Optimizing feedback reception: a scoping review of skills and strategies for medical learners.

Jennifer Rowe, Diane Bouchard-Lamothe, Teagan Haggerty, Jake Engel, Cole Etherington, Manvinder Kaur, Etienne Vincent, Nibras Ghanmi, Preet Gujral, Valentina Ly, Sylvain Boet
{"title":"Optimizing feedback reception: a scoping review of skills and strategies for medical learners.","authors":"Jennifer Rowe, Diane Bouchard-Lamothe, Teagan Haggerty, Jake Engel, Cole Etherington, Manvinder Kaur, Etienne Vincent, Nibras Ghanmi, Preet Gujral, Valentina Ly, Sylvain Boet","doi":"10.36834/cmej.79722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Feedback remains essential to a learner's professional development. Most feedback literature focuses on provision of feedback, and there is a lack of evidence-based data to support learners in developing skills to receive, evaluate and use feedback, independently of context. This scoping review mapped the literature regarding strategies and skills that optimize medical learners' reception to feedback.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Investigators conducted searches in MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science Core collection from inception to May 2023. Study inclusion criteria were primary evidence sources, and strategies or skills for improved feedback reception for medical learners. Data were screened and extracted by pairs of independent reviewers. Investigators summarized study characteristics, outcomes, educational methods, and interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7692 total studies, six provided strategies and skills to improve feedback reception. Delivery of education was via workshops (<i>n</i> = 5 studies) that proposed cognitive, reflective and experiential learning activities, all reporting learners' self-perceived improvement of feedback behaviour. Nine strategies and seven tools were identified, focusing on general approach, soliciting or evaluating feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":72503,"journal":{"name":"Canadian medical education journal","volume":"16 2","pages":"48-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068207/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian medical education journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36834/cmej.79722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Feedback remains essential to a learner's professional development. Most feedback literature focuses on provision of feedback, and there is a lack of evidence-based data to support learners in developing skills to receive, evaluate and use feedback, independently of context. This scoping review mapped the literature regarding strategies and skills that optimize medical learners' reception to feedback.

Methods: Investigators conducted searches in MEDLINE, Embase, ERIC, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science Core collection from inception to May 2023. Study inclusion criteria were primary evidence sources, and strategies or skills for improved feedback reception for medical learners. Data were screened and extracted by pairs of independent reviewers. Investigators summarized study characteristics, outcomes, educational methods, and interventions.

Results: Of 7692 total studies, six provided strategies and skills to improve feedback reception. Delivery of education was via workshops (n = 5 studies) that proposed cognitive, reflective and experiential learning activities, all reporting learners' self-perceived improvement of feedback behaviour. Nine strategies and seven tools were identified, focusing on general approach, soliciting or evaluating feedback.

优化反馈接收:对医学学习者的技能和策略的范围审查。
背景:反馈对学习者的专业发展至关重要。大多数反馈文献侧重于提供反馈,并且缺乏基于证据的数据来支持学习者培养独立于上下文的接收、评估和使用反馈的技能。这范围审查绘制了文献关于策略和技能,优化医学学习者的接收反馈。方法:研究人员检索MEDLINE、Embase、ERIC、APA PsycINFO和Web of Science Core collection自成立至2023年5月。研究纳入标准是主要的证据来源,以及改善医学学习者反馈接收的策略或技巧。数据由独立审稿人对筛选和提取。研究者总结了研究特点、结果、教育方法和干预措施。结果:在7692项研究中,有6项研究提供了改善反馈接收的策略和技巧。通过研讨会(n = 5项研究)提供教育,这些研讨会提出了认知、反思和体验式学习活动,所有研究都报告了学习者自我感知的反馈行为改善。确定了九项战略和七项工具,重点是一般方法,征求或评估反馈。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信