Safety and Efficacy of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Joint Osteoarthritis Associated Pain: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.7 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Nader Ashraf, Muhammad Junaid Tahir, Tarek Ziad Arabi, Bader Abou Shaar, Nadine Osman, Belal Nedal Sabbah, Yusra Mashkoor, Faheemullah Khan, Ali Asad, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Abderrahman Ouban, Zohaib Yousaf
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Genicular Artery Embolization for Knee Joint Osteoarthritis Associated Pain: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Nader Ashraf, Muhammad Junaid Tahir, Tarek Ziad Arabi, Bader Abou Shaar, Nadine Osman, Belal Nedal Sabbah, Yusra Mashkoor, Faheemullah Khan, Ali Asad, Muhammad Sohaib Asghar, Abderrahman Ouban, Zohaib Yousaf","doi":"10.1177/15266028251326770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To systematically review the literature on the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of genicular artery embolization (GAE) for knee joint osteoarthritis (OA) associated pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>After registering the protocol with the PROSPERO database, a search was conducted from inception until July 31, 2023, in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ScienceDirect databases to gather studies evaluating GAE's safety and efficacy in knee OA. A total of 4979 studies were identified and evaluated against the inclusion criteria. Data on study characteristics, success parameters, and adverse events were collected and synthesized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-three studies, primarily single-center prospective studies with a total of 657 patients, were included. Most studies reported a 100% technical success rates, except one study reporting a rate of 84.2%. Clinical success rates, defined variably across studies, ranged from 30% to 100%, depending on the study's follow-up period and outcome measures. The most frequent adverse events included skin discoloration without an ulcer (15.6%, n = 98) and transient post-procedural knee pain (10.2%, n = 64). Most studies were rated as fair in terms of quality, but the lack of robust randomized controlled trials highlighted the need for further comparative studies to standardize outcome reporting.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GAE appears to be a promising option for knee OA pain, particularly for patients unresponsive to conservative treatments or ineligible for surgery. High-quality studies are needed to confirm long-term effectiveness and standardize outcome measures.Clinical ImpactThis study highlights the safety and efficacy of genicular artery embolization as a minimally invasive treatment for knee osteoarthritis, particularly in patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatments or unsuitable for surgery. By targeting neovascularization and reducing inflammation, genicular artery embolization provides pain relief and functional improvement. Clinicians can consider genicular artery embolization as an alternative to surgery for mild-to-moderate OA, offering a lower adverse event rate and faster recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028251326770"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028251326770","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To systematically review the literature on the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of genicular artery embolization (GAE) for knee joint osteoarthritis (OA) associated pain.

Materials and methods: After registering the protocol with the PROSPERO database, a search was conducted from inception until July 31, 2023, in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ScienceDirect databases to gather studies evaluating GAE's safety and efficacy in knee OA. A total of 4979 studies were identified and evaluated against the inclusion criteria. Data on study characteristics, success parameters, and adverse events were collected and synthesized.

Results: Twenty-three studies, primarily single-center prospective studies with a total of 657 patients, were included. Most studies reported a 100% technical success rates, except one study reporting a rate of 84.2%. Clinical success rates, defined variably across studies, ranged from 30% to 100%, depending on the study's follow-up period and outcome measures. The most frequent adverse events included skin discoloration without an ulcer (15.6%, n = 98) and transient post-procedural knee pain (10.2%, n = 64). Most studies were rated as fair in terms of quality, but the lack of robust randomized controlled trials highlighted the need for further comparative studies to standardize outcome reporting.

Conclusion: GAE appears to be a promising option for knee OA pain, particularly for patients unresponsive to conservative treatments or ineligible for surgery. High-quality studies are needed to confirm long-term effectiveness and standardize outcome measures.Clinical ImpactThis study highlights the safety and efficacy of genicular artery embolization as a minimally invasive treatment for knee osteoarthritis, particularly in patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatments or unsuitable for surgery. By targeting neovascularization and reducing inflammation, genicular artery embolization provides pain relief and functional improvement. Clinicians can consider genicular artery embolization as an alternative to surgery for mild-to-moderate OA, offering a lower adverse event rate and faster recovery.

膝动脉栓塞治疗膝关节骨关节炎相关疼痛的安全性和有效性:一项系统综述。
目的:系统回顾膝动脉栓塞(GAE)治疗膝关节骨关节炎(OA)相关疼痛的有效性、安全性和长期结果的文献。材料和方法:在PROSPERO数据库注册方案后,检索MEDLINE、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库和ScienceDirect数据库,从方案开始到2023年7月31日,收集评估GAE在膝关节OA中的安全性和有效性的研究。根据纳入标准,共确定并评估了4979项研究。收集和综合研究特征、成功参数和不良事件的数据。结果:纳入了23项研究,主要是单中心前瞻性研究,共纳入657例患者。大多数研究报告了100%的技术成功率,除了一项研究报告了84.2%的成功率。临床成功率,在不同的研究中定义不同,范围从30%到100%,取决于研究的随访期和结果测量。最常见的不良事件包括无溃疡的皮肤变色(15.6%,n = 98)和术后一过性膝关节疼痛(10.2%,n = 64)。大多数研究在质量方面被评为公平,但缺乏可靠的随机对照试验,强调需要进一步的比较研究来标准化结果报告。结论:GAE似乎是膝关节OA疼痛的一个有希望的选择,特别是对保守治疗无反应或不适合手术的患者。需要高质量的研究来确认长期有效性和标准化结果测量。本研究强调了膝动脉栓塞作为微创治疗膝关节骨性关节炎的安全性和有效性,特别是对于那些对保守治疗无反应或不适合手术的患者。通过靶向新生血管和减少炎症,膝动脉栓塞提供疼痛缓解和功能改善。临床医生可以考虑膝动脉栓塞作为轻中度OA手术的替代方案,不良事件发生率更低,恢复更快。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信