Linking the social determinants of health and disease process using concept mapping in pre-clerkship problem-based learning courses: a pilot study

IF 1.2 Q3 PATHOLOGY
Kellie Mullany BS , Barbara Masi PhD , Jaya G. Yodh PhD , Imanni Sheppard PhD , Grace Park MD , Samar A. Hegazy MD, PhD, MEHP
{"title":"Linking the social determinants of health and disease process using concept mapping in pre-clerkship problem-based learning courses: a pilot study","authors":"Kellie Mullany BS ,&nbsp;Barbara Masi PhD ,&nbsp;Jaya G. Yodh PhD ,&nbsp;Imanni Sheppard PhD ,&nbsp;Grace Park MD ,&nbsp;Samar A. Hegazy MD, PhD, MEHP","doi":"10.1016/j.acpath.2025.100169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Social Determinants of Health significantly impact patient care, and understanding their role in the disease process and patient management is essential to high-quality healthcare. Several barriers exist to integrating social determinants of health into medical curricula, including the lack of consensus on evidence-based teaching methods. In this context, our study investigated the impact of integrating social determinants of health into pre-clerkship problem-based learning courses using concept mapping on the clinical problem-solving process. Fourteen pre-clerkship medical students voluntarily participated and were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The experimental group education intervention included two problem-based cases with social determinants of health-informed probes to promote linking those determinants to the disease process and develop a treatment plan using concept mapping. The control group participated in the same cases without the education intervention. Students in both groups completed post-session assignments that included two new cases, individual concept maps, and recorded reflections. Concept maps were scored using a scoring rubric. The scores of both groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney <em>U</em> test. Recorded reflections and concept maps were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis coding method. Quantitative data analysis showed that the experimental group received significantly higher scores than the control group. Qualitative data analysis highlighted substantial differences in clinical problem-solving approaches. The control group’s clinical reasoning approach focused mainly on the clinical aspects of the case. The experimental group followed a social determinants of health-informed clinical reasoning approach to patient-centered treatment plans with balanced therapeutic/nontherapeutic elements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":44927,"journal":{"name":"Academic Pathology","volume":"12 2","pages":"Article 100169"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2374289525000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Social Determinants of Health significantly impact patient care, and understanding their role in the disease process and patient management is essential to high-quality healthcare. Several barriers exist to integrating social determinants of health into medical curricula, including the lack of consensus on evidence-based teaching methods. In this context, our study investigated the impact of integrating social determinants of health into pre-clerkship problem-based learning courses using concept mapping on the clinical problem-solving process. Fourteen pre-clerkship medical students voluntarily participated and were randomly assigned to control and experimental groups. The experimental group education intervention included two problem-based cases with social determinants of health-informed probes to promote linking those determinants to the disease process and develop a treatment plan using concept mapping. The control group participated in the same cases without the education intervention. Students in both groups completed post-session assignments that included two new cases, individual concept maps, and recorded reflections. Concept maps were scored using a scoring rubric. The scores of both groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Recorded reflections and concept maps were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis coding method. Quantitative data analysis showed that the experimental group received significantly higher scores than the control group. Qualitative data analysis highlighted substantial differences in clinical problem-solving approaches. The control group’s clinical reasoning approach focused mainly on the clinical aspects of the case. The experimental group followed a social determinants of health-informed clinical reasoning approach to patient-centered treatment plans with balanced therapeutic/nontherapeutic elements.
在职前以问题为基础的学习课程中利用概念图将健康和疾病的社会决定因素联系起来:一项试点研究
健康的社会决定因素显著影响患者护理,了解他们在疾病过程和患者管理中的作用对高质量的医疗保健至关重要。在将健康的社会决定因素纳入医学课程方面存在若干障碍,包括对循证教学方法缺乏共识。在此背景下,我们的研究利用临床问题解决过程的概念映射,调查了将健康的社会决定因素纳入基于问题的实习前学习课程的影响。14名实习前医学生自愿参与,随机分为对照组和实验组。实验组教育干预包括两个基于问题的案例,其中涉及健康知情探针的社会决定因素,以促进将这些决定因素与疾病过程联系起来,并利用概念图制定治疗计划。对照组在没有教育干预的情况下参与相同的病例。两个小组的学生都完成了课后作业,包括两个新案例、个人概念图和反思记录。概念图使用计分表进行评分。使用Mann-Whitney U测试比较两组的得分。采用自反性主题分析编码方法对记录的反射和概念图进行分析。定量数据分析显示,实验组得分明显高于对照组。定性数据分析强调了临床解决问题方法的实质性差异。对照组的临床推理方法主要集中在病例的临床方面。实验组遵循健康知情的社会决定因素临床推理方法,以患者为中心,平衡治疗/非治疗元素的治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Pathology
Academic Pathology PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Pathology is an open access journal sponsored by the Association of Pathology Chairs, established to give voice to the innovations in leadership and management of academic departments of Pathology. These innovations may have impact across the breadth of pathology and laboratory medicine practice. Academic Pathology addresses methods for improving patient care (clinical informatics, genomic testing and data management, lab automation, electronic health record integration, and annotate biorepositories); best practices in inter-professional clinical partnerships; innovative pedagogical approaches to medical education and educational program evaluation in pathology; models for training academic pathologists and advancing academic career development; administrative and organizational models supporting the discipline; and leadership development in academic medical centers, health systems, and other relevant venues. Intended authorship and audiences for Academic Pathology are international and reach beyond academic pathology itself, including but not limited to healthcare providers, educators, researchers, and policy-makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信