Validation of the Reflux Symptom Index in French-Speaking Quebec Patients.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Jennifer A Silver, Antonia Lagos-Villaseca, Gabriella Le Blanc, Jonathan Primiani, Raisa Chowdhury, Jonathan Young, Karen M Kost
{"title":"Validation of the Reflux Symptom Index in French-Speaking Quebec Patients.","authors":"Jennifer A Silver, Antonia Lagos-Villaseca, Gabriella Le Blanc, Jonathan Primiani, Raisa Chowdhury, Jonathan Young, Karen M Kost","doi":"10.1177/19160216251333357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ImportanceThere is a need to culturally adapt this commonly used patient-reported outcome measure, the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), for use in Canada and Quebec's French population.ObjectiveTo translate and validate the RSI for use in Quebec French speakers, ensuring reliability and validity within this population.DesignProspective case-control study.SettingVoice and Dysphagia Laboratory at the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ParticipantsPatients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and healthy controls were recruited during outpatient clinical laryngology visits. Participants were eligible if they were at least 18 years old and spoke French as their native language.Intervention or ExposuresA Quebec-French version of the RSI (Q-Fr-RSI) was validated using the \"translation-back-translation\" method. Participants completed the Q-Fr-RSI, Fr-VHI, and their laryngoscopy was examined and assigned a Reflux Finding Score at their initial visit. Participants repeated the Q-Fr-RSI via telephone follow-up.Main Outcome MeasuresFeasibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the Q-Fr-RSI were assessed.ResultsEighty-nine participants were recruited: 49 patients within the experimental group and 40 subjects within the control group. The feasibility was evaluated as percentage of missing answers in the full sample at the first time point, 0%, and second time point, 1.2%. Internal consistency via Cronbach's alpha was high (.90). Intra-rater reliability via intraclass correlation demonstrated good level of agreement (.84). Internal validity demonstrated a strongly significant difference between the groups' answers (mean score of 23.9 vs 6.65, respectively, <i>P</i> < .001).ConclusionsThis data suggest that the Q-Fr-RSI can be used to assess LPR in the French-speaking Canadian population.RelevanceIn the bilingual country of Canada, and especially in the province of Quebec where over 90% of people speak French, an appropriate validation of the Q-Fr-RSI allows all patients to be monitored adequately. A Quebec-French patient-reported outcome measure can accurately represent these patients in future research studies utilizing these metrics.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":"54 ","pages":"19160216251333357"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12062638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216251333357","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ImportanceThere is a need to culturally adapt this commonly used patient-reported outcome measure, the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), for use in Canada and Quebec's French population.ObjectiveTo translate and validate the RSI for use in Quebec French speakers, ensuring reliability and validity within this population.DesignProspective case-control study.SettingVoice and Dysphagia Laboratory at the McGill University Health Centre in Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ParticipantsPatients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and healthy controls were recruited during outpatient clinical laryngology visits. Participants were eligible if they were at least 18 years old and spoke French as their native language.Intervention or ExposuresA Quebec-French version of the RSI (Q-Fr-RSI) was validated using the "translation-back-translation" method. Participants completed the Q-Fr-RSI, Fr-VHI, and their laryngoscopy was examined and assigned a Reflux Finding Score at their initial visit. Participants repeated the Q-Fr-RSI via telephone follow-up.Main Outcome MeasuresFeasibility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the Q-Fr-RSI were assessed.ResultsEighty-nine participants were recruited: 49 patients within the experimental group and 40 subjects within the control group. The feasibility was evaluated as percentage of missing answers in the full sample at the first time point, 0%, and second time point, 1.2%. Internal consistency via Cronbach's alpha was high (.90). Intra-rater reliability via intraclass correlation demonstrated good level of agreement (.84). Internal validity demonstrated a strongly significant difference between the groups' answers (mean score of 23.9 vs 6.65, respectively, P < .001).ConclusionsThis data suggest that the Q-Fr-RSI can be used to assess LPR in the French-speaking Canadian population.RelevanceIn the bilingual country of Canada, and especially in the province of Quebec where over 90% of people speak French, an appropriate validation of the Q-Fr-RSI allows all patients to be monitored adequately. A Quebec-French patient-reported outcome measure can accurately represent these patients in future research studies utilizing these metrics.

法语魁北克省患者反流症状指数的验证
在加拿大和魁北克省的法国人群中,有必要在文化上适应这种常用的患者报告的结果测量,即反流症状指数(RSI)。目的翻译和验证在魁北克法语人群中使用的RSI,确保该人群的信度和效度。前瞻性病例对照研究。加拿大魁北克省蒙特利尔麦吉尔大学健康中心的声音和吞咽困难实验室。参与者:在门诊临床喉科就诊期间招募喉咽反流(LPR)患者和健康对照者。参与者必须年满18岁,母语为法语。干预或暴露使用“翻译-反翻译”方法验证魁北克-法语版本的RSI (Q-Fr-RSI)。参与者完成了Q-Fr-RSI, Fr-VHI,他们的喉镜检查并在首次就诊时分配了反流发现评分。参与者通过电话随访重复了q - r- rsi。评估Q-Fr-RSI的可行性、内部一致性、重测信度和结构效度。结果共纳入89例受试者,实验组49例,对照组40例。可行性评估为在第一个时间点全样本中缺失答案的百分比为0%,第二个时间点为1.2%。通过Cronbach's alpha测定的内部一致性较高(0.90)。通过类内相关性得出的组内信度显示出良好的一致性(0.84)。内部效度显示两组答案之间存在显著差异(平均得分分别为23.9分和6.65分)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信