Barriers and facilitators for implementation of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Tanzania: a qualitative study among healthcare providers, stakeholders, and Tanzanian women.
IF 2.2 3区 医学Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators for implementation of HPV-based cervical cancer screening in Tanzania: a qualitative study among healthcare providers, stakeholders, and Tanzanian women.","authors":"Karen Grønlund Madsen, Julie Skipper Mosgaard, Martha Oshosen, Patricia Swai, Julius Mwaiselage, Vibeke Rasch, Ditte Søndergaard Linde","doi":"10.1080/16549716.2025.2491852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Tanzania and the most common form of cancer among Tanzanian women. Screening attendance remains among the lowest globally, necessitating improved attendance and screening methods.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to assess the feasibility of implementing the World Health Organization's 2021 hPV-based screening guideline in Tanzania by identifying potential barriers and facilitators to HPV-based screening among screening clients, healthcare providers, and stakeholders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2022 to February 2023, 25 semi-structured interviews were conducted with screening clients (<i>n</i> = 16) and healthcare providers and stakeholders (<i>n</i> = 9) in Moshi and Dar es Salaam. Data were analyzed using a deductive framework based on Bronfenbrenner's Social Ecological Model, supplemented with inductive subcategories from the transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Barriers and facilitators emerged across all levels of the Social Ecological Model. At the individual level, clinic-based screening and a one-visit approach were barriers, while HPV-self-sampling was a facilitator. Interpersonal barriers included limited social support, while referrals served as facilitators. Community-level barriers included fear and misconceptions, countered by facilitators such as increased awareness and health education. Health system challenges included restrictive age limits and urbanization of human resources, with uptake through other health services acted as a facilitator. Political barriers highlighted the need for a steady local supply chain, while cost reduction could serve as a facilitator for guideline implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>WHO's 2021 hPV-based screening guideline shows promise in Tanzania, but barriers such as clinic availability, fear, misconceptions, and supply chain issues must be addressed to ensure successful implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49197,"journal":{"name":"Global Health Action","volume":"18 1","pages":"2491852"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12024489/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Health Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2025.2491852","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in Tanzania and the most common form of cancer among Tanzanian women. Screening attendance remains among the lowest globally, necessitating improved attendance and screening methods.
Objective: This study aims to assess the feasibility of implementing the World Health Organization's 2021 hPV-based screening guideline in Tanzania by identifying potential barriers and facilitators to HPV-based screening among screening clients, healthcare providers, and stakeholders.
Methods: From October 2022 to February 2023, 25 semi-structured interviews were conducted with screening clients (n = 16) and healthcare providers and stakeholders (n = 9) in Moshi and Dar es Salaam. Data were analyzed using a deductive framework based on Bronfenbrenner's Social Ecological Model, supplemented with inductive subcategories from the transcripts.
Results: Barriers and facilitators emerged across all levels of the Social Ecological Model. At the individual level, clinic-based screening and a one-visit approach were barriers, while HPV-self-sampling was a facilitator. Interpersonal barriers included limited social support, while referrals served as facilitators. Community-level barriers included fear and misconceptions, countered by facilitators such as increased awareness and health education. Health system challenges included restrictive age limits and urbanization of human resources, with uptake through other health services acted as a facilitator. Political barriers highlighted the need for a steady local supply chain, while cost reduction could serve as a facilitator for guideline implementation.
Conclusion: WHO's 2021 hPV-based screening guideline shows promise in Tanzania, but barriers such as clinic availability, fear, misconceptions, and supply chain issues must be addressed to ensure successful implementation.
期刊介绍：
Global Health Action is an international peer-reviewed Open Access journal affiliated with the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine at Umeå University, Sweden. The Unit hosts the Umeå International School of Public Health and the Umeå Centre for Global Health Research.
Vision: Our vision is to be a leading journal in the global health field, narrowing health information gaps and contributing to the implementation of policies and actions that lead to improved global health.
Aim: The widening gap between the winners and losers of globalisation presents major public health challenges. To meet these challenges, it is crucial to generate new knowledge and evidence in the field and in settings where the evidence is lacking, as well as to bridge the gaps between existing knowledge and implementation of relevant findings. Thus, the aim of Global Health Action is to contribute to fuelling a more concrete, hands-on approach to addressing global health challenges. Manuscripts suggesting strategies for practical interventions and research implementations where none already exist are specifically welcomed. Further, the journal encourages articles from low- and middle-income countries, while also welcoming articles originated from South-South and South-North collaborations. All articles are expected to address a global agenda and include a strong implementation or policy component.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
