{"title":"Neutronic and thermal performance analysis of advanced cladding materials for ACP-100 SMR","authors":"Md. Abidur Rahman Ishraq , Afroza Shelley , Md. Rashed Sardar","doi":"10.1016/j.nucengdes.2025.114142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study analyzes the impact of various cladding materials: silicon carbide (SiC), Iron-Chromium-Aluminum Alloy (FeCrAl), Titanium-Molybdenum-Zirconium Alloy (TMZ), and Austenitic Stainless Steel (Alloy 33) and thicknesses (from 100 to 1000 µm) on the neutronic and thermal performance of the ACP-100 small modular reactor (SMR). Zircaloy is used as the reference material for comparison. Computational simulations using the Monte Carlo code SERPENT and nuclear data library ENDF/B-VII.1 indicate that SiC achieves the highest effective multiplication factor (keff) (1.3096), a 0.65 % increase over Zircaloy, while Alloy 33 exhibits the lowest keff (1.1724), a 9.90 % decrease at beginning of life (BOL) for thickness of 570 μm. As cladding thickness increases from 100 to 1000 µm, keff decreases by 4 % for SiC, 5.2 % for Zircaloy, and 18.2 % for Alloy 33 at BOL due to higher thermal neutron absorption. SiC sustains a cycle length of over 900 effective full power days (EFPDs) at 100 μm, achieving 912 EFPDs at 570 μm. In contrast, Alloy 33 shows poor neutron economy, with the cycle length dropping to 200 EFPDs at 1000 μm. SiC and TMZ demonstrate superior thermal conductivity (122.0 W/m·K and 110.3 W/m·K), reducing the fuel temperature by ∼10 K. While thicker cladding improves structural integrity, it compromises thermal efficiency. A thickness of 570 µm provides an optimal balance between performance and durability. SiC emerges as the most promising alternative cladding material for the ACP-100 SMR and further studies are recommended to assess its long-term behavior under reactor conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19170,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","volume":"440 ","pages":"Article 114142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Engineering and Design","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002954932500319X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study analyzes the impact of various cladding materials: silicon carbide (SiC), Iron-Chromium-Aluminum Alloy (FeCrAl), Titanium-Molybdenum-Zirconium Alloy (TMZ), and Austenitic Stainless Steel (Alloy 33) and thicknesses (from 100 to 1000 µm) on the neutronic and thermal performance of the ACP-100 small modular reactor (SMR). Zircaloy is used as the reference material for comparison. Computational simulations using the Monte Carlo code SERPENT and nuclear data library ENDF/B-VII.1 indicate that SiC achieves the highest effective multiplication factor (keff) (1.3096), a 0.65 % increase over Zircaloy, while Alloy 33 exhibits the lowest keff (1.1724), a 9.90 % decrease at beginning of life (BOL) for thickness of 570 μm. As cladding thickness increases from 100 to 1000 µm, keff decreases by 4 % for SiC, 5.2 % for Zircaloy, and 18.2 % for Alloy 33 at BOL due to higher thermal neutron absorption. SiC sustains a cycle length of over 900 effective full power days (EFPDs) at 100 μm, achieving 912 EFPDs at 570 μm. In contrast, Alloy 33 shows poor neutron economy, with the cycle length dropping to 200 EFPDs at 1000 μm. SiC and TMZ demonstrate superior thermal conductivity (122.0 W/m·K and 110.3 W/m·K), reducing the fuel temperature by ∼10 K. While thicker cladding improves structural integrity, it compromises thermal efficiency. A thickness of 570 µm provides an optimal balance between performance and durability. SiC emerges as the most promising alternative cladding material for the ACP-100 SMR and further studies are recommended to assess its long-term behavior under reactor conditions.
期刊介绍:
Nuclear Engineering and Design covers the wide range of disciplines involved in the engineering, design, safety and construction of nuclear fission reactors. The Editors welcome papers both on applied and innovative aspects and developments in nuclear science and technology.
Fundamentals of Reactor Design include:
• Thermal-Hydraulics and Core Physics
• Safety Analysis, Risk Assessment (PSA)
• Structural and Mechanical Engineering
• Materials Science
• Fuel Behavior and Design
• Structural Plant Design
• Engineering of Reactor Components
• Experiments
Aspects beyond fundamentals of Reactor Design covered:
• Accident Mitigation Measures
• Reactor Control Systems
• Licensing Issues
• Safeguard Engineering
• Economy of Plants
• Reprocessing / Waste Disposal
• Applications of Nuclear Energy
• Maintenance
• Decommissioning
Papers on new reactor ideas and developments (Generation IV reactors) such as inherently safe modular HTRs, High Performance LWRs/HWRs and LMFBs/GFR will be considered; Actinide Burners, Accelerator Driven Systems, Energy Amplifiers and other special designs of power and research reactors and their applications are also encouraged.