Johann Mourier, Taryn S. Murray, Robert J. Lennox, Kim Birnie-Gauvin
{"title":"Advances in telemetry approaches and technologies applied to fish ecology and management","authors":"Johann Mourier, Taryn S. Murray, Robert J. Lennox, Kim Birnie-Gauvin","doi":"10.1111/jfb.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Telemetry and biologging have been key tools in fish ecology for several decades (Hussey et al., <span>2015</span>; Matley et al., <span>2022</span>; Watanabe & Papastamatiou, <span>2023</span>) and helped uncover several mysteries within this realm, including migrations, behaviour, activity and space use, intra- and interspecific interactions or human impacts. The technology has remarkably improved since its first application, allowing us to monitor smaller-sized fish for longer periods. Sensors on board tags add additional capacity to measure internal and external properties of the tagged fish, such as their temperature, depth and acceleration. In addition, the analytical tools and approaches to infer fish movement and behaviour derived from telemetry data have considerably advanced to allow complex and high-dimensional spatial and temporal analyses.</p><p>There is a global community of fish-tracking scientists who use animal tracking tools to address applied and fundamental questions about fish populations in every ocean of the world and scores of inland waters. The Sixth International Conference on Fish Telemetry gathered many of these scientists in Sète, France, from 11 to 16 June 2023, providing the opportunity to share the latest advances in telemetry approaches and technologies for studying movement ecology of fish and for fisheries management. The present collection of papers is representative of the current trends in fish ecology studied through the prism of biologging and telemetry, with 11 (41%) papers focused on marine systems, 7 (26%) on freshwater systems and 9 (33%) addressing both systems (i.e., estuary or transitions between rivers and sea).</p><p>This special issue offers readers a wide range of approaches and tagging methods applied to dive deeper into a fish's movement ecology. Although the more common tagging methods provided new insights into fish ecology with acoustic telemetry determining the large-scale migrations of rays in a regional network of receivers (Elston et al., <span>2025</span>) and pop-up archival satellite tags providing the first long-term migration route of sunfish (<i>Mola mola</i> L.) in the Mediterranean Sea (Rouyer et al., <span>2025a</span>), other developing tools were also applied. For example, data-storage tags were used in combination with acoustic telemetry to study connectivity of pollack (<i>Pollachius pollachius</i>) in the French-English Channel (Gonse et al., <span>2025</span>). In addition, several approaches were proposed to study predation in fish, including acoustic tags with acceleration sensors to map the dynamics of shark activity and its associated predation pressure on prey (Laurioux et al., <span>2025</span>) or the test and use of predation tags in several case studies: brown trout (<i>Salmo trutta</i> L.; Kennedy et al., <span>2025</span>), largemouth bass (<i>Micropterus nigricans</i>; Shorgan et al., <span>2025</span>) and salmon (<i>Salmo salar</i>; Waters et al., <span>2025</span>). More well-established sensors, such as depth and temperature sensors, integrated into acoustic tags were also used to investigate environmental preferences and niche partitioning of fish (Nickel et al., <span>2025</span>). Depth sensors integrated into positioning systems allow the incorporation of the vertical dimension of fish activity by building more accurate three-dimensional habitat use models (Richter et al., <span>2025</span>). Finally, heart-rate sensor tags were implanted in the musculature associated with the cleithrum of Atlantic bluefin tuna (<i>Thunnus thynnus</i>) using an atraumatic trocar to investigate their field physiological rates for the first time (Rouyer et al., <span>2025b</span>).</p><p>Acoustic telemetry is now an accessible tool for fish ecologists, but there are limitations to what tracking fish can tell us, which was discussed by Jacoby and Piper (<span>2025</span>). One of the most effective ways that acoustic telemetry is used is for improved understanding of behavioural mechanisms in fish, such as homing (Mitamura et al., <span>2025</span>) or elusive spawning migrations (Abecasis et al., <span>2025</span>). Acoustic telemetry can also offer the opportunity to investigate research questions at the metacommunity level, for example, studying coexistence, resource partitioning and management of multiple species (Orrell et al., <span>2025</span>). Applying random forest models to environmental data associated with telemetry-based presence–absence in several species can help improve our ability to infer fish habitat suitability, which can be used for fish management and restoration (Larocque et al., <span>2025</span>). Acoustic telemetry data can provide critical estimates of fish vital rates, such as survival, when associated with mark-recapture Cormack-Jolly-Seber models, which can be applied for fisheries management (Rodger, Guthrie, et al., <span>2025</span>) or infer multispecies tagging mortality (Martínez-Ramírez et al., <span>2025</span>). Acoustic telemetry can also be used in restoration ecology, for example, to monitor how fish use dam passage in fragmented rivers (Dodd et al., <span>2025</span>; Shry et al., <span>2025</span>) or by monitoring the behaviour and survival of hatchery-fish reared to stimulate recovery of a population afflicted by low survival of wild fish (Sortland et al., <span>2025</span>). The development of regional and national scale acoustic telemetry networks also allows one to monitor the migrations of multiple species at larger scales (Livernois et al., <span>2025</span>) or migrations at the interface of freshwater and marine systems (Pearson et al., <span>2025</span>; Rodger, Lilly, et al., <span>2025</span>). Although many acoustic telemetry studies assess connectivity of tagged individuals among and between habitats, the term ‘connectivity’ has never been consistently used. Welch et al. (<span>2025</span>) provide a framework of connectivity definitions to assist future studies on connectivity. Among the limitations of acoustic telemetry is the variability in the detection range, which can be highly reduced in shallow and structurally complex environment. Kanno et al. (<span>2025</span>) challenged the use of acoustic telemetry in mangrove habitats, characterized by very shallow depths and dynamic seascapes, to study shark and ray movement, demonstrating that fish can be successfully tracked in these understudied habitats. Tag attachment innovations are constantly pushing the limits in tag retention and track durations, improving the quality and quantity of data collected from animals (Junge et al., <span>2024</span>).</p><p>This research collection provides the reader with a broad overview of the latest developments and application of acoustic telemetry in the field of fish ecology and management. Biologging and telemetry represent a rapidly evolving field, and the biennial International Conference on Fish Telemetry is a key venue for conversations about new developments and novel applications of fish tracking to address the most complex questions confronted by aquatic scientists and managers. This collection of articles provides the readers with inspired new developments in the field and will be useful to support future research for the study of fish movement ecology.</p>","PeriodicalId":15794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of fish biology","volume":"106 5","pages":"1257-1259"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jfb.70064","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of fish biology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfb.70064","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Telemetry and biologging have been key tools in fish ecology for several decades (Hussey et al., 2015; Matley et al., 2022; Watanabe & Papastamatiou, 2023) and helped uncover several mysteries within this realm, including migrations, behaviour, activity and space use, intra- and interspecific interactions or human impacts. The technology has remarkably improved since its first application, allowing us to monitor smaller-sized fish for longer periods. Sensors on board tags add additional capacity to measure internal and external properties of the tagged fish, such as their temperature, depth and acceleration. In addition, the analytical tools and approaches to infer fish movement and behaviour derived from telemetry data have considerably advanced to allow complex and high-dimensional spatial and temporal analyses.
There is a global community of fish-tracking scientists who use animal tracking tools to address applied and fundamental questions about fish populations in every ocean of the world and scores of inland waters. The Sixth International Conference on Fish Telemetry gathered many of these scientists in Sète, France, from 11 to 16 June 2023, providing the opportunity to share the latest advances in telemetry approaches and technologies for studying movement ecology of fish and for fisheries management. The present collection of papers is representative of the current trends in fish ecology studied through the prism of biologging and telemetry, with 11 (41%) papers focused on marine systems, 7 (26%) on freshwater systems and 9 (33%) addressing both systems (i.e., estuary or transitions between rivers and sea).
This special issue offers readers a wide range of approaches and tagging methods applied to dive deeper into a fish's movement ecology. Although the more common tagging methods provided new insights into fish ecology with acoustic telemetry determining the large-scale migrations of rays in a regional network of receivers (Elston et al., 2025) and pop-up archival satellite tags providing the first long-term migration route of sunfish (Mola mola L.) in the Mediterranean Sea (Rouyer et al., 2025a), other developing tools were also applied. For example, data-storage tags were used in combination with acoustic telemetry to study connectivity of pollack (Pollachius pollachius) in the French-English Channel (Gonse et al., 2025). In addition, several approaches were proposed to study predation in fish, including acoustic tags with acceleration sensors to map the dynamics of shark activity and its associated predation pressure on prey (Laurioux et al., 2025) or the test and use of predation tags in several case studies: brown trout (Salmo trutta L.; Kennedy et al., 2025), largemouth bass (Micropterus nigricans; Shorgan et al., 2025) and salmon (Salmo salar; Waters et al., 2025). More well-established sensors, such as depth and temperature sensors, integrated into acoustic tags were also used to investigate environmental preferences and niche partitioning of fish (Nickel et al., 2025). Depth sensors integrated into positioning systems allow the incorporation of the vertical dimension of fish activity by building more accurate three-dimensional habitat use models (Richter et al., 2025). Finally, heart-rate sensor tags were implanted in the musculature associated with the cleithrum of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) using an atraumatic trocar to investigate their field physiological rates for the first time (Rouyer et al., 2025b).
Acoustic telemetry is now an accessible tool for fish ecologists, but there are limitations to what tracking fish can tell us, which was discussed by Jacoby and Piper (2025). One of the most effective ways that acoustic telemetry is used is for improved understanding of behavioural mechanisms in fish, such as homing (Mitamura et al., 2025) or elusive spawning migrations (Abecasis et al., 2025). Acoustic telemetry can also offer the opportunity to investigate research questions at the metacommunity level, for example, studying coexistence, resource partitioning and management of multiple species (Orrell et al., 2025). Applying random forest models to environmental data associated with telemetry-based presence–absence in several species can help improve our ability to infer fish habitat suitability, which can be used for fish management and restoration (Larocque et al., 2025). Acoustic telemetry data can provide critical estimates of fish vital rates, such as survival, when associated with mark-recapture Cormack-Jolly-Seber models, which can be applied for fisheries management (Rodger, Guthrie, et al., 2025) or infer multispecies tagging mortality (Martínez-Ramírez et al., 2025). Acoustic telemetry can also be used in restoration ecology, for example, to monitor how fish use dam passage in fragmented rivers (Dodd et al., 2025; Shry et al., 2025) or by monitoring the behaviour and survival of hatchery-fish reared to stimulate recovery of a population afflicted by low survival of wild fish (Sortland et al., 2025). The development of regional and national scale acoustic telemetry networks also allows one to monitor the migrations of multiple species at larger scales (Livernois et al., 2025) or migrations at the interface of freshwater and marine systems (Pearson et al., 2025; Rodger, Lilly, et al., 2025). Although many acoustic telemetry studies assess connectivity of tagged individuals among and between habitats, the term ‘connectivity’ has never been consistently used. Welch et al. (2025) provide a framework of connectivity definitions to assist future studies on connectivity. Among the limitations of acoustic telemetry is the variability in the detection range, which can be highly reduced in shallow and structurally complex environment. Kanno et al. (2025) challenged the use of acoustic telemetry in mangrove habitats, characterized by very shallow depths and dynamic seascapes, to study shark and ray movement, demonstrating that fish can be successfully tracked in these understudied habitats. Tag attachment innovations are constantly pushing the limits in tag retention and track durations, improving the quality and quantity of data collected from animals (Junge et al., 2024).
This research collection provides the reader with a broad overview of the latest developments and application of acoustic telemetry in the field of fish ecology and management. Biologging and telemetry represent a rapidly evolving field, and the biennial International Conference on Fish Telemetry is a key venue for conversations about new developments and novel applications of fish tracking to address the most complex questions confronted by aquatic scientists and managers. This collection of articles provides the readers with inspired new developments in the field and will be useful to support future research for the study of fish movement ecology.
几十年来,遥测和生物学一直是鱼类生态学的关键工具(Hussey et al., 2015;Matley et al., 2022;渡边,Papastamatiou, 2023),并帮助揭开了这一领域的几个谜团,包括迁徙、行为、活动和空间使用、种内和种间相互作用或人类影响。这项技术自首次应用以来有了显著的改进,使我们能够长时间地监测较小的鱼类。标签上的传感器增加了额外的能力来测量被标签鱼的内部和外部特性,比如它们的温度、深度和加速度。此外,从遥测数据推断鱼类运动和行为的分析工具和方法已经相当先进,可以进行复杂的高维空间和时间分析。有一个由鱼类追踪科学家组成的全球社区,他们使用动物追踪工具来解决有关世界各大洋和许多内陆水域鱼类种群的应用和基本问题。第六届国际鱼类遥测技术会议于2023年6月11日至16日在法国s<e:1>特举行,聚集了许多这些科学家,为分享研究鱼类运动生态学和渔业管理的遥测方法和技术的最新进展提供了机会。目前收集的论文代表了通过生物学和遥测技术研究鱼类生态学的当前趋势,其中11篇(41%)论文关注海洋系统,7篇(26%)关注淡水系统,9篇(33%)涉及两个系统(即河口或河流与海洋之间的过渡)。这一期特刊为读者提供了广泛的方法和标签方法,应用于深入研究鱼类的运动生态学。虽然更常见的标记方法为鱼类生态学提供了新的见解,声学遥测确定了区域接收器网络中射线的大规模迁移(Elston等人,2025),弹出式档案卫星标签提供了地中海太阳鱼(Mola Mola L.)的第一个长期迁移路线(Rouyer等人,2025a),但其他开发工具也得到了应用。例如,将数据存储标签与声学遥测技术相结合,用于研究法英海峡明鳕(polachius Pollachius)的连通性(Gonse et al., 2025)。此外,研究人员还提出了几种方法来研究鱼类的捕食行为,包括带有加速度传感器的声标签,以绘制鲨鱼活动的动态及其对猎物的相关捕食压力(Laurioux等人,2025)或在几个案例研究中测试和使用捕食标签:褐鳟(Salmo trutta L.;Kennedy et al., 2025),黑鲈(Micropterus nigricans;Shorgan et al., 2025)和鲑鱼(Salmo salar;沃特斯等人,2025)。更完善的传感器,如深度和温度传感器,集成到声学标签中,也用于调查鱼类的环境偏好和生态位划分(Nickel等,2025)。将深度传感器集成到定位系统中,通过建立更精确的三维栖息地使用模型,可以将鱼类活动的垂直维度纳入其中(Richter et al., 2025)。最后,使用无伤性套管针将心率传感器标签植入大西洋蓝鳍金枪鱼(Thunnus thynnus)胸肌相关的肌肉组织中,首次研究其野外生理速率(Rouyer等,2025b)。声学遥测技术现在是鱼类生态学家可以使用的工具,但是跟踪鱼类可以告诉我们的东西有局限性,这是Jacoby和Piper(2025)讨论过的。使用声波遥测技术最有效的方法之一是提高对鱼类行为机制的理解,例如归巢(Mitamura等人,2025)或难以捉摸的产卵迁徙(Abecasis等人,2025)。声波遥测还可以提供在元群落水平上调查研究问题的机会,例如研究多物种的共存、资源分配和管理(Orrell et al., 2025)。将随机森林模型应用于与一些物种的遥测存在-缺失相关的环境数据,可以帮助我们提高推断鱼类栖息地适宜性的能力,这可用于鱼类管理和恢复(Larocque et al., 2025)。声学遥测数据与标记-再捕获Cormack-Jolly-Seber模型相结合,可提供鱼类生命率(如存活率)的关键估计,该模型可用于渔业管理(Rodger, Guthrie, et al., 2025)或推断多物种标记死亡率(Martínez-Ramírez et al., 2025)。声波遥测也可用于恢复生态学,例如,监测鱼类如何在破碎河流中使用水坝通道(Dodd等人,2025;Shry等人。 (Sortland et al., 2025)或通过监测孵卵鱼的行为和生存,以刺激受野生鱼类低存活率影响的种群的恢复(Sortland et al., 2025)。区域和国家尺度声学遥测网络的发展也使人们能够在更大尺度上监测多种物种的迁移(Livernois等人,2025)或淡水和海洋系统界面的迁移(Pearson等人,2025;罗杰,莉莉等人,2025)。尽管许多声学遥测研究评估了栖息地之间和之间标记个体的连通性,但“连通性”一词从未被一致使用过。Welch等人(2025)提供了一个连通性定义框架,以协助未来对连通性的研究。声波遥测的局限性之一是探测距离的可变性,在浅层和结构复杂的环境中,这种可变性可以大大降低。Kanno等人(2025)挑战了在红树林栖息地中使用声波遥测技术来研究鲨鱼和鳐鱼的运动,红树林的特点是深度很浅,海景动态,这表明在这些研究不足的栖息地中可以成功地跟踪鱼类。标签附着创新不断推动标签保留和跟踪持续时间的极限,提高了从动物身上收集的数据的质量和数量(Junge et al., 2024)。本研究集为读者提供了鱼类生态和管理领域声学遥测技术的最新发展和应用的广泛概述。生物学和遥测是一个快速发展的领域,两年一次的国际鱼类遥测会议是讨论鱼类跟踪新发展和新应用的关键场所,以解决水生科学家和管理者面临的最复杂的问题。这篇文章为读者提供了该领域的新发展,并将有助于支持鱼类运动生态学的未来研究。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Fish Biology is a leading international journal for scientists engaged in all aspects of fishes and fisheries research, both fresh water and marine. The journal publishes high-quality papers relevant to the central theme of fish biology and aims to bring together under one cover an overall picture of the research in progress and to provide international communication among researchers in many disciplines with a common interest in the biology of fish.