Practical use of radiomic features as a metric for image quality discrimination in [18F] FDG-PET: a pilot study.

Jane Burns, Hannah O'Driscoll, Eamon Loughman
{"title":"Practical use of radiomic features as a metric for image quality discrimination in [<sup>18</sup>F] FDG-PET: a pilot study.","authors":"Jane Burns, Hannah O'Driscoll, Eamon Loughman","doi":"10.1186/s41824-025-00243-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Radiomics features have been utilised as group metrics of image quality in many areas of diagnostic radiology. In this pilot study, the relationship between technical metrics used in image quality assurance and visual grading scores provided by a radiologist were evaluated. Image dataset harmonisation allowed comparison between the two and allowed trends to be extracted. We propose a reproducible technique to identify the metrics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review of 30 [<sup>18</sup>F] FDG-PET/CT performed in a nuclear medicine referral centre was performed. Image datasets were reprocessed to correspond to a bed duration of 180, 120, 60, 30 s per bed position and were analysed according to a pre-set bank of semi-quantitative features by a radiology resident. The extraction of radiomic features in PET images was performed using SLICER-RADIOMICS Module version 5.2.2. To facilitate the comparison of radiomic features and radiologist scoring data, normalisation was performed on both data sets. Fréchet distance analysis, Mean Square Error and Mean Absolute Error display the level of agreement between features and radiologist following the rescale of the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 120 reprocessed image datasets, 115 were included in the study. We focused on overall image quality score rather than individual radiomic metrics as this identified the most robust trend. A significant difference in the 30 s image dataset with respect to each group individually and combined for the radiologist overall score was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results show that a large percentage change in certain features can indicate a significant change in quality in clinically processed images.</p>","PeriodicalId":519909,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI reports","volume":"9 1","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12058555/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41824-025-00243-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Radiomics features have been utilised as group metrics of image quality in many areas of diagnostic radiology. In this pilot study, the relationship between technical metrics used in image quality assurance and visual grading scores provided by a radiologist were evaluated. Image dataset harmonisation allowed comparison between the two and allowed trends to be extracted. We propose a reproducible technique to identify the metrics.

Methods: A retrospective chart review of 30 [18F] FDG-PET/CT performed in a nuclear medicine referral centre was performed. Image datasets were reprocessed to correspond to a bed duration of 180, 120, 60, 30 s per bed position and were analysed according to a pre-set bank of semi-quantitative features by a radiology resident. The extraction of radiomic features in PET images was performed using SLICER-RADIOMICS Module version 5.2.2. To facilitate the comparison of radiomic features and radiologist scoring data, normalisation was performed on both data sets. Fréchet distance analysis, Mean Square Error and Mean Absolute Error display the level of agreement between features and radiologist following the rescale of the data.

Results: Of the 120 reprocessed image datasets, 115 were included in the study. We focused on overall image quality score rather than individual radiomic metrics as this identified the most robust trend. A significant difference in the 30 s image dataset with respect to each group individually and combined for the radiologist overall score was observed.

Conclusion: Our results show that a large percentage change in certain features can indicate a significant change in quality in clinically processed images.

[18F] FDG-PET中放射学特征作为图像质量判别度量的实际应用:一项试点研究。
目的:放射组学特征已被用作诊断放射学许多领域图像质量的组度量。在这项初步研究中,评估了用于图像质量保证的技术指标与放射科医生提供的视觉评分之间的关系。图像数据集协调允许在两者之间进行比较,并允许提取趋势。我们提出了一种可重复的技术来识别这些指标。方法:回顾性分析在核医学转诊中心进行的30例[18F] FDG-PET/CT检查。对图像数据集进行重新处理,以对应每个床位位置的病床持续时间为180,120,60,30秒,并根据放射科住院医师预先设置的半定量特征库进行分析。使用SLICER-RADIOMICS Module 5.2.2版本对PET图像进行放射组学特征提取。为了便于比较放射学特征和放射科医生评分数据,对两个数据集进行归一化。光谱距离分析、均方误差和平均绝对误差显示了特征和放射科医生在数据重新缩放后的一致程度。结果:120个重新处理的图像数据集中,115个被纳入研究。我们专注于整体图像质量评分,而不是单个放射学指标,因为这确定了最强劲的趋势。观察到30 s图像数据集相对于每组单独和放射学家总体评分的显着差异。结论:我们的研究结果表明,某些特征的大百分比变化可以表明临床处理图像质量的显著变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信