Utilization and quality among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with high vs low access to telehealth.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf064
Jiani Yu, Lawrence P Casalino, Hye-Young Jung, Derek Lake, Manyao Zhang, Reekarl Pierre, Dhruv Khullar
{"title":"Utilization and quality among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with high vs low access to telehealth.","authors":"Jiani Yu, Lawrence P Casalino, Hye-Young Jung, Derek Lake, Manyao Zhang, Reekarl Pierre, Dhruv Khullar","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Access to telehealth care has increased markedly in recent years, especially for patients in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program. Given the unique features of MA, such as capitated payment and provider networks, understanding the impact of telehealth availability on quality, costs, and utilization is important for informing coverage and payment decisions. We compared quality and utilization outcomes among MA beneficiaries with varying access to telehealth, using MA encounter data from a 20% national random sample of enrollees from 2019 to 2021. We found that high-telehealth access was associated with a 13.4% decrease in in-person evaluation and management (E&M) visits, relative to the period prior to the pandemic onset. Given that this decrease was offset by increases in telehealth E&M visits, there was no change in total E&M visits. High-telehealth access was also associated with a 4.8% decrease in total emergency department (ED) visits, but no differences in preventable ED visits, total hospital admissions, or ambulatory care-sensitive admissions. Increases in telehealth-delivered E&M visits among MA beneficiaries with high-telehealth access offset decreases in in-person-delivered E&M visits. These findings may help clinicians and policymakers contextualize the relationship between broader access to telehealth for MA enrollees and various types of health care utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 4","pages":"qxaf064"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12000525/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf064","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Access to telehealth care has increased markedly in recent years, especially for patients in the Medicare Advantage (MA) program. Given the unique features of MA, such as capitated payment and provider networks, understanding the impact of telehealth availability on quality, costs, and utilization is important for informing coverage and payment decisions. We compared quality and utilization outcomes among MA beneficiaries with varying access to telehealth, using MA encounter data from a 20% national random sample of enrollees from 2019 to 2021. We found that high-telehealth access was associated with a 13.4% decrease in in-person evaluation and management (E&M) visits, relative to the period prior to the pandemic onset. Given that this decrease was offset by increases in telehealth E&M visits, there was no change in total E&M visits. High-telehealth access was also associated with a 4.8% decrease in total emergency department (ED) visits, but no differences in preventable ED visits, total hospital admissions, or ambulatory care-sensitive admissions. Increases in telehealth-delivered E&M visits among MA beneficiaries with high-telehealth access offset decreases in in-person-delivered E&M visits. These findings may help clinicians and policymakers contextualize the relationship between broader access to telehealth for MA enrollees and various types of health care utilization.

医疗保险优势受益人的利用和质量与高与低获得远程医疗。
近年来,获得远程医疗保健的机会显著增加,特别是对医疗保险优势(MA)计划中的患者。考虑到远程医疗的独特特征,如按额支付和提供者网络,了解远程医疗可获得性对质量、成本和利用率的影响对于告知覆盖范围和支付决策非常重要。我们使用2019年至2021年20%的全国随机参保人的MA就诊数据,比较了获得不同远程医疗的MA受益人的质量和利用结果。我们发现,与大流行爆发前相比,高远程医疗访问与亲自评估和管理(E&M)访问减少13.4%相关。考虑到这一减少被远程医疗医疗服务的增加所抵消,医疗服务的总访问量没有变化。高远程医疗访问也与急诊(ED)总访问量减少4.8%相关,但在可预防的ED访问量、住院总人数或对门诊护理敏感的住院人数方面没有差异。在远程医疗可及性高的MA受益人中,远程医疗提供的E&M就诊的增加抵消了亲自提供的E&M就诊的减少。这些发现可以帮助临床医生和政策制定者了解MA登登者更广泛地获得远程医疗与各种类型的医疗保健利用之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信