Tension between the need for certainty and numerous uncertainties—A focus group study on various perspectives on a potential genomic newborn screening program in Germany

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Elena Sophia Doll, Julia Mahal, Karla Alex, Seraina Petra Lerch, Stefan Kölker, Christian P. Schaaf, Eva C. Winkler, Beate Ditzen
{"title":"Tension between the need for certainty and numerous uncertainties—A focus group study on various perspectives on a potential genomic newborn screening program in Germany","authors":"Elena Sophia Doll,&nbsp;Julia Mahal,&nbsp;Karla Alex,&nbsp;Seraina Petra Lerch,&nbsp;Stefan Kölker,&nbsp;Christian P. Schaaf,&nbsp;Eva C. Winkler,&nbsp;Beate Ditzen","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.70004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The advancement of genome sequencing technology and its potential application in newborn screening is being discussed in various countries. Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) can provide parents with information about their child's genetic susceptibility for known disorders. However, it also presents ethical and psychosocial challenges. This study was carried out with a view toward the possible introduction of gNBS in Germany. Due to the existing challenges, it is crucial to understand different perspectives of relevant groups in Germany before implementing gNBS. Four online focus groups were conducted with parents, patient representatives, and healthcare professionals to explore perceived opportunities and challenges, as well as needs regarding a potential gNBS program. Discussions with altogether 24 participants were semi-structured using a pre-defined interview guide. Sessions were audio-visually recorded and transcripts were analyzed using a structuring qualitative content analysis combining both deductive and inductive methods. Participants expressed positive views about gNBS but also reservations about a gNBS program and posed requirements for operating conditions. One salient theme that emerged was hope for certainty through gNBS in the face of numerous uncertainties. The study complements the perspective of patient representatives, providing further insight into the subject matter. This is a valuable contribution as they possess a comprehensive understanding of the medical, psychological, and ethical considerations involved. Patient representatives placed particular emphasis on the advantages of avoiding a diagnostic odyssey and the significance of support systems. The results provide first insights into different views on gNBS in Germany. These views can inform the potential preparation of a gNBS program in Germany, particularly with regard to information and consent requirements. Implications for practice, such as informing and educating parents about gNBS during pregnancy, can be derived from the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":"34 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jgc4.70004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jgc4.70004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The advancement of genome sequencing technology and its potential application in newborn screening is being discussed in various countries. Genomic newborn screening (gNBS) can provide parents with information about their child's genetic susceptibility for known disorders. However, it also presents ethical and psychosocial challenges. This study was carried out with a view toward the possible introduction of gNBS in Germany. Due to the existing challenges, it is crucial to understand different perspectives of relevant groups in Germany before implementing gNBS. Four online focus groups were conducted with parents, patient representatives, and healthcare professionals to explore perceived opportunities and challenges, as well as needs regarding a potential gNBS program. Discussions with altogether 24 participants were semi-structured using a pre-defined interview guide. Sessions were audio-visually recorded and transcripts were analyzed using a structuring qualitative content analysis combining both deductive and inductive methods. Participants expressed positive views about gNBS but also reservations about a gNBS program and posed requirements for operating conditions. One salient theme that emerged was hope for certainty through gNBS in the face of numerous uncertainties. The study complements the perspective of patient representatives, providing further insight into the subject matter. This is a valuable contribution as they possess a comprehensive understanding of the medical, psychological, and ethical considerations involved. Patient representatives placed particular emphasis on the advantages of avoiding a diagnostic odyssey and the significance of support systems. The results provide first insights into different views on gNBS in Germany. These views can inform the potential preparation of a gNBS program in Germany, particularly with regard to information and consent requirements. Implications for practice, such as informing and educating parents about gNBS during pregnancy, can be derived from the study.

Abstract Image

确定性需求与众多不确定性之间的紧张关系——一项针对德国潜在基因组新生儿筛查计划的不同观点的焦点小组研究
基因组测序技术的进步及其在新生儿筛查中的潜在应用正在各国进行讨论。新生儿基因组筛查(gNBS)可以为父母提供有关其孩子对已知疾病遗传易感性的信息。然而,它也带来了伦理和社会心理方面的挑战。这项研究是为了在德国可能引入gNBS而进行的。由于存在的挑战,在实施gNBS之前,了解德国相关群体的不同观点至关重要。与家长、患者代表和医疗保健专业人员进行了四个在线焦点小组讨论,以探讨潜在gNBS计划的机遇和挑战以及需求。共有24名参与者的讨论是半结构化的,使用了预先定义的访谈指南。对会议进行视听记录,并使用结合演绎和归纳方法的结构化定性内容分析进行分析。与会者对gNBS表达了积极的看法,但也对gNBS项目持保留态度,并对运行条件提出了要求。出现的一个突出主题是,面对众多不确定因素,希望通过gNBS获得确定性。该研究补充了患者代表的观点,为该主题提供了进一步的见解。这是一个有价值的贡献,因为他们对所涉及的医学、心理和伦理考虑有全面的了解。患者代表特别强调避免诊断过程冗长的优点和支持系统的重要性。研究结果首次揭示了对德国gNBS的不同看法。这些观点可以为德国gNBS计划的潜在准备提供信息,特别是在信息和同意要求方面。这项研究可以对实践产生影响,例如在怀孕期间向父母宣传和教育gNBS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信