Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows' Procedural Experiences During Training.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-06 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003377
Elizabeth D Moran, Deborah Hsu, Mary Wisbon, Elizabeth A Camp, Ellen Duncan, Alaa Elkarim, Aimee Baer Ellington, Danielle Graff, Karen A Mangold, Katherine McVety, Joshua Nagler, Lina Patel, Selin T Sagalowsky, Amy D Thompson, Tien T Vu, Cheryl Yang, Esther M Sampayo
{"title":"Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellows' Procedural Experiences During Training.","authors":"Elizabeth D Moran, Deborah Hsu, Mary Wisbon, Elizabeth A Camp, Ellen Duncan, Alaa Elkarim, Aimee Baer Ellington, Danielle Graff, Karen A Mangold, Katherine McVety, Joshua Nagler, Lina Patel, Selin T Sagalowsky, Amy D Thompson, Tien T Vu, Cheryl Yang, Esther M Sampayo","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) fellows are expected to perform many procedures during their fellowship, but they often have limited opportunities to practice rare procedures. The number of procedures required to achieve competence remains unclear; however, research suggests that increased practice correlates with skill development. The objective of this study is to quantify the frequency of procedures performed by fellows. Also, we describe how programs currently track their trainees' experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional, descriptive study exploring procedures performed by PEM fellows enrolled in ACGME-accredited programs between July 2019 and June 2020. Fellow and program demographics were collected. We analyzed procedural tracking collected through self-reported logs and documentation within the electronic medical record. In addition, we explored how programs currently track these experiences. Procedures were standardized based on the ACGME list of required procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven fellowship programs submitted the self-reported procedure logs of 104 fellows. Of those, 2 sites reported electronic medical record-based logs. The most frequently documented procedures included medical and trauma resuscitations, procedural sedations, and intubations. The most infrequently reported were nasal packing for nosebleeds and cardiac pacing. Most participating programs tracked experiences through fellow self-report and many offer opportunities for faculty to assess competence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PEM fellows do not consistently report performing all ACGME-required procedures during the fellowship. In addition, there is significant variation in how fellowship programs track trainees' procedural experiences. This study may inform the development of supplemental educational curricula and the potential revision of the ACGME list of required procedures. Future research could focus on assessing procedural competence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"566-572"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003377","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pediatric Emergency Medicine (PEM) fellows are expected to perform many procedures during their fellowship, but they often have limited opportunities to practice rare procedures. The number of procedures required to achieve competence remains unclear; however, research suggests that increased practice correlates with skill development. The objective of this study is to quantify the frequency of procedures performed by fellows. Also, we describe how programs currently track their trainees' experiences.

Methods: This was a retrospective, multicenter, cross-sectional, descriptive study exploring procedures performed by PEM fellows enrolled in ACGME-accredited programs between July 2019 and June 2020. Fellow and program demographics were collected. We analyzed procedural tracking collected through self-reported logs and documentation within the electronic medical record. In addition, we explored how programs currently track these experiences. Procedures were standardized based on the ACGME list of required procedures.

Results: Eleven fellowship programs submitted the self-reported procedure logs of 104 fellows. Of those, 2 sites reported electronic medical record-based logs. The most frequently documented procedures included medical and trauma resuscitations, procedural sedations, and intubations. The most infrequently reported were nasal packing for nosebleeds and cardiac pacing. Most participating programs tracked experiences through fellow self-report and many offer opportunities for faculty to assess competence.

Conclusions: PEM fellows do not consistently report performing all ACGME-required procedures during the fellowship. In addition, there is significant variation in how fellowship programs track trainees' procedural experiences. This study may inform the development of supplemental educational curricula and the potential revision of the ACGME list of required procedures. Future research could focus on assessing procedural competence.

儿科急诊医师培训过程中的程序经验。
简介:儿科急诊医学(PEM)研究员在他们的研究期间被期望执行许多程序,但他们通常有有限的机会实践罕见的程序。获得权限所需的程序数量仍不清楚;然而,研究表明,增加练习与技能发展有关。本研究的目的是量化研究员进行手术的频率。此外,我们还描述了项目目前如何跟踪受训者的经历。方法:这是一项回顾性、多中心、横断面、描述性研究,探讨了2019年7月至2020年6月期间参加acgme认证项目的PEM研究员的治疗过程。收集了研究人员和项目的人口统计数据。我们分析了通过电子医疗记录中的自我报告日志和文档收集的程序跟踪。此外,我们还探讨了当前程序如何跟踪这些经验。程序根据ACGME所需程序清单进行标准化。结果:11个奖学金项目提交了104名研究员的自我报告过程日志。其中,2个网站报告了基于电子病历的日志。最常见的记录程序包括医疗和创伤复苏、程序性镇静和插管。最不常见的报道是鼻填充物治疗鼻血和心脏起搏。大多数参与项目都通过学员自我报告来追踪经验,许多项目还为教师提供评估能力的机会。结论:PEM研究员在研究期间并没有一致地报告执行了所有acgme要求的程序。此外,在奖学金项目如何跟踪受训者的程序性经验方面也存在显著差异。这项研究可能为补充教育课程的发展和可能修订的ACGME所需程序清单提供信息。未来的研究可以集中在程序能力的评估上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信