Occupational therapy-led self-management anxiety and stress programme: a mixed methods evaluation in community palliative medicine.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lauren Boland, Niamh Donnelly, Sarah Delaney, Julie Donohoe, Niamh Keaveny, Hayley Connolly, Deirdre Connolly
{"title":"Occupational therapy-led self-management anxiety and stress programme: a mixed methods evaluation in community palliative medicine.","authors":"Lauren Boland, Niamh Donnelly, Sarah Delaney, Julie Donohoe, Niamh Keaveny, Hayley Connolly, Deirdre Connolly","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>A key role of specialist palliative care occupational therapy is to enable patients to self-manage symptoms associated with a life-limiting illness. EMPOWER, a 4-week group programme, provides self-management interventions for stress and anxiety. The aim of this study is to evaluate the EMPOWER programme for community-based specialist palliative care patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An action research feasibility study employing a mixed methods approach was undertaken. Self-reporting outcome measures were administered pre-EMPOWER and post-EMPOWER. Qualitative focus groups and feedback forms were completed postintervention. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the service site.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six virtual and five inperson EMPOWER group programmes were facilitated with 33 participants. Twenty-five participants completed the preoutcome and postoutcome measures. Statistically significant improvements in anxiety (p=0.002), occupational performance (p=0.003) and satisfaction (p<0.001) were observed from preintervention to postintervention. Qualitative data analysis identified three main themes: (1) living with symptoms, (2) management of symptoms and (3) programme design and delivery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EMPOWER is considered an acceptable intervention by community-based palliative care patients. Improved understanding of self-management skills to manage anxiety encouraged participants to implement strategies and re-engage in meaningful goals. Recommendations were provided on the programme's design. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of EMPOWER in a larger group of community-based palliative care patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A key role of specialist palliative care occupational therapy is to enable patients to self-manage symptoms associated with a life-limiting illness. EMPOWER, a 4-week group programme, provides self-management interventions for stress and anxiety. The aim of this study is to evaluate the EMPOWER programme for community-based specialist palliative care patients.

Methods: An action research feasibility study employing a mixed methods approach was undertaken. Self-reporting outcome measures were administered pre-EMPOWER and post-EMPOWER. Qualitative focus groups and feedback forms were completed postintervention. Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee of the service site.

Results: Six virtual and five inperson EMPOWER group programmes were facilitated with 33 participants. Twenty-five participants completed the preoutcome and postoutcome measures. Statistically significant improvements in anxiety (p=0.002), occupational performance (p=0.003) and satisfaction (p<0.001) were observed from preintervention to postintervention. Qualitative data analysis identified three main themes: (1) living with symptoms, (2) management of symptoms and (3) programme design and delivery.

Conclusion: EMPOWER is considered an acceptable intervention by community-based palliative care patients. Improved understanding of self-management skills to manage anxiety encouraged participants to implement strategies and re-engage in meaningful goals. Recommendations were provided on the programme's design. Further research is required to evaluate the effectiveness of EMPOWER in a larger group of community-based palliative care patients.

职业治疗主导的自我管理焦虑和压力计划:社区姑息医学的混合方法评估。
目的:专业姑息治疗职业治疗的一个关键作用是使患者能够自我管理与限制生命的疾病相关的症状。EMPOWER是一个为期4周的团体项目,为压力和焦虑提供自我管理干预措施。本研究的目的是评估以社区为基础的专科姑息治疗患者的EMPOWER计划。方法:采用混合方法进行行动研究可行性研究。自我报告结果测量在授权前和授权后进行。定性焦点小组和反馈表格在干预后完成。本研究获得了服务站点的研究伦理委员会的伦理批准。结果:有33名参与者参与了6个虚拟和5个面对面的EMPOWER小组项目。25名参与者完成了结果前和结果后的测量。焦虑(p=0.002)、职业表现(p=0.003)和满意度均有统计学意义上的改善。结论:EMPOWER被认为是社区姑息治疗患者可接受的干预措施。提高对自我管理技能的理解以管理焦虑,鼓励参与者实施策略并重新参与有意义的目标。对方案的设计提出了建议。需要进一步的研究来评估EMPOWER在更大的社区姑息治疗患者群体中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.40%
发文量
170
期刊介绍: Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance. We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication. In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信