Oncological Outcomes Following Computer-Aided Reconstructive Jaw Surgery.

IF 0.4 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction Pub Date : 2025-01-05 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.3390/cmtr18010008
John M Le, John Hofheins, Myra Rana, Jay Ponto, Anthony B Morlandt, Yedeh P Ying
{"title":"Oncological Outcomes Following Computer-Aided Reconstructive Jaw Surgery.","authors":"John M Le, John Hofheins, Myra Rana, Jay Ponto, Anthony B Morlandt, Yedeh P Ying","doi":"10.3390/cmtr18010008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to analyze computer-aided surgical planning (CAS) and margin status following oncological reconstructive surgery of the jaws. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent microvascular reconstructive surgery from 2014 to 2021. The predictor variable was the use of CAS. The primary and secondary outcomes were histopathological bone margin status, local recurrence, and disease-free survival (DFS). Covariates included demographic, operative, pathological, and clinical outcomes. Thirty-five CAS and fifty-two non-CAS subjects were included for analysis. Demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and comorbidities were comparable between the study groups, with all <i>p</i>-values > 0.05. For operative variables, the osteocutaneous radial forearm flap was more commonly used in the non-CAS group (34.6%) compared to the CAS group (2.9%) (<i>p</i> < 0.01). The mean follow-up period was shorter in the CAS group (31.9 months) than in the non-CAS group (42.6 months) (<i>p</i> < 0.01). CAS was not associated with margin status (<i>p</i> = 0.65) or local recurrence (<i>p</i> = 0.08). DFS was comparable between the study groups (<i>p</i> = 0.74). Bone margin involvement was not associated with any covariates. The use of CAS in oncological reconstructive jaw surgery was not associated with increased bone margin involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":"18 1","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995824/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cmtr18010008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze computer-aided surgical planning (CAS) and margin status following oncological reconstructive surgery of the jaws. A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent microvascular reconstructive surgery from 2014 to 2021. The predictor variable was the use of CAS. The primary and secondary outcomes were histopathological bone margin status, local recurrence, and disease-free survival (DFS). Covariates included demographic, operative, pathological, and clinical outcomes. Thirty-five CAS and fifty-two non-CAS subjects were included for analysis. Demographic characteristics such as age, sex, and comorbidities were comparable between the study groups, with all p-values > 0.05. For operative variables, the osteocutaneous radial forearm flap was more commonly used in the non-CAS group (34.6%) compared to the CAS group (2.9%) (p < 0.01). The mean follow-up period was shorter in the CAS group (31.9 months) than in the non-CAS group (42.6 months) (p < 0.01). CAS was not associated with margin status (p = 0.65) or local recurrence (p = 0.08). DFS was comparable between the study groups (p = 0.74). Bone margin involvement was not associated with any covariates. The use of CAS in oncological reconstructive jaw surgery was not associated with increased bone margin involvement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

计算机辅助颌骨重建手术后的肿瘤预后。
本研究的目的是分析颌骨肿瘤重建手术后的计算机辅助手术计划(CAS)和边缘状况。回顾性研究2014 - 2021年接受微血管重建手术的患者。预测变量为CAS的使用。主要和次要结果是组织病理学骨缘状态、局部复发和无病生存(DFS)。协变量包括人口统计学、手术、病理和临床结果。纳入35名CAS受试者和52名非CAS受试者进行分析。年龄、性别和合并症等人口统计学特征在研究组之间具有可比性,p值均为0.05。对于手术变量,骨皮前臂桡侧皮瓣在非CAS组(34.6%)较CAS组(2.9%)更常用(p < 0.01)。CAS组平均随访时间(31.9个月)短于非CAS组(42.6个月)(p < 0.01)。CAS与切缘状态(p = 0.65)或局部复发(p = 0.08)无关。各组间DFS具有可比性(p = 0.74)。骨缘受累与任何协变量无关。在肿瘤颌骨重建手术中使用CAS与骨缘受累增加无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信