Irisin and its role in fracture healing: A comparative study with hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma in a rat model.

IF 1.9 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ahmet Emrah Açan, Mert Emre Aydın, Özgür Bulmuş, Emrah Özcan, Aslı Karakılıç, Gülay Turan, Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu
{"title":"Irisin and its role in fracture healing: A comparative study with hyaluronic acid and platelet-rich plasma in a rat model.","authors":"Ahmet Emrah Açan, Mert Emre Aydın, Özgür Bulmuş, Emrah Özcan, Aslı Karakılıç, Gülay Turan, Reşit Buğra Hüsemoğlu","doi":"10.52312/jdrs.2025.2097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the effects of local irisin (IR) injections on closed femoral fractures in rats and to compare its efficacy to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 64 male Wistar albino rats were divided into four equal groups: a control group that received no treatment and three experimental groups that received local injections of HA, PRP, or recombinant IR at the fracture site. All rats underwent a standard bilateral closed femoral shaft fracture and intramedullary fixation. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, sacrificed at Week 2 and Week 4. The right femurs were used for radiological examination with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and subsequent histological analysis, while the left femurs were reserved for biomechanical testing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By Week 2, the IR and PRP groups showed statistically significantly higher scores for the transformation of fibrous cartilage into bone tissue compared to the control group (7.88±0.6, p=0.0001, and 6±0.8, p=0.036, respectively). By Week 4, transformation scores in the IR group increased to 9.25±0.7, statistically significantly exceeding the control group (p=0.0001). Bone volume was also statistically significantly greater in the IR group (5.21±0.5 mm<sup>3</sup> at Week 2; 5.94±0.8 mm<sup>3</sup> at Week 4) compared to the control group (p=0.001) and the PRP group (p=0.003) at Week 2, and compared to the control group (p=0.001), the HA group (p=0.042), and the PRP group (p=0.014) at Week 4. Additionally, maximum strength in the IR group was statistically significantly higher than in the control group (p=0.0001) and the PRP group (p=0.048) at Week 2. By Week 4, the IR group was also statistically significantly higher compared to the control group (p=0.0001), the HA group (p=0.037) and the PRP group (p=0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study is one of the first to demonstrate the potential of administering local IR via injection into the fracture hematoma to accelerate fracture healing. The superior efficacy of IR over HA and PRP may be explained by its ability to enhance osteoblast activity, promote vascularization, and reduce inflammation, creating an optimal environment for bone regeneration. Unlike PRP, which primarily delivers growth factors, and HA, which supports cell migration and proliferation, IR appears to directly influence the bone microenvironment, expediting callus transformation. These findings suggest that IR may play a significant role in improving outcomes for patients at risk of delayed union. However, further clinical trials in humans are necessary to confirm its efficacy and safety for clinical applications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73560,"journal":{"name":"Joint diseases and related surgery","volume":"36 2","pages":"328-339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12086494/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Joint diseases and related surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2025.2097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of local irisin (IR) injections on closed femoral fractures in rats and to compare its efficacy to platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA).

Materials and methods: A total of 64 male Wistar albino rats were divided into four equal groups: a control group that received no treatment and three experimental groups that received local injections of HA, PRP, or recombinant IR at the fracture site. All rats underwent a standard bilateral closed femoral shaft fracture and intramedullary fixation. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, sacrificed at Week 2 and Week 4. The right femurs were used for radiological examination with micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) and subsequent histological analysis, while the left femurs were reserved for biomechanical testing.

Results: By Week 2, the IR and PRP groups showed statistically significantly higher scores for the transformation of fibrous cartilage into bone tissue compared to the control group (7.88±0.6, p=0.0001, and 6±0.8, p=0.036, respectively). By Week 4, transformation scores in the IR group increased to 9.25±0.7, statistically significantly exceeding the control group (p=0.0001). Bone volume was also statistically significantly greater in the IR group (5.21±0.5 mm3 at Week 2; 5.94±0.8 mm3 at Week 4) compared to the control group (p=0.001) and the PRP group (p=0.003) at Week 2, and compared to the control group (p=0.001), the HA group (p=0.042), and the PRP group (p=0.014) at Week 4. Additionally, maximum strength in the IR group was statistically significantly higher than in the control group (p=0.0001) and the PRP group (p=0.048) at Week 2. By Week 4, the IR group was also statistically significantly higher compared to the control group (p=0.0001), the HA group (p=0.037) and the PRP group (p=0.009).

Conclusion: The present study is one of the first to demonstrate the potential of administering local IR via injection into the fracture hematoma to accelerate fracture healing. The superior efficacy of IR over HA and PRP may be explained by its ability to enhance osteoblast activity, promote vascularization, and reduce inflammation, creating an optimal environment for bone regeneration. Unlike PRP, which primarily delivers growth factors, and HA, which supports cell migration and proliferation, IR appears to directly influence the bone microenvironment, expediting callus transformation. These findings suggest that IR may play a significant role in improving outcomes for patients at risk of delayed union. However, further clinical trials in humans are necessary to confirm its efficacy and safety for clinical applications.

鸢尾素及其在骨折愈合中的作用:大鼠模型中透明质酸和富血小板血浆的比较研究。
目的:探讨鸢尾素(irisin, IR)局部注射对闭合性股骨骨折大鼠的影响,并与富血小板血浆(PRP)和透明质酸(HA)的疗效进行比较。材料与方法:雄性Wistar白化大鼠64只,随机分为4组,对照组不给予治疗,实验组在骨折部位局部注射HA、PRP或重组IR。所有大鼠均接受标准双侧闭合性股骨干骨折和髓内固定。各组再分为2个亚组,分别于第2周和第4周处死。右股骨用于显微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)放射学检查和随后的组织学分析,而左股骨保留用于生物力学测试。结果:第2周时,IR组和PRP组纤维软骨向骨组织转化得分均高于对照组(分别为7.88±0.6,p=0.0001和6±0.8,p=0.036)。到第4周,IR组转化评分为9.25±0.7,显著高于对照组(p=0.0001)。IR组骨体积也有统计学意义(5.21±0.5 mm3);第2周与对照组(p=0.001)、PRP组(p=0.003)比较,第4周与对照组(p=0.001)、HA组(p=0.042)、PRP组(p=0.014)比较,分别为5.94±0.8 mm3。此外,在第2周,IR组的最大强度显著高于对照组(p=0.0001)和PRP组(p=0.048)。到第4周时,与对照组(p=0.0001)、HA组(p=0.037)和PRP组(p=0.009)相比,IR组也有统计学意义显著升高。结论:本研究是第一个证明通过注射局部IR进入骨折血肿加速骨折愈合潜力的研究之一。IR优于HA和PRP的功效可能是由于其能够增强成骨细胞活性,促进血管形成,减少炎症,为骨再生创造最佳环境。与主要提供生长因子的PRP和支持细胞迁移和增殖的HA不同,IR似乎直接影响骨微环境,加速愈伤组织转化。这些发现表明,IR可能在改善延迟愈合风险患者的预后方面发挥重要作用。然而,需要进一步的人体临床试验来证实其临床应用的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信