Virtual Reality Training Improves Procedural Skills in Mannequin-Based Simulation in Medical Students: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Ryan M Knobovitch, Junko Tokuno, Fabio Botelho, Howard B Fried, Tamara E Carver, Gerald M Fried
{"title":"Virtual Reality Training Improves Procedural Skills in Mannequin-Based Simulation in Medical Students: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Ryan M Knobovitch, Junko Tokuno, Fabio Botelho, Howard B Fried, Tamara E Carver, Gerald M Fried","doi":"10.1177/15533506251334693","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to evaluate whether immersive virtual reality (VR) training used in conjunction with interactive online learning improved procedural skills in medical students, using chest tube insertion as a model.MethodsMedical students (n = 30) with limited or no experience with chest tube insertion were randomized into control and VR groups. All participants received access to a previously developed online module to learn the equipment and steps involved in performing chest tube insertion. The VR group received additional training using commercially available software. All participants were then asked to perform chest tube insertion on a standardized mannequin. Technical skills were assessed by surgical experts, blinded to the group allocation, using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) rating scale (11-items, each scored 1-5). Multiple-choice tests and a 5-point Likert-scale were used to assess theoretical knowledge and to rate confidence level before and after training. Data are presented as median and interquartile range.ResultsAfter training, all participants showed significant improvement in knowledge from baseline; rate of correct answers was 50% pre-training [40.0-66.7]; 80% post-training [73.0-93.3]; <i>P</i> < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in knowledge before and after training. The VR group spent <60 min in VR training and had better procedural performance (OSATS scores: controls: 39 [33-45]; VR: 46 [42.0-50]; <i>P</i> = 0.03) and higher confidence (controls: 3 [3-4]; VR: 4 [4-5]; <i>P</i> = 0.002).ConclusionsAdding VR simulation to online learning improved technical skills and confidence in medical students learning chest tube insertion.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251334693"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251334693","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesThe goal of this study was to evaluate whether immersive virtual reality (VR) training used in conjunction with interactive online learning improved procedural skills in medical students, using chest tube insertion as a model.MethodsMedical students (n = 30) with limited or no experience with chest tube insertion were randomized into control and VR groups. All participants received access to a previously developed online module to learn the equipment and steps involved in performing chest tube insertion. The VR group received additional training using commercially available software. All participants were then asked to perform chest tube insertion on a standardized mannequin. Technical skills were assessed by surgical experts, blinded to the group allocation, using a modified Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill (OSATS) rating scale (11-items, each scored 1-5). Multiple-choice tests and a 5-point Likert-scale were used to assess theoretical knowledge and to rate confidence level before and after training. Data are presented as median and interquartile range.ResultsAfter training, all participants showed significant improvement in knowledge from baseline; rate of correct answers was 50% pre-training [40.0-66.7]; 80% post-training [73.0-93.3]; P < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in knowledge before and after training. The VR group spent <60 min in VR training and had better procedural performance (OSATS scores: controls: 39 [33-45]; VR: 46 [42.0-50]; P = 0.03) and higher confidence (controls: 3 [3-4]; VR: 4 [4-5]; P = 0.002).ConclusionsAdding VR simulation to online learning improved technical skills and confidence in medical students learning chest tube insertion.

虚拟现实训练提高医学生基于人体模型模拟的程序技能:一项试点随机对照试验。
目的本研究的目的是评估沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)培训与交互式在线学习相结合是否能提高医学生的操作技能,以胸管插入为模型。方法将30名胸管插入经验有限或无经验的医学生随机分为对照组和VR组。所有参与者都可以访问先前开发的在线模块,以学习执行胸管插入的设备和步骤。虚拟现实组使用商用软件接受了额外的培训。然后,所有参与者都被要求在一个标准化的人体模型上进行胸管插入。技术技能由外科专家评估,不知道分组分配,使用改进的客观结构化技术技能评估(OSATS)评定量表(11个项目,每个项目得分1-5)。采用多项选择测验和李克特5分量表对理论知识进行评估,并对培训前后的信心水平进行评分。数据以中位数和四分位数范围表示。结果培训后,所有参与者的知识水平均较基线有显著提高;训练前正确率为50% [40.0 ~ 66.7];80%培训后[73.0-93.3];P < 0.0001)。两组在训练前后的知识水平差异无统计学意义。VR组花费P = 0.03),置信度更高(对照组:3 [3-4];Vr: 4 [4-5];P = 0.002)。结论将虚拟现实技术应用于在线学习,提高了医学生学习胸管插入术的技能和信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信