Long-Term Outcomes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years.

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
JBJS Open Access Pub Date : 2025-05-01 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00025
Matthias Biner, Stafan Klotz, Octavian Andronic, Daniel C Karczewski, Lukas Zingg, Wieser Karl, Philipp Kriechling
{"title":"Long-Term Outcomes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review with a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years.","authors":"Matthias Biner, Stafan Klotz, Octavian Andronic, Daniel C Karczewski, Lukas Zingg, Wieser Karl, Philipp Kriechling","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a crucial intervention for restoring shoulder function and alleviating pain. The aim of this review was to evaluate long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of rTSA patients with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases until September 2024. Studies in English or German with a minimum 10-year follow-up were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024558828).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 673 studies, 7 retrospective case series with Level IV evidence met the inclusion criteria, totaling 469 rTSA procedures in 460 patients. The weighted mean age was 71 years, with 63% female patients. The mean follow-up was 12 years, with a 63% lost to follow-up. Four studies conducted all follow-ups in a clinical setting, while 3 used either outpatient visits (20 to 41%) or phone/mail interviews. The weighted mean reported revision-free implant survivorship reported in 5 studies was 88% at 10 years. Overall, the complication rate was 36% with need for further revision in 23% of patients. The revisions were primarily due to infection (8%), instability (7%), and glenoidal complications (3%). Significant functional improvements were noted across all studies. The absolute Constant score (CS) improved from 27 to 62 across 5 studies, and the relative CS improved from 37% preoperatively to 81% across 3 studies. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score improved from 35 to 74 (p < 0.001) and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation from 23 to 73 (p < 0.001), in 1 study each. The Subjective Shoulder Value increased from 28% to 79% (p = 0.001) in 2 studies. Weighted mean range of motion improvements included active abduction of 54°, active anterior elevation of 52°, and active external rotation of 8°. Longitudinal outcomes were reported to be stable in the due course in 5 studies and deteriorated in 1. Scapular notching varied widely, with Nerot-Sirveaux grades I and II in 15% to 59% of cases, and grades III and IV in 7% to 47%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>RTSA appears to provide substantial long-term improvements in shoulder function, clinical outcomes, and pain relief, albeit with significant complication and revision rates. However, caution is warranted when interpreting the data due to high lost-to-follow-up rates and limited data quality in the contemporary literature. Long-term registry data will be essential.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":36492,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Open Access","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039979/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Open Access","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA) is a crucial intervention for restoring shoulder function and alleviating pain. The aim of this review was to evaluate long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of rTSA patients with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines across PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane databases until September 2024. Studies in English or German with a minimum 10-year follow-up were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies criteria. The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024558828).

Results: Of 673 studies, 7 retrospective case series with Level IV evidence met the inclusion criteria, totaling 469 rTSA procedures in 460 patients. The weighted mean age was 71 years, with 63% female patients. The mean follow-up was 12 years, with a 63% lost to follow-up. Four studies conducted all follow-ups in a clinical setting, while 3 used either outpatient visits (20 to 41%) or phone/mail interviews. The weighted mean reported revision-free implant survivorship reported in 5 studies was 88% at 10 years. Overall, the complication rate was 36% with need for further revision in 23% of patients. The revisions were primarily due to infection (8%), instability (7%), and glenoidal complications (3%). Significant functional improvements were noted across all studies. The absolute Constant score (CS) improved from 27 to 62 across 5 studies, and the relative CS improved from 37% preoperatively to 81% across 3 studies. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score improved from 35 to 74 (p < 0.001) and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation from 23 to 73 (p < 0.001), in 1 study each. The Subjective Shoulder Value increased from 28% to 79% (p = 0.001) in 2 studies. Weighted mean range of motion improvements included active abduction of 54°, active anterior elevation of 52°, and active external rotation of 8°. Longitudinal outcomes were reported to be stable in the due course in 5 studies and deteriorated in 1. Scapular notching varied widely, with Nerot-Sirveaux grades I and II in 15% to 59% of cases, and grades III and IV in 7% to 47%.

Conclusion: RTSA appears to provide substantial long-term improvements in shoulder function, clinical outcomes, and pain relief, albeit with significant complication and revision rates. However, caution is warranted when interpreting the data due to high lost-to-follow-up rates and limited data quality in the contemporary literature. Long-term registry data will be essential.

Level of evidence: Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

反向全肩关节置换术后的长期疗效:一项至少随访10年的系统综述。
背景:反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)是恢复肩关节功能和减轻疼痛的重要干预措施。本综述的目的是评估rTSA患者至少随访10年的长期临床和放射学结果。方法:根据PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane数据库的系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行系统评价,直至2024年9月。纳入了至少随访10年的英语或德语研究。使用非随机研究的方法学指数标准评估偏倚风险。该研究已在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024558828)。结果:在673项研究中,有7个具有四级证据的回顾性病例系列符合纳入标准,共460例患者的469例rTSA手术。加权平均年龄71岁,女性占63%。平均随访时间为12年,随访损失63%。四项研究在临床环境中进行了所有随访,而三项研究使用门诊就诊(20%至41%)或电话/邮件访谈。5项研究报告的加权平均无修复种植体10年生存率为88%。总体而言,并发症发生率为36%,23%的患者需要进一步翻修。翻修主要是由于感染(8%)、不稳定(7%)和肩胛并发症(3%)。在所有研究中都注意到显著的功能改善。5项研究的绝对恒定评分(CS)从27分提高到62分,3项研究的相对CS从术前37%提高到81%。美国肩关节外科医生评分从35分提高到74分(p < 0.001),单次评估数值评价从23分提高到73分(p < 0.001)。在2项研究中,主观肩值从28%增加到79% (p = 0.001)。加权平均活动范围改善包括主动外展54°,主动前向上52°,主动外旋8°。据报道,纵向结果在5项研究中稳定,在1项研究中恶化。肩胛骨切口差异很大,Nerot-Sirveaux分级为I级和II级的病例占15%至59%,III级和IV级的病例占7%至47%。结论:RTSA似乎在肩功能、临床结果和疼痛缓解方面提供了实质性的长期改善,尽管有明显的并发症和翻修率。然而,由于当代文献中高失访率和有限的数据质量,在解释数据时需要谨慎。长期的注册数据将是必不可少的。证据等级:IV级。参见《作者说明》获得证据等级的完整描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Open Access
JBJS Open Access Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信