The Congregational Care Network: Preliminary Data From a Healthcare/Congregational Partnership for At-Risk Older Adults.

John D Foster, Alexia M Torke, Deanna R Willis, Shadreck W Kamwendo, James E Slaven, Brownsyne Tucker-Edmonds, Erika R Cheng, Tricia Behringer, Notoshia Howard, Sherri Session
{"title":"The Congregational Care Network: Preliminary Data From a Healthcare/Congregational Partnership for At-Risk Older Adults.","authors":"John D Foster, Alexia M Torke, Deanna R Willis, Shadreck W Kamwendo, James E Slaven, Brownsyne Tucker-Edmonds, Erika R Cheng, Tricia Behringer, Notoshia Howard, Sherri Session","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Social isolation and loneliness are significant public health crises that can exacerbate stress and diminish health behaviors, leading to overall reductions in well-being. The effects of systemic upstream social determinants of health (SDOH) can worsen these effects. Partnerships between communities of faith and health systems have the potential to reduce social isolation and loneliness, address unmet social needs, and improve access to healthcare.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Congregational Care Network (CCN), a collaboration between a health system and local congregations in neighborhoods with high poverty and gaps in other SDOH, provided 1 h per week of individual, volunteer companionship to older adult patients for 90 days. The health system provided training and professional support from social workers and chaplains. A program evaluation measured loneliness before and after participation and healthcare utilization in the 90 days before, during, and after the program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CCN recruited 28 congregations representing diverse religious affiliations and 335 patients participated in the CCN program. Patients who received CCN services had a median age of 64.9 years (standard deviation 11.5), were 27.2% male, and 58.8% Black. There were significant reductions in DeJong Gierveld loneliness scores from before to after program engagement (median change score: 1 (interquartile range (IQR) 0-2, p < 0.001)). The proportion with 1+ emergency department visits was significantly lower after CCN compared to before (16.8% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.007); the proportion with inpatient visits was lower during CCN compared to before (12.2% vs. 17.3% vs. p = 0.032). The proportion with outpatient visits was higher during CCN than before (71.0% vs. 63.8%, p = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CCN partnership between congregations and a local health system is a feasible model for at-risk older adults that may reduce loneliness and shift healthcare utilization from acute to outpatient settings, providing greater continuity of care and fewer burdensome acute care visits.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Social isolation and loneliness are significant public health crises that can exacerbate stress and diminish health behaviors, leading to overall reductions in well-being. The effects of systemic upstream social determinants of health (SDOH) can worsen these effects. Partnerships between communities of faith and health systems have the potential to reduce social isolation and loneliness, address unmet social needs, and improve access to healthcare.

Methods: The Congregational Care Network (CCN), a collaboration between a health system and local congregations in neighborhoods with high poverty and gaps in other SDOH, provided 1 h per week of individual, volunteer companionship to older adult patients for 90 days. The health system provided training and professional support from social workers and chaplains. A program evaluation measured loneliness before and after participation and healthcare utilization in the 90 days before, during, and after the program.

Results: CCN recruited 28 congregations representing diverse religious affiliations and 335 patients participated in the CCN program. Patients who received CCN services had a median age of 64.9 years (standard deviation 11.5), were 27.2% male, and 58.8% Black. There were significant reductions in DeJong Gierveld loneliness scores from before to after program engagement (median change score: 1 (interquartile range (IQR) 0-2, p < 0.001)). The proportion with 1+ emergency department visits was significantly lower after CCN compared to before (16.8% vs. 24.6%, p = 0.007); the proportion with inpatient visits was lower during CCN compared to before (12.2% vs. 17.3% vs. p = 0.032). The proportion with outpatient visits was higher during CCN than before (71.0% vs. 63.8%, p = 0.045).

Conclusion: The CCN partnership between congregations and a local health system is a feasible model for at-risk older adults that may reduce loneliness and shift healthcare utilization from acute to outpatient settings, providing greater continuity of care and fewer burdensome acute care visits.

会众护理网络:来自医疗保健/会众合作伙伴关系的初步数据。
背景:社会孤立和孤独是重大的公共卫生危机,可加剧压力,减少健康行为,导致福祉总体下降。系统性健康上游社会决定因素(SDOH)的影响可使这些影响恶化。信仰社区与卫生系统之间的伙伴关系有可能减少社会隔离和孤独,解决未满足的社会需求,并改善获得卫生保健的机会。方法:会众护理网络(CCN)是卫生系统与其他SDOH中高度贫困和差距的社区的当地会众之间的合作,每周为老年患者提供1小时的个人志愿陪伴,为期90天。卫生系统提供了社会工作者和牧师的培训和专业支持。一项计划评估测量了参与计划前后的孤独感以及计划前后90天内的医疗保健利用情况。结果:CCN招募了28个代表不同宗教信仰的会众,335名患者参加了CCN项目。接受CCN服务的患者中位年龄为64.9岁(标准差为11.5),其中27.2%为男性,58.8%为黑人。参与项目前后,DeJong Gierveld孤独感得分显著降低(中位数变化得分:1)(四分位范围(IQR) 0-2, p)。结论:对于有风险的老年人来说,CCN与当地卫生系统之间的伙伴关系可能会减少孤独感,并将医疗保健利用从急症转向门诊,提供更大的连续性护理和更少的负担急症护理就诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信