Head-and-neck cooling has a greater effect on motor performance in unpredictable tasks than in constant and predictable ones for men with multiple sclerosis: A randomized crossover study
Gintare Dauksaite , Nerijus Eimantas , Rima Solianik , Laura Daniuseviciute-Brazaite , Lina Malciene , Marius Brazaitis
{"title":"Head-and-neck cooling has a greater effect on motor performance in unpredictable tasks than in constant and predictable ones for men with multiple sclerosis: A randomized crossover study","authors":"Gintare Dauksaite , Nerijus Eimantas , Rima Solianik , Laura Daniuseviciute-Brazaite , Lina Malciene , Marius Brazaitis","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2025.106525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To determine the effects of different motor tasks (constant vs. predictable vs. unpredictable), as well as head-and-neck cooling, on central and peripheral fatigability, physiological-thermal stress, and motor system function in men with multiple sclerosis (MS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighteen male MS volunteers (aged 34.9 ± 8.1 years) were allocated to one of two groups: the head-and-neck cooling group (COLD) or the control group (CON), which received no thermal intervention. Each group participated in three exercise trials, each structured with variations in simulated contraction intensity (constant, predictable, and unpredictable), with at least one week between trials. The trials involved 100 intermittent isometric contraction tasks, targeting knee extensions at a 60° flexion angle. Fatiguing motor tasks involved 5-second contractions followed by 20-second rest periods. Key variables were assessed before, during, and after a 1-hour recovery period.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Head-and-neck cooling reduced central fatigability, improved perceived exertion, and elevated electromyography amplitude across all motor task strategies (p < 0.05). When combined with head-and-neck cooling, the unpredictable motor task induced greater modulation of central and peripheral motor performance variables than the constant and predictable ones. Additionally, predictable and unpredictable motor tasks caused greater peripheral fatigability than constant tasks in both the COLD and CON groups (p < 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>An unpredictable motor task combined with head-and-neck cooling enhances central activation of exercising muscles, leading to lower central fatigability and improved perceived exertion, while also inducing greater peripheral fatigability, as evidenced by reduced force generation and greater motor errors compared to constant and predictable ones in men with MS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 106525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034825002676","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To determine the effects of different motor tasks (constant vs. predictable vs. unpredictable), as well as head-and-neck cooling, on central and peripheral fatigability, physiological-thermal stress, and motor system function in men with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods
Eighteen male MS volunteers (aged 34.9 ± 8.1 years) were allocated to one of two groups: the head-and-neck cooling group (COLD) or the control group (CON), which received no thermal intervention. Each group participated in three exercise trials, each structured with variations in simulated contraction intensity (constant, predictable, and unpredictable), with at least one week between trials. The trials involved 100 intermittent isometric contraction tasks, targeting knee extensions at a 60° flexion angle. Fatiguing motor tasks involved 5-second contractions followed by 20-second rest periods. Key variables were assessed before, during, and after a 1-hour recovery period.
Results
Head-and-neck cooling reduced central fatigability, improved perceived exertion, and elevated electromyography amplitude across all motor task strategies (p < 0.05). When combined with head-and-neck cooling, the unpredictable motor task induced greater modulation of central and peripheral motor performance variables than the constant and predictable ones. Additionally, predictable and unpredictable motor tasks caused greater peripheral fatigability than constant tasks in both the COLD and CON groups (p < 0.05).
Conclusion
An unpredictable motor task combined with head-and-neck cooling enhances central activation of exercising muscles, leading to lower central fatigability and improved perceived exertion, while also inducing greater peripheral fatigability, as evidenced by reduced force generation and greater motor errors compared to constant and predictable ones in men with MS.
期刊介绍:
Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource.
A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.