Psychometric properties of a culturally adapted Spanish version of the Attitudes Toward Genomics and Precision Medicine instrument.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Ella Anghel, María Pineros-Leano, Isabella R McDonald, Andrew A Dwyer
{"title":"Psychometric properties of a culturally adapted Spanish version of the Attitudes Toward Genomics and Precision Medicine instrument.","authors":"Ella Anghel, María Pineros-Leano, Isabella R McDonald, Andrew A Dwyer","doi":"10.1159/000546101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is evidence of growing racial and ethnic disparities in genomic healthcare and precision medicine. Validated survey instruments and measures are required to understand the needs of diverse populations to appropriately tailor person-centered approaches and end disparities in genomic healthcare and precision medicine.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to examine the psychometric properties of a culturally adapted Spanish version of the Attitudes Toward Genomics and Precision Medicine (AGPM). First, we culturally adapted the AGPM. We then conducted a web-based evaluation of the Spanish AGPM in a cohort of 486 individuals identifying as Hispanic to establish the Spanish version's reliability, factor structure, and measurement invariance relative to the English version. We also compared AGPM responses between Spanish- and English-speaking Hispanic individuals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Spanish version of the AGPM demonstrates robust internal consistency with Cronbach alpha ranging from 0.84-0.98 across domains. All AGPM items significantly loaded on their respective factor (p < 0.001). Configural, metric, strict, and residual invariance models all met absolute and relative fit criteria. Significant differences were observed between Spanish and English-speaking participants in some AGPM subscales.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Spanish version of the AGPM demonstrates sound psychometric properties and may be useful for informing culturally empowered approaches to genomic healthcare and precision medicine for people identifying as Hispanic.</p>","PeriodicalId":49650,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Genomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Genomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is evidence of growing racial and ethnic disparities in genomic healthcare and precision medicine. Validated survey instruments and measures are required to understand the needs of diverse populations to appropriately tailor person-centered approaches and end disparities in genomic healthcare and precision medicine.

Methods: We aimed to examine the psychometric properties of a culturally adapted Spanish version of the Attitudes Toward Genomics and Precision Medicine (AGPM). First, we culturally adapted the AGPM. We then conducted a web-based evaluation of the Spanish AGPM in a cohort of 486 individuals identifying as Hispanic to establish the Spanish version's reliability, factor structure, and measurement invariance relative to the English version. We also compared AGPM responses between Spanish- and English-speaking Hispanic individuals.

Results: The Spanish version of the AGPM demonstrates robust internal consistency with Cronbach alpha ranging from 0.84-0.98 across domains. All AGPM items significantly loaded on their respective factor (p < 0.001). Configural, metric, strict, and residual invariance models all met absolute and relative fit criteria. Significant differences were observed between Spanish and English-speaking participants in some AGPM subscales.

Conclusions: The Spanish version of the AGPM demonstrates sound psychometric properties and may be useful for informing culturally empowered approaches to genomic healthcare and precision medicine for people identifying as Hispanic.

对基因组学和精密医学仪器的态度的文化适应西班牙版的心理测量特性。
背景:有证据表明,在基因组保健和精准医学方面,种族和民族差异越来越大。需要有效的调查工具和措施来了解不同人群的需求,以适当地定制以人为本的方法,并结束基因组保健和精准医学的差异。方法:我们的目的是检查对基因组学和精准医学(AGPM)态度的文化适应西班牙语版本的心理测量特性。首先,我们对AGPM进行了文化调整。然后,我们对西班牙语AGPM进行了一项基于网络的评估,在486名西班牙裔个体中进行了评估,以建立西班牙语版本相对于英语版本的可靠性、因素结构和测量不变性。我们还比较了说西班牙语和说英语的西班牙人的AGPM反应。结果:西班牙语版本的AGPM与Cronbach alpha在0.84-0.98之间表现出强大的内部一致性。所有AGPM项目在其各自的因素上显著加载(p < 0.001)。配置、度量、严格和残差不变性模型都满足绝对和相对拟合标准。西班牙语和英语参与者在AGPM的一些子量表上观察到显著差异。结论:西班牙语版本的AGPM显示了良好的心理测量特性,可能有助于为西班牙裔人群提供基因保健和精准医学的文化授权方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Public Health Genomics
Public Health Genomics 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Public Health Genomics'' is the leading international journal focusing on the timely translation of genome-based knowledge and technologies into public health, health policies, and healthcare as a whole. This peer-reviewed journal is a bimonthly forum featuring original papers, reviews, short communications, and policy statements. It is supplemented by topic-specific issues providing a comprehensive, holistic and ''all-inclusive'' picture of the chosen subject. Multidisciplinary in scope, it combines theoretical and empirical work from a range of disciplines, notably public health, molecular and medical sciences, the humanities and social sciences. In so doing, it also takes into account rapid scientific advances from fields such as systems biology, microbiomics, epigenomics or information and communication technologies as well as the hight potential of ''big data'' for public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信