Undocumented Dementia Diagnosis During Skilled Home Health Care: Prevalence and Associated Factors.

Julia G Burgdorf, Halima Amjad, Yolanda Barrón, Miriam Ryvicker
{"title":"Undocumented Dementia Diagnosis During Skilled Home Health Care: Prevalence and Associated Factors.","authors":"Julia G Burgdorf, Halima Amjad, Yolanda Barrón, Miriam Ryvicker","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Skilled home health (HH) is a critical source of clinical care for community-living older adults. One-third of HH patients have dementia, but poor information transfer may limit HH providers' awareness of dementia diagnosis. We determined the prevalence of undocumented dementia diagnosis among HH patients and associated care delivery patterns and clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Among a 2018 national sample of Medicare HH patients, we compared those (1) without diagnosed dementia, (2) with dementia documented during HH, (3) with dementia undocumented during HH. Dementia diagnosis was determined from the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File claims-based indicator and documentation was determined via HH clinical assessments (OASIS). We measured HH care delivery and outcomes from claims and assessment data. We fit multivariable negative binomial and logistic regression models to estimate associations of dementia status and documentation with outcomes, while adjusting for patient- and HH agency-level characteristics and clustering at the HH agency level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1,372,570 HH patients, 30% had diagnosed dementia. Among those with diagnosed dementia, most (69%) had this diagnosis go undocumented during HH. Compared to those with documented dementia, those with undocumented dementia had longer lengths of stay (+3.1 days; 95% CI: 6.4-7.1) and were more likely to receive physical therapy (aOR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.16-1.22) and less likely to receive social work (aOR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.80-0.84). Compared to those with documented dementia, those with undocumented dementia had higher odds of hospitalization (aOR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.17-1.24) and Emergency Department use (aOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11-1.17) and lower odds of discharge to self-care (aOR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.86-0.90). Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses stratifying by cognitive symptom severity, functional impairment, clinical severity, and referral source.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest that HH providers often lack pertinent information regarding patients' dementia status, and patients with undocumented dementia more often experience acute care utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19491","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Skilled home health (HH) is a critical source of clinical care for community-living older adults. One-third of HH patients have dementia, but poor information transfer may limit HH providers' awareness of dementia diagnosis. We determined the prevalence of undocumented dementia diagnosis among HH patients and associated care delivery patterns and clinical outcomes.

Methods: Among a 2018 national sample of Medicare HH patients, we compared those (1) without diagnosed dementia, (2) with dementia documented during HH, (3) with dementia undocumented during HH. Dementia diagnosis was determined from the Medicare Beneficiary Summary File claims-based indicator and documentation was determined via HH clinical assessments (OASIS). We measured HH care delivery and outcomes from claims and assessment data. We fit multivariable negative binomial and logistic regression models to estimate associations of dementia status and documentation with outcomes, while adjusting for patient- and HH agency-level characteristics and clustering at the HH agency level.

Results: Among 1,372,570 HH patients, 30% had diagnosed dementia. Among those with diagnosed dementia, most (69%) had this diagnosis go undocumented during HH. Compared to those with documented dementia, those with undocumented dementia had longer lengths of stay (+3.1 days; 95% CI: 6.4-7.1) and were more likely to receive physical therapy (aOR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.16-1.22) and less likely to receive social work (aOR: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.80-0.84). Compared to those with documented dementia, those with undocumented dementia had higher odds of hospitalization (aOR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.17-1.24) and Emergency Department use (aOR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.11-1.17) and lower odds of discharge to self-care (aOR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.86-0.90). Findings were robust to sensitivity analyses stratifying by cognitive symptom severity, functional impairment, clinical severity, and referral source.

Conclusions: Results suggest that HH providers often lack pertinent information regarding patients' dementia status, and patients with undocumented dementia more often experience acute care utilization.

在熟练的家庭卫生保健中未记录的痴呆诊断:患病率和相关因素。
背景:熟练的家庭健康(HH)是社区生活老年人临床护理的重要来源。三分之一的HH患者患有痴呆症,但信息传递不良可能会限制HH提供者对痴呆症诊断的认识。我们确定了HH患者中未记录痴呆诊断的患病率以及相关的护理模式和临床结果。方法:在2018年全国医疗保险HH患者样本中,我们比较了(1)未诊断为痴呆症的患者,(2)HH期间记录的痴呆症患者,(3)HH期间未记录的痴呆症患者。痴呆诊断是根据医疗保险受益人摘要文件索赔指标确定的,通过HH临床评估(OASIS)确定文件。我们从索赔和评估数据中测量了HH护理交付和结果。我们拟合多变量负二项和逻辑回归模型来估计痴呆状态和文献与结果的关联,同时调整患者和HH机构水平的特征和HH机构水平的聚类。结果:在1,372,570例HH患者中,30%诊断为痴呆。在诊断为痴呆症的患者中,大多数(69%)在HH期间没有记录这一诊断。与记录在案的痴呆症患者相比,记录在案的痴呆症患者的住院时间更长(+3.1天;95% CI: 6.4-7.1),更有可能接受物理治疗(aOR: 1.19;95% CI: 1.16-1.22),更不可能接受社会工作(aOR: 0.82;95% ci: 0.80-0.84)。与记录在案的痴呆患者相比,记录在案的痴呆患者住院的几率更高(aOR: 1.20;95% CI: 1.17-1.24)和急诊科使用(aOR: 1.14;95% CI: 1.11-1.17)和较低的自我护理出院几率(aOR: 0.88;95% ci: 0.86-0.90)。根据认知症状严重程度、功能损害、临床严重程度和转诊来源进行分层的敏感性分析结果是稳健的。结论:结果表明,HH提供者通常缺乏有关患者痴呆状态的相关信息,并且无证痴呆患者更常经历急性护理利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信