Stroke Incidence Evolution in People With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: A 34-Year Follow-up of the Da Qing Diabetes Study

IF 14.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Diabetes Care Pub Date : 2025-05-15 DOI:10.2337/dc24-2675
Yanyan Chen, Jinping Wang, Xinxin Feng, Xin Qian, Siyao He, Qier An, Xiang Yin, Xuan Wang, Yali An, Qiuhong Gong, Shuhan Zhou, Hui Li, Xiuwei Zhai, Xiaoping Chen, Guangwei Li
{"title":"Stroke Incidence Evolution in People With Newly Diagnosed Diabetes and Impaired Glucose Tolerance: A 34-Year Follow-up of the Da Qing Diabetes Study","authors":"Yanyan Chen, Jinping Wang, Xinxin Feng, Xin Qian, Siyao He, Qier An, Xiang Yin, Xuan Wang, Yali An, Qiuhong Gong, Shuhan Zhou, Hui Li, Xiuwei Zhai, Xiaoping Chen, Guangwei Li","doi":"10.2337/dc24-2675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE To examine the incidence of stroke in Chinese adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (NDD), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) over a 34-year follow-up period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This cohort study included participants with NDD, IGT, and NGT initially identified in 1986 in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study who were followed up for 34 years. Patients with IGT were randomized into a 6-year lifestyle intervention or control group. The stroke incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) were determined across the three glucose-level groups. RESULTS Over 34 years, the cumulative stroke incidence in the NDD, IGT nonintervention, and IGT intervention groups were 65.4%, 62.8%, and 49.8%, respectively. The annual incidence in the NDD group was significantly higher than that in the NGT group (24.3 vs. 18.5 per 1,000 person-years), after adjusting for age and sex. After adjusting for risk factors, the risk of stroke was significantly higher in the NDD (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.46–2.21, P < 0.001), IGT nonintervention (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.11–2.07, P = 0.008), and IGT intervention (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17–1.63, P = 0.01) groups than in the NGT group. A reduced stroke risk was observed in the overall IGT intervention group compared with the NDD group (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.94, P = 0.009), especially in women (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47–0.88, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Over 34 years, ∼50% of Chinese adults with NDD and IGT experienced stroke. Further efforts in diabetes management and intervention are required.","PeriodicalId":11140,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes Care","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2337/dc24-2675","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To examine the incidence of stroke in Chinese adults with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (NDD), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and normal glucose tolerance (NGT) over a 34-year follow-up period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This cohort study included participants with NDD, IGT, and NGT initially identified in 1986 in the Da Qing Diabetes Prevention Study who were followed up for 34 years. Patients with IGT were randomized into a 6-year lifestyle intervention or control group. The stroke incidence and hazard ratios (HRs) were determined across the three glucose-level groups. RESULTS Over 34 years, the cumulative stroke incidence in the NDD, IGT nonintervention, and IGT intervention groups were 65.4%, 62.8%, and 49.8%, respectively. The annual incidence in the NDD group was significantly higher than that in the NGT group (24.3 vs. 18.5 per 1,000 person-years), after adjusting for age and sex. After adjusting for risk factors, the risk of stroke was significantly higher in the NDD (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.46–2.21, P < 0.001), IGT nonintervention (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.11–2.07, P = 0.008), and IGT intervention (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17–1.63, P = 0.01) groups than in the NGT group. A reduced stroke risk was observed in the overall IGT intervention group compared with the NDD group (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.94, P = 0.009), especially in women (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47–0.88, P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Over 34 years, ∼50% of Chinese adults with NDD and IGT experienced stroke. Further efforts in diabetes management and intervention are required.
新诊断糖尿病和糖耐量受损患者脑卒中发病率演变:大庆糖尿病34年随访研究
目的通过34年的随访,研究中国成人新诊断的2型糖尿病(NDD)、糖耐量受损(IGT)和糖耐量正常(NGT)患者脑卒中的发生率。研究设计和方法本队列研究纳入了1986年在大庆糖尿病预防研究中首次发现的NDD、IGT和NGT患者,随访34年。IGT患者被随机分为6年生活方式干预组和对照组。测定三个血糖水平组的脑卒中发生率和危险比(hr)。结果34年间,NDD组、IGT不干预组和IGT干预组脑卒中累计发生率分别为65.4%、62.8%和49.8%。在调整了年龄和性别后,NDD组的年发病率显著高于NGT组(24.3 vs 18.5 / 1000人年)。在调整了危险因素后,NDD组的卒中风险明显更高(HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.46-2.21, P <;IGT非干预组(HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.11-2.07, P = 0.008)和IGT干预组(HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.17-1.63, P = 0.01)的死亡率均高于NGT组。与NDD组相比,整体IGT干预组卒中风险降低(HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64 - 0.94, P = 0.009),尤其是女性(HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.88, P = 0.006)。结论:在34年的时间里,约50%的中国成人NDD和IGT患者经历过卒中。需要在糖尿病管理和干预方面作出进一步努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes Care
Diabetes Care 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
27.80
自引率
4.90%
发文量
449
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal's overarching mission can be captured by the simple word "Care," reflecting its commitment to enhancing patient well-being. Diabetes Care aims to support better patient care by addressing the comprehensive needs of healthcare professionals dedicated to managing diabetes. Diabetes Care serves as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, aiming to advance knowledge, foster research, and improve diabetes management. The journal publishes original research across various categories, including Clinical Care, Education, Nutrition, Psychosocial Research, Epidemiology, Health Services Research, Emerging Treatments and Technologies, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Cardiovascular and Metabolic Risk. Additionally, Diabetes Care features ADA statements, consensus reports, review articles, letters to the editor, and health/medical news, appealing to a diverse audience of physicians, researchers, psychologists, educators, and other healthcare professionals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信