A service evaluation of virtual wards in Cornwall, UK.

Oxford open digital health Pub Date : 2025-04-14 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1093/oodh/oqaf008
Helen Lyndon, Tracey Viney, Vicki Slade
{"title":"A service evaluation of virtual wards in Cornwall, UK.","authors":"Helen Lyndon, Tracey Viney, Vicki Slade","doi":"10.1093/oodh/oqaf008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This service evaluation provides an overview of the virtual ward model in Cornwall, UK, and was implemented using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were conducted with virtual ward patients and clinicians and analysed using thematic analysis. A virtual ward is a digitally enabled service enabling people requiring hospital-level care to receive that care at home, either as an alternative to hospital admission or by facilitating an earlier discharge. Four themes emerged from the data: (i) Readiness for change: the virtual ward service was not embedded in existing health provision with scepticism and reluctance to refer to the virtual ward. (ii) Confidence and trust: due to system incompatibility issues, clinicians lost confidence and trust in the remote monitoring system; however, patients had high levels of trust in the virtual ward staff, increasing their confidence to remain at home. (iii) Digital challenges: using the monitoring equipment was challenging for some patients with issues of digital exclusion including understanding the technology and connection difficulties. (iv) Impact: despite the challenges, the virtual ward was highly valued by patients and supports person-centred care, offering a safe alternative to hospital admission. Virtual wards in Cornwall were rapidly implemented leading to some implementation barriers; nonetheless, the overwhelming response from patients demonstrated how they valued the virtual ward as a viable alternative to hospital admission and how the compassion and professionalism shown by the virtual ward clinicians made them feel safe and supported in their own homes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520498,"journal":{"name":"Oxford open digital health","volume":"3 ","pages":"oqaf008"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford open digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oodh/oqaf008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This service evaluation provides an overview of the virtual ward model in Cornwall, UK, and was implemented using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Interviews were conducted with virtual ward patients and clinicians and analysed using thematic analysis. A virtual ward is a digitally enabled service enabling people requiring hospital-level care to receive that care at home, either as an alternative to hospital admission or by facilitating an earlier discharge. Four themes emerged from the data: (i) Readiness for change: the virtual ward service was not embedded in existing health provision with scepticism and reluctance to refer to the virtual ward. (ii) Confidence and trust: due to system incompatibility issues, clinicians lost confidence and trust in the remote monitoring system; however, patients had high levels of trust in the virtual ward staff, increasing their confidence to remain at home. (iii) Digital challenges: using the monitoring equipment was challenging for some patients with issues of digital exclusion including understanding the technology and connection difficulties. (iv) Impact: despite the challenges, the virtual ward was highly valued by patients and supports person-centred care, offering a safe alternative to hospital admission. Virtual wards in Cornwall were rapidly implemented leading to some implementation barriers; nonetheless, the overwhelming response from patients demonstrated how they valued the virtual ward as a viable alternative to hospital admission and how the compassion and professionalism shown by the virtual ward clinicians made them feel safe and supported in their own homes.

英国康沃尔郡虚拟病房的服务评价。
该服务评估提供了英国康沃尔郡虚拟病房模型的概述,并使用实施研究统一框架(CFIR)实施。与虚拟病房患者和临床医生进行访谈,并使用主题分析进行分析。虚拟病房是一种数字化服务,使需要医院级护理的人能够在家中接受护理,作为住院治疗的替代方案,或促进提前出院。数据中出现了四个主题:(i)准备变革:虚拟病房服务没有嵌入到现有的保健服务中,人们持怀疑态度,不愿提及虚拟病房。(ii)信心和信任:由于系统不兼容问题,临床医生对远程监测系统失去信心和信任;然而,患者对虚拟病房工作人员的信任度很高,这增加了他们留在家里的信心。(三)数字挑战:使用监测设备对一些有数字排斥问题的患者具有挑战性,包括理解技术和连接困难。㈣影响:尽管存在挑战,但虚拟病房受到患者的高度重视,并支持以人为本的护理,为住院提供了一种安全的替代方案。康沃尔的虚拟病房迅速实施,导致一些实施障碍;尽管如此,来自患者的压倒性反应表明,他们如何重视虚拟病房作为住院治疗的可行替代方案,以及虚拟病房临床医生所表现出的同情心和专业精神如何使他们在自己的家中感到安全和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信