Camaraderie: Profession-Specific Facilitated Small Groups to Improve Well-Being in Health Care

Megan Furnari MD , Sean P.M. Rice PhD , Alexis C. Jaggers BA , Abigail Lenhart MD , Marie V. Soller MD
{"title":"Camaraderie: Profession-Specific Facilitated Small Groups to Improve Well-Being in Health Care","authors":"Megan Furnari MD ,&nbsp;Sean P.M. Rice PhD ,&nbsp;Alexis C. Jaggers BA ,&nbsp;Abigail Lenhart MD ,&nbsp;Marie V. Soller MD","doi":"10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2025.100624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the impact of profession-specific small groups for physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and managers led by trained peer facilitators with the intention to improve aspects of well-being.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and Methods</h3><div>This is a single-center, pilot, nonrandomized control trial of the Camaraderie group intervention with employees at Oregon Health and Science University (N=151; intervention, n=89; control, n=62). The intervention condition included 8 groups of 10 to 12 participants and 2 facilitators. Groups met 6 times for a 1-hour virtual session during a 3-month period from March to May 2023. Each session had a theme and 2 prompts. Participants were surveyed prior to the first session, immediately after the 6 sessions, and then 3 months after the program concluded. Validated metrics assessed included burnout, belonging, job satisfaction, and perceived stress levels.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>After completing the 6 sessions, 72.5% of intervention participants reported attending 5 or 6 of the 6 sessions, and 86.0% rated the facilitation as above average or highest value. Belonging on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (strong agreement) had a statistically significant increase of +0.45 (mean change or difference-in-difference; <em>P</em>=.03), from baseline to postsession relative to the control group. Stress (Likert 0-4 [very often]) and depersonalization (Likert 0-6 [every day]) had a statistically significant decreases from baseline to postsession (−0.21; <em>P</em>=.04, and −0.70; <em>P</em>=.02, respectively), relative to the control. There were no effects on job satisfaction or emotional exhaustion and no maintenance effects at the 3-month survey.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Profession-specific facilitated virtual small groups provide a high-impact experience with a minimal time commitment and support the well-being and belonging of the health care workforce.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94132,"journal":{"name":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","volume":"9 3","pages":"Article 100624"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542454825000359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the impact of profession-specific small groups for physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers, and managers led by trained peer facilitators with the intention to improve aspects of well-being.

Participants and Methods

This is a single-center, pilot, nonrandomized control trial of the Camaraderie group intervention with employees at Oregon Health and Science University (N=151; intervention, n=89; control, n=62). The intervention condition included 8 groups of 10 to 12 participants and 2 facilitators. Groups met 6 times for a 1-hour virtual session during a 3-month period from March to May 2023. Each session had a theme and 2 prompts. Participants were surveyed prior to the first session, immediately after the 6 sessions, and then 3 months after the program concluded. Validated metrics assessed included burnout, belonging, job satisfaction, and perceived stress levels.

Results

After completing the 6 sessions, 72.5% of intervention participants reported attending 5 or 6 of the 6 sessions, and 86.0% rated the facilitation as above average or highest value. Belonging on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (strong agreement) had a statistically significant increase of +0.45 (mean change or difference-in-difference; P=.03), from baseline to postsession relative to the control group. Stress (Likert 0-4 [very often]) and depersonalization (Likert 0-6 [every day]) had a statistically significant decreases from baseline to postsession (−0.21; P=.04, and −0.70; P=.02, respectively), relative to the control. There were no effects on job satisfaction or emotional exhaustion and no maintenance effects at the 3-month survey.

Conclusion

Profession-specific facilitated virtual small groups provide a high-impact experience with a minimal time commitment and support the well-being and belonging of the health care workforce.
同志情谊:专业特定的促进小组,以改善健康保健
目的评估专业特定小组对医生、护士、高级实践提供者和管理人员的影响,这些小组由训练有素的同伴辅导员领导,旨在改善幸福感。参与者和方法本研究是一项单中心、先导、非随机对照试验,以俄勒冈健康与科学大学(Oregon Health and Science University)员工为研究对象(N=151;干预,n = 89;控制,n = 62)。干预条件包括8组,每组10 ~ 12名被试和2名辅导员。在2023年3月至5月的3个月期间,小组进行了6次1小时的虚拟会议。每个环节都有一个主题和2个提示。参与者分别在第一次训练前、第6次训练后和训练结束后3个月接受调查。评估的有效指标包括倦怠、归属感、工作满意度和感知压力水平。结果完成6个疗程后,72.5%的干预参与者报告参加了其中的5或6个疗程,86.0%的干预参与者认为促进程度高于平均水平或最高水平。属于李克特量表从1到5(强烈一致)有统计学上显著增加+0.45(平均变化或差异中的差异;P=.03),相对于对照组,从基线到治疗后。压力(李克特0-4[经常])和人格解体(李克特0-6[每天])从基线到会后有统计学意义上的显著下降(- 0.21;P =。04,−0.70;P =。分别为02),相对于对照。在为期3个月的调查中,对工作满意度或情绪耗竭没有影响,对维持也没有影响。结论:专业特定的虚拟小组以最少的时间投入提供了高影响力的体验,并支持卫生保健工作人员的福祉和归属感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes
Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes Surgery, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Public Health and Health Policy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信