Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization with acoustic shadowing technique: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Haoyang Geng, Wenping Liu, Ruizhao Lyu, Yang Bai, Rui Liu, Jianhua Wang
{"title":"Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization with acoustic shadowing technique: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Haoyang Geng, Wenping Liu, Ruizhao Lyu, Yang Bai, Rui Liu, Jianhua Wang","doi":"10.1177/11297298251338711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) and acoustic shadowing technologies demonstrate superior efficacy to palpation in improving radial artery catheterization success rates. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of combining DNTP with acoustic shadowing technology for patients undergoing radial artery catheterization.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this randomized controlled study conducted at a single center, 152 patients requiring radial artery catheterization during anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the ultrasound-guided acoustic shadowing combined with dynamic needle tip positioning (AS-DNTP) group or the DNTP group (1:1). All procedures were performed by experienced operators. The primary outcome was the number of needle tip retractions and directional corrections, while the secondary outcomes included the first-pass success rate, total number of attempts, ultrasound localization time, overall operating time, length of the intra-arterial catheter, needle tip position score, and overall complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AS-DNTP group demonstrated fewer total needle tip retractions and directional corrections (2.22 ± 1.06 vs 2.84 ± 1.18, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and a higher first-pass success rate (96.10%, 74/77 cases) compared to the DNTP group (86.67%, 65/75 cases), with an absolute difference of 9.44% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31%-19.28%; <i>p</i> = 0.038). Additionally, the AS-DNTP group had a lower overall number of attempts (1.04 ± 0.195 vs 1.13 ± 0.342, <i>p</i> = 0.038) and a shorter ultrasound localization time (6.78 ± 2.28 s vs 7.57 ± 2.55 s, <i>p</i> = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AS-DNTP technology holds the potential to reduce the need for needle tip retractions and directional corrections during radial artery catheterization while increasing the first-pass success rate and decreasing the ultrasound localization time.</p>","PeriodicalId":56113,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Access","volume":" ","pages":"11297298251338711"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Access","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11297298251338711","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) and acoustic shadowing technologies demonstrate superior efficacy to palpation in improving radial artery catheterization success rates. This study aimed to evaluate the benefits of combining DNTP with acoustic shadowing technology for patients undergoing radial artery catheterization.

Method: In this randomized controlled study conducted at a single center, 152 patients requiring radial artery catheterization during anesthesia were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the ultrasound-guided acoustic shadowing combined with dynamic needle tip positioning (AS-DNTP) group or the DNTP group (1:1). All procedures were performed by experienced operators. The primary outcome was the number of needle tip retractions and directional corrections, while the secondary outcomes included the first-pass success rate, total number of attempts, ultrasound localization time, overall operating time, length of the intra-arterial catheter, needle tip position score, and overall complications.

Results: The AS-DNTP group demonstrated fewer total needle tip retractions and directional corrections (2.22 ± 1.06 vs 2.84 ± 1.18, p = 0.001), and a higher first-pass success rate (96.10%, 74/77 cases) compared to the DNTP group (86.67%, 65/75 cases), with an absolute difference of 9.44% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.31%-19.28%; p = 0.038). Additionally, the AS-DNTP group had a lower overall number of attempts (1.04 ± 0.195 vs 1.13 ± 0.342, p = 0.038) and a shorter ultrasound localization time (6.78 ± 2.28 s vs 7.57 ± 2.55 s, p = 0.045).

Conclusion: AS-DNTP technology holds the potential to reduce the need for needle tip retractions and directional corrections during radial artery catheterization while increasing the first-pass success rate and decreasing the ultrasound localization time.

超声引导声影技术动脉插管:一项随机对照试验。
背景:超声引导的动态针尖定位(DNTP)和声阴影技术在提高桡动脉插管成功率方面比触诊更有效。本研究旨在评估DNTP与声学阴影技术联合应用于桡动脉导管置入术患者的益处。方法:在单中心进行的随机对照研究中,纳入了152例麻醉期间需要桡动脉插管的患者。参与者被随机分配到超声引导声影结合动态针尖定位(AS-DNTP)组或DNTP组(1:1)。所有程序均由经验丰富的操作人员执行。主要观察指标为针尖牵出次数和方向矫正次数,次要观察指标为一次成功率、总尝试次数、超声定位时间、总操作时间、动脉导管长度、针尖位置评分、总并发症。结果:AS-DNTP组比DNTP组(86.67%,65/75例)有更少的针尖总缩回和方向矫正(2.22±1.06 vs 2.84±1.18,p = 0.001)和更高的一次通过成功率(96.10%,74/77例),绝对差异为9.44%(95%可信区间(CI): 0.31% ~ 19.28%;p = 0.038)。此外,AS-DNTP组总尝试次数较低(1.04±0.195 vs 1.13±0.342,p = 0.038),超声定位时间较短(6.78±2.28 s vs 7.57±2.55 s, p = 0.045)。结论:AS-DNTP技术具有减少桡动脉置管过程中针尖缩回和方向矫正的潜力,同时提高了一次通过成功率,缩短了超声定位时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Vascular Access
Journal of Vascular Access 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
31.60%
发文量
181
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vascular Access (JVA) is issued six times per year; it considers the publication of original manuscripts dealing with clinical and laboratory investigations in the fast growing field of vascular access. In addition reviews, case reports and clinical trials are welcome, as well as papers dedicated to more practical aspects covering new devices and techniques. All contributions, coming from all over the world, undergo the peer-review process. The Journal of Vascular Access is divided into independent sections, each led by Editors of the highest scientific level: • Dialysis • Oncology • Interventional radiology • Nutrition • Nursing • Intensive care Correspondence related to published papers is also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信