{"title":"Particle Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Registry Study, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Masashi Mizumoto, Kei Shibuya, Kazuki Terashima, Masao Murakami, Motohiro Murakami, Yoshiyuki Shioyama, Yoshiro Matsuo, Takashi Ogino, Tatsuya Ohno, Takahiro Waki, Hiroyuki Ogino, Hiroyasu Tamamura, Norio Katoh, Masaru Wakatsuki, Tomoaki Okimoto, Motohisa Suzuki, Takashi Saito, Shingo Toyama, Takayuki Hashimoto, Hisateru Ohba, Shoji Kubo, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Kazushi Maruo, Hideyuki Sakurai","doi":"10.1159/000540291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>A prospective study was started in May 2016 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle therapy for intrahepatic cholangial carcinoma (ICC). To compare treatment modalities, we also conducted a meta-analysis of literature data and a systematic comparison using registry data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who received particle therapy for ICC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered. Nineteen manuscripts (4 particle therapy, 8 3D-CRT, 7 SBRT) were selected for the meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 85 cases (proton beam therapy 59, carbon therapy 26) were registered. The median overall survival (OS) of the 85 patients was 22.1 months (95% CI: 12.9-31.3); the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were 70.9% (95% CI: 61.1-80.7%), 47.6% (36.8-58.4%), 37.7% (26.7-48.7%), and 22.7% (10.2-35.2%), respectively; and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year local recurrence rates were 8.2% (1.1-15.3%), 21.6% (9.3-33.9%), 33.4% (16.7-50.1%), and 33.4% (16.7-50.1%), respectively. In the meta-analysis and registry data, the 1-year OS for particle therapy, SBRT and 3D-CRT were 71.8% (95% CI: 64.6-77.8%), 59.2% (53.0-64.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.0573), and 47.2% (36.8-56.9%, <i>p</i> = 0.0004), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher late non-hematological toxicity in the meta-analysis and registry data were 7.4-12% for particle therapy, 6.7-16.7% for SBRT, and 8.1-14.3% for 3D-CRT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Particle therapy achieved a good therapeutic effect for ICC, and a meta-analysis indicated that particle therapy is a better treatment modality than SBRT and 3D-CRT.</p>","PeriodicalId":18156,"journal":{"name":"Liver Cancer","volume":"14 2","pages":"211-222"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12005709/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000540291","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: A prospective study was started in May 2016 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle therapy for intrahepatic cholangial carcinoma (ICC). To compare treatment modalities, we also conducted a meta-analysis of literature data and a systematic comparison using registry data.
Methods: Patients who received particle therapy for ICC from May 2016 to June 2018 were registered. Nineteen manuscripts (4 particle therapy, 8 3D-CRT, 7 SBRT) were selected for the meta-analysis.
Results: A total of 85 cases (proton beam therapy 59, carbon therapy 26) were registered. The median overall survival (OS) of the 85 patients was 22.1 months (95% CI: 12.9-31.3); the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year OS rates were 70.9% (95% CI: 61.1-80.7%), 47.6% (36.8-58.4%), 37.7% (26.7-48.7%), and 22.7% (10.2-35.2%), respectively; and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year local recurrence rates were 8.2% (1.1-15.3%), 21.6% (9.3-33.9%), 33.4% (16.7-50.1%), and 33.4% (16.7-50.1%), respectively. In the meta-analysis and registry data, the 1-year OS for particle therapy, SBRT and 3D-CRT were 71.8% (95% CI: 64.6-77.8%), 59.2% (53.0-64.9%, p = 0.0573), and 47.2% (36.8-56.9%, p = 0.0004), respectively. The incidence of grade 3 or higher late non-hematological toxicity in the meta-analysis and registry data were 7.4-12% for particle therapy, 6.7-16.7% for SBRT, and 8.1-14.3% for 3D-CRT.
Conclusions: Particle therapy achieved a good therapeutic effect for ICC, and a meta-analysis indicated that particle therapy is a better treatment modality than SBRT and 3D-CRT.
期刊介绍:
Liver Cancer is a journal that serves the international community of researchers and clinicians by providing a platform for research results related to the causes, mechanisms, and therapy of liver cancer. It focuses on molecular carcinogenesis, prevention, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment, including molecular targeted therapy. The journal publishes clinical and translational research in the field of liver cancer in both humans and experimental models. It publishes original and review articles and has an Impact Factor of 13.8. The journal is indexed and abstracted in various platforms including PubMed, PubMed Central, Web of Science, Science Citation Index, Science Citation Index Expanded, Google Scholar, DOAJ, Chemical Abstracts Service, Scopus, Embase, Pathway Studio, and WorldCat.