Modified Early Warning Score scores in the emergency department: Factors associated with changing scores to evaluate clinical improvement or deterioration.

Q3 Medicine
Lars I Veldhuis, Miriam A Visser, Laura M Verweij, Prabath W B Nanayakkara, Jeroen Ludikhuize
{"title":"Modified Early Warning Score scores in the emergency department: Factors associated with changing scores to evaluate clinical improvement or deterioration.","authors":"Lars I Veldhuis, Miriam A Visser, Laura M Verweij, Prabath W B Nanayakkara, Jeroen Ludikhuize","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_43_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the acute care chain, a heterogeneous group of patients seeks medical attention, of whom a small proportion become critically ill. Prediction models, such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), may assist in the identification of these patients and thereby prevent serious adverse events. The delta score within the emergency room (emergency department [ED]) is associated with outcome. However, it is unknown which factors contribute to these changes in MEWS scores.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study at the Amsterdam University Medical Center, which included adult patients presented to the ED by ambulance from March 2022 to October 2022. We collected MEWS at ambulance arrival and 3 h after ED admission, as well as information about diagnostic tests, therapy, and interventions. Our primary outcome was the association of patients' characteristics and acute care actions (diagnostics, therapy, and interventions) with changes in the MEWS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 261 patients were included. A higher MEWS at presentation with subsequent improvement was related to better outcomes and they received more therapeutic interventions and the administration of therapy, although these results may have been biased by the need for oxygen supply in respiratory unstable patients. In comparison with patients with normal and stable MEWS scores, they received overall less therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MEWS could be used to predict short-term critical illness in patients presenting to the ED. Further research is needed to evaluate the association of the acute care chains' performance and changes in MEWS scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"16-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_43_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the acute care chain, a heterogeneous group of patients seeks medical attention, of whom a small proportion become critically ill. Prediction models, such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), may assist in the identification of these patients and thereby prevent serious adverse events. The delta score within the emergency room (emergency department [ED]) is associated with outcome. However, it is unknown which factors contribute to these changes in MEWS scores.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study at the Amsterdam University Medical Center, which included adult patients presented to the ED by ambulance from March 2022 to October 2022. We collected MEWS at ambulance arrival and 3 h after ED admission, as well as information about diagnostic tests, therapy, and interventions. Our primary outcome was the association of patients' characteristics and acute care actions (diagnostics, therapy, and interventions) with changes in the MEWS score.

Results: A total of 261 patients were included. A higher MEWS at presentation with subsequent improvement was related to better outcomes and they received more therapeutic interventions and the administration of therapy, although these results may have been biased by the need for oxygen supply in respiratory unstable patients. In comparison with patients with normal and stable MEWS scores, they received overall less therapy.

Conclusion: MEWS could be used to predict short-term critical illness in patients presenting to the ED. Further research is needed to evaluate the association of the acute care chains' performance and changes in MEWS scores.

修改急诊科早期预警评分:与改变评分评估临床改善或恶化相关的因素
背景:在急症护理链中,一个异质性的患者群体寻求医疗照顾,其中一小部分成为危重疾病。预测模型,如修正早期预警评分(MEWS),可以帮助识别这些患者,从而防止严重的不良事件。急诊室(急诊科[ED])的delta评分与结果相关。然而,尚不清楚是哪些因素导致了MEWS评分的这些变化。方法:这是阿姆斯特丹大学医学中心的一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2022年3月至2022年10月由救护车送到急诊科的成年患者。我们收集了救护车到达时和急诊入院后3小时的MEWS,以及有关诊断测试、治疗和干预措施的信息。我们的主要结局是患者特征和急性护理行动(诊断、治疗和干预)与MEWS评分变化的关系。结果:共纳入261例患者。出现时较高的MEWS和随后的改善与更好的结果相关,他们接受了更多的治疗干预和治疗管理,尽管这些结果可能因呼吸不稳定患者需要供氧而有所偏差。与MEWS评分正常和稳定的患者相比,他们接受的总体治疗较少。结论:MEWS可用于预测急诊科患者的短期危重疾病。需要进一步的研究来评估急性护理链的表现与MEWS评分变化的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信