Michel Pompeu Sá, Eishan Ashwat, Xander Jacquemyn, Danial Ahmad, James A Brown, Derek Serna-Gallegos, Asishana Osho, Jordan P Bloom, Ibrahim Sultan
{"title":"The current state of transcatheter aortic valve replacement explant: an updated systematic review.","authors":"Michel Pompeu Sá, Eishan Ashwat, Xander Jacquemyn, Danial Ahmad, James A Brown, Derek Serna-Gallegos, Asishana Osho, Jordan P Bloom, Ibrahim Sultan","doi":"10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite ever-growing adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in younger healthier patients, a limited number of studies have described post-TAVR valve reinterventions such as surgical explantation known as \"TAVR explant\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review to characterize the current state of TAVR explant in patients with a failing transcatheter heart valve (THV) using data published by April 30, 2024 in compliance with the PRISMA and MOOSE reporting guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024529188).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight studies met the eligibility criteria. Almost all studies were non-randomized, observational, and retrospective. The incidence of TAVR explant ranged from 0.2% to 2.8% in patients with a mean age of 67.3-79.0 years, and women representing 25.0-47.1% of cases. The mean time between TAVR implant and explant was 17.0-674.9 days, with most studies reporting a mean time <365 days. Whereas the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score at the time of the TAVR implant ranged between 2.6% and 7.7% (with only one study with score >5%), the STS-PROM score at the time of the TAVR explant ranged between 3.9% and 9.9% (with 17 studies with score >5%). Isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) happened in 16.2-100% of cases, aortic root replacement was required in 2.6-41.2%, ascending aortic replacement was performed in 3.2-33.3% of cases. Mitral valve repair/replacement was necessary in 11.8-43.5% and tricuspid valve/repair replacement was done in 2.8-25.0%. Stroke rates were between 0.0% and 20.0% with most studies with rates above 4.0%. The 30-day death rate ranged from 4.8% to 50.0% with most studies with mortality rates higher than 10%. Observed-to-expected mortality ratio was higher than 1.0 in almost all the studies that reported this variable.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVR explant remains a rare event, but its clinical impact is non-negligible. Lifetime management strategies should be adopted in younger lower-risk patients when choosing THVs for the index TAVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":8067,"journal":{"name":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","volume":"14 2","pages":"85-97"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12013767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of cardiothoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/acs-2024-etavr-0075","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Despite ever-growing adoption of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in younger healthier patients, a limited number of studies have described post-TAVR valve reinterventions such as surgical explantation known as "TAVR explant".
Methods: We performed a systematic review to characterize the current state of TAVR explant in patients with a failing transcatheter heart valve (THV) using data published by April 30, 2024 in compliance with the PRISMA and MOOSE reporting guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024529188).
Results: Twenty-eight studies met the eligibility criteria. Almost all studies were non-randomized, observational, and retrospective. The incidence of TAVR explant ranged from 0.2% to 2.8% in patients with a mean age of 67.3-79.0 years, and women representing 25.0-47.1% of cases. The mean time between TAVR implant and explant was 17.0-674.9 days, with most studies reporting a mean time <365 days. Whereas the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Predicted Risk of Mortality (STS-PROM) score at the time of the TAVR implant ranged between 2.6% and 7.7% (with only one study with score >5%), the STS-PROM score at the time of the TAVR explant ranged between 3.9% and 9.9% (with 17 studies with score >5%). Isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) happened in 16.2-100% of cases, aortic root replacement was required in 2.6-41.2%, ascending aortic replacement was performed in 3.2-33.3% of cases. Mitral valve repair/replacement was necessary in 11.8-43.5% and tricuspid valve/repair replacement was done in 2.8-25.0%. Stroke rates were between 0.0% and 20.0% with most studies with rates above 4.0%. The 30-day death rate ranged from 4.8% to 50.0% with most studies with mortality rates higher than 10%. Observed-to-expected mortality ratio was higher than 1.0 in almost all the studies that reported this variable.
Conclusions: TAVR explant remains a rare event, but its clinical impact is non-negligible. Lifetime management strategies should be adopted in younger lower-risk patients when choosing THVs for the index TAVR.