The medical consultation as a site for governing abortion.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Culture, Health & Sexuality Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1080/13691058.2024.2449514
Erica Millar
{"title":"The medical consultation as a site for governing abortion.","authors":"Erica Millar","doi":"10.1080/13691058.2024.2449514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Australian abortion law channels abortion seekers into consultations with medical professionals. This article draws on clinical guidelines on abortion care to analyse three features of the medical consultation: counselling, contraceptive counselling, and dating ultrasounds. Reading clinical guidelines as a means by which the state attempts to enrol medical professionals into systems of governance, it argues that the medical consultation is a site at which abortion seekers are incited to think, feel and act according to norms of gender that naturalise parenthood and birth for pregnant people as well as the biopolitical aim to increase the use of contraception to reduce abortions. Norms of the medical consultation are productive of abortion exceptionalism and decentre the needs, authority and embodied experiences of abortion seekers. After unpacking how these norms circulate in clinical guidelines on abortion care, this article turns briefly to an alternative model of care developed in self-managed abortion activist scholarship. This model underlines the regulatory norms currently embedded within medical consultations while also providing a pathway through which they can be reconfigured to better centre and support abortion seekers.</p>","PeriodicalId":10799,"journal":{"name":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1210-1225"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Culture, Health & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2024.2449514","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Australian abortion law channels abortion seekers into consultations with medical professionals. This article draws on clinical guidelines on abortion care to analyse three features of the medical consultation: counselling, contraceptive counselling, and dating ultrasounds. Reading clinical guidelines as a means by which the state attempts to enrol medical professionals into systems of governance, it argues that the medical consultation is a site at which abortion seekers are incited to think, feel and act according to norms of gender that naturalise parenthood and birth for pregnant people as well as the biopolitical aim to increase the use of contraception to reduce abortions. Norms of the medical consultation are productive of abortion exceptionalism and decentre the needs, authority and embodied experiences of abortion seekers. After unpacking how these norms circulate in clinical guidelines on abortion care, this article turns briefly to an alternative model of care developed in self-managed abortion activist scholarship. This model underlines the regulatory norms currently embedded within medical consultations while also providing a pathway through which they can be reconfigured to better centre and support abortion seekers.

作为管理堕胎的场所的医疗咨询。
澳大利亚堕胎法引导寻求堕胎的人与医疗专业人员进行磋商。本文借鉴人工流产护理的临床指南,分析了医学咨询的三个特点:咨询、避孕咨询和约会超声波。将临床指南解读为国家试图将医疗专业人员纳入治理体系的一种手段,它认为,医疗咨询是一个鼓励堕胎寻求者根据性别规范思考、感受和行动的场所,这些规范使怀孕的人自然地成为父母和生育,并达到增加使用避孕措施以减少堕胎的生物政治目标。医疗咨询规范产生了堕胎例外论,分散了寻求堕胎者的需求、权威和具体经验。在解释了这些规范如何在堕胎护理的临床指南中流传之后,本文简要地转向了在自我管理堕胎活动家奖学金中发展起来的另一种护理模式。这一模式强调了目前嵌入医疗咨询的监管规范,同时也提供了一条途径,通过该途径可以重新配置这些规范,以更好地集中和支持寻求堕胎的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.50%
发文量
80
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信