Association of Predicted Visceral Fat Percentage With Dementia Risk in Older Adults: The Role of Genetic Risk and Lifestyle.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hao-Wen Chen,Shi-Ao Wang,Zheng-Yun Xu,Zhan-Hui Shao,Qi Zhong,Yan-Fei Wei,Bi-Fei Cao,Kuan Liu,Xian-Bo Wu
{"title":"Association of Predicted Visceral Fat Percentage With Dementia Risk in Older Adults: The Role of Genetic Risk and Lifestyle.","authors":"Hao-Wen Chen,Shi-Ao Wang,Zheng-Yun Xu,Zhan-Hui Shao,Qi Zhong,Yan-Fei Wei,Bi-Fei Cao,Kuan Liu,Xian-Bo Wu","doi":"10.1212/wnl.0000000000213630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES\r\nObesity is a modifiable dementia risk factor, but body mass index does not account for fat distribution, particularly visceral fat, which is more strongly linked to metabolic and cardiovascular health. Despite its relevance, research on visceral fat and dementia is limited, especially in large-scale prospective studies. The aim of this study was to assess the association between visceral fat and dementia risk, its interaction with genetic predisposition, and the impact of healthy lifestyle adherence.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nUsing data from the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort, we computed baseline, sex-specific visceral fat percentage (VFP), defined as the ratio of visceral fat mass to total body fat mass. Nonlinear associations between VFP and incident dementia were initially assessed using restricted cubic splines. The relationship between VFP and incident dementia was further examined using Cox proportional hazard models. In addition, stratified and interaction analyses were conducted to assess dementia incidence across VFP levels, lifestyle factors, and genetic risk.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThe study included 63,042 women (mean age: 63.96 years) and 74,001 men (64.20 years) aged 60 years and older from the UKB, with a median follow-up of 14.07 years for men and 14.09 years for women. During follow-up, 2,805 men and 1,893 women developed dementia. A U-shaped association between VFP and dementia risk was observed in both sexes. In men, each SD increase in VFP below the median value of 8.1% was associated with a reduced risk of dementia (HR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96), whereas above the median, the risk increased (1.06, 1.00-1.11). Similarly, in women, below the median VFP value of 3.1%, each SD increase was linked to a decreased dementia risk (0.89, 0.83-0.96), and above the median, the risk increased (1.14, 1.07-1.22). No significant interactions were found between VFP and genetic risk or lifestyle factors.\r\n\r\nDISCUSSION\r\nAmong nondemented, community-dwelling older Britons, atypical VFP was associated with higher dementia risk in both sexes. The lack of interaction between VFP and genetic risk highlights the complexity of dementia pathogenesis. In addition, a healthy lifestyle may mitigate the dementia risk associated with atypical VFP levels.","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"63 1","pages":"e213630"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000213630","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Obesity is a modifiable dementia risk factor, but body mass index does not account for fat distribution, particularly visceral fat, which is more strongly linked to metabolic and cardiovascular health. Despite its relevance, research on visceral fat and dementia is limited, especially in large-scale prospective studies. The aim of this study was to assess the association between visceral fat and dementia risk, its interaction with genetic predisposition, and the impact of healthy lifestyle adherence. METHODS Using data from the UK Biobank (UKB) cohort, we computed baseline, sex-specific visceral fat percentage (VFP), defined as the ratio of visceral fat mass to total body fat mass. Nonlinear associations between VFP and incident dementia were initially assessed using restricted cubic splines. The relationship between VFP and incident dementia was further examined using Cox proportional hazard models. In addition, stratified and interaction analyses were conducted to assess dementia incidence across VFP levels, lifestyle factors, and genetic risk. RESULTS The study included 63,042 women (mean age: 63.96 years) and 74,001 men (64.20 years) aged 60 years and older from the UKB, with a median follow-up of 14.07 years for men and 14.09 years for women. During follow-up, 2,805 men and 1,893 women developed dementia. A U-shaped association between VFP and dementia risk was observed in both sexes. In men, each SD increase in VFP below the median value of 8.1% was associated with a reduced risk of dementia (HR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96), whereas above the median, the risk increased (1.06, 1.00-1.11). Similarly, in women, below the median VFP value of 3.1%, each SD increase was linked to a decreased dementia risk (0.89, 0.83-0.96), and above the median, the risk increased (1.14, 1.07-1.22). No significant interactions were found between VFP and genetic risk or lifestyle factors. DISCUSSION Among nondemented, community-dwelling older Britons, atypical VFP was associated with higher dementia risk in both sexes. The lack of interaction between VFP and genetic risk highlights the complexity of dementia pathogenesis. In addition, a healthy lifestyle may mitigate the dementia risk associated with atypical VFP levels.
预测内脏脂肪百分比与老年人痴呆风险的关联:遗传风险和生活方式的作用。
背景和目的肥胖是一种可改变的痴呆危险因素,但体重指数并不能解释脂肪分布,尤其是内脏脂肪,而内脏脂肪与代谢和心血管健康的关系更密切。尽管其相关性,内脏脂肪和痴呆的研究是有限的,特别是在大规模的前瞻性研究。这项研究的目的是评估内脏脂肪和痴呆风险之间的关系,它与遗传易感性的相互作用,以及坚持健康生活方式的影响。方法使用来自英国生物银行(UKB)队列的数据,我们计算了基线,性别特异性内脏脂肪百分比(VFP),定义为内脏脂肪质量与全身脂肪质量的比率。VFP和痴呆之间的非线性关联最初用受限三次样条进行评估。使用Cox比例风险模型进一步检验VFP与痴呆的关系。此外,还进行了分层和相互作用分析,以评估不同VFP水平、生活方式因素和遗传风险的痴呆发病率。结果该研究包括来自英国60岁及以上的63042名女性(平均年龄:63.96岁)和74001名男性(64.20岁),男性中位随访时间为14.07年,女性中位随访时间为14.09年。在随访期间,2805名男性和1893名女性患上了痴呆症。在两性中都观察到VFP和痴呆风险之间的u型关联。在男性中,VFP每增加一个标准差,低于8.1%的中位数与痴呆风险降低相关(HR: 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.96),而高于中位数,风险增加(1.06,1.00-1.11)。同样,在女性中,VFP值低于中位数3.1%,每增加一个SD与痴呆风险降低有关(0.89,0.83-0.96),高于中位数,风险增加(1.14,1.07-1.22)。VFP与遗传风险或生活方式因素之间没有明显的相互作用。在无痴呆、居住在社区的英国老年人中,非典型VFP与两性较高的痴呆风险相关。VFP与遗传风险之间缺乏相互作用凸显了痴呆发病机制的复杂性。此外,健康的生活方式可以减轻与非典型VFP水平相关的痴呆风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信