8 billion of this was “bilateral aid” that went directly to 55 countries; 60% flowed through USAID, and the rest went to the CDC and the U.S. Department of Defense. The remaining $1.7 billion went to the Global Fund to Fight HIV, AIDS and Malaria [12]. While most of the PEPFAR funding through USAID was stopped, the fate of the other funding is unclear. A recent analysis estimates that ending PEPFAR funding in South Africa alone, where PEPFAR funding constitutes 18% of the country's HIV budget, “would cause an additional 601,000 HIV-related deaths and 565,000 new HIV infections…over 10 years” [13].

While the current U.S. administration's regressive policies target “gender ideology” and DEI, they are having a much broader impact that is silencing and erasing research on health and disparities among LGBTQI+ people and among racial and ethnic minorities. The mass defunding of LGBTQI+-related programming supported by USAID and other U.S. government programmes, massive layoffs and funding cuts at CDC's Division of HIV Prevention and USAID, and the promotion of homophobic and transphobic policies will exacerbate HIV epidemics globally.

There are no competing interests.

SRC conceptualized and wrote this viewpoint article.

No funding supported the research or writing of this viewpoint article.

The views in this viewpoint article are those of the author alone and do not represent the views of The Fenway Institute, Boston University, Northeastern University or any of the other institutions with which Sean Robert Cahill is affiliated.

LGBTQI+健康公平和平等的严重瓦解:美国新政策对全球艾滋病应对的影响
自2025年1月20日以来,美国新政府部署了可能是非法和违宪的“震慑”战略,有效地拆除了为世界各地的医疗保健和人道主义援助提供资金的整个政府机构,并在国内和全球政策中废除了支持LGBTQI+健康公平和平等的政策和方案。虽然有几项行政命令针对所谓的“性别意识形态”的推广,特别是跨性别者,但美国的机构和私人实体在没有规定要求他们这样做的情况下过度遵守,结束了支持LGBQTI+个人的项目。这包括对影响美国和世界各地LGBTQI+人群的健康差异的研究。支持LGBTQI+社区的全球项目,是前几届美国政府的一个重要外交政策目标,已经突然终止,使性少数群体和性别少数群体比以前更加脆弱。具体来说,特朗普总统在上任的第一天就发布了三项影响美国医疗公平的行政命令。第一个反对所谓的“性别意识形态极端主义”b[1]。它将性别定义为“个人不可改变的生理分类,只有男性和女性”,并指出“各机构应在法律允许的情况下采取一切必要措施,终止联邦政府对性别意识形态的资助。”这导致美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)现有的数百项研究经费被取消,其中包括LGBTQI+参与者和艾滋病毒预防和护理研究,新的申请也突然从NIH的考虑中删除。它还可能最终限制医疗机构提供性别确认护理的能力。与“性别意识形态极端主义”相关的行政命令废除了2021年1月禁止联邦政府基于性取向和性别认同歧视的行政命令。根据美国法律取消SOGI非歧视可能会对LGBTQI+人群找工作、赚取收入、获得住房、医疗保健和其他公共服务的能力产生严重影响。虽然2020年美国最高法院对佐治亚州博斯托克诉克莱顿县一案的裁决禁止在全国范围内对同性恋和跨性别者的就业歧视,但LGBTQI+美国人在许多情况下继续遭受常规歧视。2022年的一项调查发现,超过三分之一的LGBTQI+美国人报告在过去一年中遭受歧视。超过五分之一的受访者表示,由于经历过歧视,他们推迟或避免接受医疗服务。第三项行政命令的目标是多元化、公平和包容(DEI)计划。根据这项行政令,美国政府机构已从网站上删除了有关种族和民族差异的信息,并下令终止许多调查这种差异的研究,包括艾滋病毒预防研究。虽然制定和最终确定执行所有这些行政命令的规则和条例需要数月甚至数年的时间,但作为对这些命令的回应,许多政府机构和私营实体已采取措施,取消LGBTQI+和种族平等的健康倡议和获得医疗服务的机会。例如,美国疾病控制和预防中心(CDC)从其网站上删除了与LGBTQI+健康和种族和民族差异有关的信息,包括同行评审的学术期刊文章。这一行为违反了许多美国法律,包括《公共卫生服务法》,该法案要求美国卫生与公众服务部(CDC是其中的一部分)“收集准确的数据来评估研究重点”,包括“由每个国家研究机构和国家中心资助或进行的临床研究人群的数据”(Id. 11)。§282 (b) (4) (b))。除了这些美国新政策的直接影响外,许多私人医疗机构已经停止为年轻人提供性别确认护理,尽管执行反跨性别行政命令的法规尚未最终确定。对于世界各地的LGBTQI+人群来说,最具毁灭性的可能是美国国际开发署(USAID)几乎全部解散。截至2025年3月7日,几乎所有美国国际开发署的工作人员和承包商都被解雇,到目前为止,只有十分之一的合同仍然有效。在2008年重新获得授权后,总统防治艾滋病紧急救援计划开始支持针对男男性行为者(MSM)和变性妇女的艾滋病预防项目,这两个人群感染艾滋病毒的风险都很高。它还开始收集这些人群的数据,以了解他们在非洲和其他地方的艾滋病毒负担。 2008年,参议员乔·拜登担任参议院外交关系委员会主席,当时呼吁总统防治艾滋病紧急救援计划解决男同性恋行为的措辞被纳入了重新授权协议。在奥巴马和拜登政府时期,促进LGBTQI+人群的平等权利是美国外交政策的一个关键目标。特朗普政府已经停止了这种做法,并停止资助其他国家的LGBTQI+组织。就在他第二任期开始的几天,特朗普总统终止了所有通过美国国际开发署的援助。国务卿马可·卢比奥随后宣布了一项例外,适用于挽救生命的医疗护理,如艾滋病毒治疗,但不适用于促进DEI或关注LGBTQI+人群的团体。结果,在127个为LGBTQI+社区开展艾滋病预防和护理工作的乌干达组织中,约97%失去了美国国际开发署的全部资助,大多数组织不得不于2010年关闭业务。这将对乌干达和世界各地的艾滋病毒预防和护理产生毁灭性影响,在那里,男同性恋和双性恋男子以及变性妇女受到艾滋病毒的严重影响,并受到社会其他成员和政府行为者的暴力和迫害。今年1月,政府官员对总统艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)进行了为期90天的审查,该计划与美国国际开发署(USAID)和美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)密切合作,在世界各地预防艾滋病毒并治疗艾滋病毒感染者。PEPFAR在2024财年的预算为65亿美元。其中约48亿美元是直接向55个国家提供的“双边援助”;其中60%流向美国国际开发署,其余的流向美国疾病控制与预防中心和美国国防部。剩下的17亿美元捐给了全球抗击艾滋病毒、艾滋病和疟疾基金。虽然通过美国国际开发署提供的大部分PEPFAR资金已经停止,但其他资金的命运尚不清楚。最近的一项分析估计,仅在南非终止总统防治艾滋病紧急救援计划(PEPFAR)的资金就占该国艾滋病预算的18%,“将在10年内造成额外的601,000例艾滋病相关死亡和56.5万例新的艾滋病毒感染……”虽然美国现政府的倒退政策针对的是“性别意识形态”和DEI,但它们正在产生更广泛的影响,即沉默和消除对LGBTQI+人群和种族和少数民族之间的健康和差距的研究。美国国际开发署(USAID)和其他美国政府项目支持的LGBTQI+相关项目的大规模撤资,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)艾滋病预防部门和美国国际开发署(USAID)的大规模裁员和资金削减,以及恐同和恐跨性别政策的推广,将加剧全球艾滋病疫情。没有相互竞争的利益。SRC构思并撰写了这篇观点文章。没有资金支持这篇观点文章的研究或写作。本文观点仅代表作者个人观点,不代表芬威研究所、波士顿大学、东北大学或肖恩·罗伯特·卡希尔附属的任何其他机构的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信