A machine learning-based framework for seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete educational facilities

Q2 Engineering
Tapan Kumar, Mohammad Al Amin Siddique, Raquib Ahsan, Tanvir Mustafy
{"title":"A machine learning-based framework for seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete educational facilities","authors":"Tapan Kumar,&nbsp;Mohammad Al Amin Siddique,&nbsp;Raquib Ahsan,&nbsp;Tanvir Mustafy","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01332-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study presents the development of a machine learning (ML) based framework for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing educational reinforced concrete (RC) buildings under the jurisdiction of the Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK) in Dhaka. The conventional three major stages of assessment methods are often resource-intensive and time-consuming, especially when applied to large building stocks. The primary objective is to assess the seismic vulnerability of existing RC educational buildings in similar contexts using the ML method, focusing in predicting analytical parameters Story Shear Ratio (SSR) as a critical analytical risk indicator, implementing Rapid Visual Assessment (RVA) 8 parameters. The RVA parameters are construction year, building condition, number of stories, typical floor area, redundancy, pounding, plan irregularity and elevation irregularity, and corresponding building’s SSR value in the preliminary Engineering Assessment (PEA) survey. Three well-known ML models, including Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), were employed to predict SSR using RVA parameters. The dataset of 268 RC educational buildings was collected from the RAJUK. Based on the analysis, the SVR model obtained a higher coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.34 than the 0.17 and 0.16 of the RFR, and ANN models and 0.038, 0.04, and 0.04 for the Mean Square Error, respectively, though all models exhibited limited explanatory power for SSR. The findings reveals that the SVR handled comparatively well the complexities and nonlinearities in the dataset. This study proposes a cost-effective ML framework for seismic vulnerability assessment, with potential to support urban resilience efforts following further validation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 6","pages":"2605 - 2627"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01332-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents the development of a machine learning (ML) based framework for assessing the seismic vulnerability of existing educational reinforced concrete (RC) buildings under the jurisdiction of the Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK) in Dhaka. The conventional three major stages of assessment methods are often resource-intensive and time-consuming, especially when applied to large building stocks. The primary objective is to assess the seismic vulnerability of existing RC educational buildings in similar contexts using the ML method, focusing in predicting analytical parameters Story Shear Ratio (SSR) as a critical analytical risk indicator, implementing Rapid Visual Assessment (RVA) 8 parameters. The RVA parameters are construction year, building condition, number of stories, typical floor area, redundancy, pounding, plan irregularity and elevation irregularity, and corresponding building’s SSR value in the preliminary Engineering Assessment (PEA) survey. Three well-known ML models, including Support Vector Regression (SVR), Random Forest Regression (RFR), and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), were employed to predict SSR using RVA parameters. The dataset of 268 RC educational buildings was collected from the RAJUK. Based on the analysis, the SVR model obtained a higher coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.34 than the 0.17 and 0.16 of the RFR, and ANN models and 0.038, 0.04, and 0.04 for the Mean Square Error, respectively, though all models exhibited limited explanatory power for SSR. The findings reveals that the SVR handled comparatively well the complexities and nonlinearities in the dataset. This study proposes a cost-effective ML framework for seismic vulnerability assessment, with potential to support urban resilience efforts following further validation.

基于机器学习的钢筋混凝土教育设施地震易损性评估框架
本研究提出了一种基于机器学习(ML)的框架的开发,用于评估达卡Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK)管辖下的现有教育钢筋混凝土(RC)建筑的地震脆弱性。传统的评估方法的三个主要阶段往往是资源密集和耗时的,特别是在应用于大型建筑库存时。主要目标是使用ML方法评估类似环境下现有RC教育建筑的地震脆弱性,重点预测分析参数层剪比(SSR)作为关键的分析风险指标,实施快速视觉评估(RVA) 8参数。RVA参数为施工年份、建筑条件、层数、典型建筑面积、冗余度、冲击、平面不规则度和标高不规则度,以及相应建筑在初步工程评价(PEA)调查中的SSR值。采用支持向量回归(SVR)、随机森林回归(RFR)和人工神经网络(ANN) 3种著名的机器学习模型,利用RVA参数预测SSR。从RAJUK收集了268座RC教育建筑的数据集。分析表明,尽管所有模型对SSR的解释能力有限,但SVR模型的决定系数(R2)均为0.34,高于RFR和ANN模型的0.17和0.16,均方误差(Mean Square Error)分别为0.038、0.04和0.04。研究结果表明,SVR对数据集的复杂性和非线性处理较好。本研究提出了一个具有成本效益的地震易损性评估机器学习框架,在进一步验证后有可能支持城市韧性工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信