Comparing EQ-5D-5L and IPOS among residents with malignant tumors in a community home hospice: a longitudinal study.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Takeshi Miura, Masato Kaneko, Kei Kawano, Yuka Kanoya, Makoto Kuroki
{"title":"Comparing EQ-5D-5L and IPOS among residents with malignant tumors in a community home hospice: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Takeshi Miura, Masato Kaneko, Kei Kawano, Yuka Kanoya, Makoto Kuroki","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01779-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In community home hospices, limited medical staff and high workloads necessitate measurement models that objectively and effectively capture the needs of residents with malignant tumors. This study compares the measurement properties and feasibility of the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) and Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS), primarily used in palliative care, as only few studies have compared their measurement properties and feasibility based on their actual application in home hospice care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two-wave longitudinal data were collected from 2021 to 2023 at a community home hospice in Japan from a sample of 120 residents diagnosed with malignant tumors. Residents completed both the EQ-5D-5L and IPOS upon admission. Data were collected at three main time points: the initial admission date, one week after admission, and when residents' conditions changed. This study evaluates the feasibility and measurement properties of EQ-5D-5L and IPOS, including ceiling and floor effects, correlations among domains, and responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The EQ-5D-5L demonstrated high feasibility, whereas the IPOS had moderate feasibility with a higher missing data rate. Both scales had low ceiling and floor effects. The EQ-5D-5L showed low responsiveness, while the IPOS showed moderate responsiveness. Anxiety and the emotional domains of the IPOS or EQ-5D-5L scores were insignificantly correlated. Participants who did not complete the IPOS had significantly lower EQ-5D-5L scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The EQ-5D-5L may be slightly more suitable for the primary screening of needs in this setting owing to its higher feasibility. In contrast, the IPOS is an excellent tool when it is important to comprehensively and deeply capture the needs of individuals over time. We note that when selecting or using different measures, one must consider the specific characteristics of each measure.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"134"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01779-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In community home hospices, limited medical staff and high workloads necessitate measurement models that objectively and effectively capture the needs of residents with malignant tumors. This study compares the measurement properties and feasibility of the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) and Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS), primarily used in palliative care, as only few studies have compared their measurement properties and feasibility based on their actual application in home hospice care.

Methods: Two-wave longitudinal data were collected from 2021 to 2023 at a community home hospice in Japan from a sample of 120 residents diagnosed with malignant tumors. Residents completed both the EQ-5D-5L and IPOS upon admission. Data were collected at three main time points: the initial admission date, one week after admission, and when residents' conditions changed. This study evaluates the feasibility and measurement properties of EQ-5D-5L and IPOS, including ceiling and floor effects, correlations among domains, and responsiveness.

Results: The EQ-5D-5L demonstrated high feasibility, whereas the IPOS had moderate feasibility with a higher missing data rate. Both scales had low ceiling and floor effects. The EQ-5D-5L showed low responsiveness, while the IPOS showed moderate responsiveness. Anxiety and the emotional domains of the IPOS or EQ-5D-5L scores were insignificantly correlated. Participants who did not complete the IPOS had significantly lower EQ-5D-5L scores.

Conclusions: The EQ-5D-5L may be slightly more suitable for the primary screening of needs in this setting owing to its higher feasibility. In contrast, the IPOS is an excellent tool when it is important to comprehensively and deeply capture the needs of individuals over time. We note that when selecting or using different measures, one must consider the specific characteristics of each measure.

社区居家安宁疗护中恶性肿瘤患者EQ-5D-5L与IPOS之比较:一项纵向研究。
背景:在社区家庭临终关怀中,由于医护人员有限,工作量大,需要客观有效地捕捉恶性肿瘤住院患者需求的测量模型。本研究比较了主要用于姑息治疗的EuroQol 5维5级量表(EQ-5D-5L)和综合姑息治疗结局量表(Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale, IPOS)的测量特性和可行性,目前很少有研究结合其在居家安宁疗护中的实际应用对其测量特性和可行性进行比较。方法:从2021年至2023年在日本一家社区家庭临终关怀医院收集120名确诊为恶性肿瘤的居民的两波纵向数据。居民在入院时完成了EQ-5D-5L和IPOS。在三个主要时间点收集数据:首次入院日期,入院后一周,以及居民情况发生变化时。本研究评估了EQ-5D-5L和IPOS的可行性和测量特性,包括天花板和地板效应、域之间的相关性和响应性。结果:EQ-5D-5L具有较高的可行性,而IPOS具有中等的可行性,但缺失数据率较高。两种量表均具有较低的上限和下限效应。EQ-5D-5L表现出较低的反应性,而IPOS表现出中等的反应性。焦虑与IPOS或EQ-5D-5L得分的情绪域不显著相关。没有完成IPOS的参与者EQ-5D-5L得分明显较低。结论:EQ-5D-5L可能因其更高的可行性而更适合于本地区需求的初步筛查。相比之下,ipo是一个很好的工具,当它是重要的全面和深入地捕捉个人的需求随着时间的推移。我们注意到,在选择或使用不同的度量时,必须考虑每个度量的具体特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信