Deprescribing Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonists in Older Adults and People With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.

Aisling M McEvoy, Aili V Langford, Shin J Liau, Darshna Goordeen, Emily Reeve, Justin P Turner
{"title":"Deprescribing Benzodiazepine Receptor Agonists in Older Adults and People With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Aisling M McEvoy, Aili V Langford, Shin J Liau, Darshna Goordeen, Emily Reeve, Justin P Turner","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) (benzodiazepines and z-drugs) may provide limited benefits in the management of insomnia when used short-term. However, they increase the risk of harms including falls, fractures, hospitalizations, and cognitive impairment. Deprescribing (cessation) of BZRAs may be beneficial for older adults and people living with cognitive impairment as they are at heightened risk of adverse events. This review investigated the effects of patient-directed, non-pharmacological interventions to support deprescribing of BZRAs used for insomnia in older adults and people living with cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Medline were searched in January 2024 with no publication date restrictions. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments (ROB2 for randomized studies, ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies) were conducted independently by two authors. Outcomes of interest included the proportion of participants who ceased BZRAs, reduction in BZRAs, switching to another medication, sleep outcomes, and clinical outcomes. Studies were included if they investigated BZRA deprescribing in older adults (≥ 65 years) or people living with cognitive impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen reports analyzing 16 studies in hospital, community, and aged care settings were included. BZRA cessation rates ranged between 23% to 72% for written education (n = 6); 14% to 57% for combined written and verbal education (n = 5); and 9% to 100% for multi-component interventions (n = 6). One report investigated a BZRA deprescribing educational intervention in people with cognitive impairment and found comparable effectiveness to participants without cognitive impairment. Most studies were at a high risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patient-directed interventions led to BZRA cessation, although there was significant variability between studies. It is unknown if all interventions examined are similarly effective for people living with cognitive impairment. Further research investigating approaches to deprescribing BZRAs in older adults or people with cognitive impairment is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BZRAs) (benzodiazepines and z-drugs) may provide limited benefits in the management of insomnia when used short-term. However, they increase the risk of harms including falls, fractures, hospitalizations, and cognitive impairment. Deprescribing (cessation) of BZRAs may be beneficial for older adults and people living with cognitive impairment as they are at heightened risk of adverse events. This review investigated the effects of patient-directed, non-pharmacological interventions to support deprescribing of BZRAs used for insomnia in older adults and people living with cognitive impairment.

Methods: Embase, CENTRAL, Scopus, and Medline were searched in January 2024 with no publication date restrictions. Screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessments (ROB2 for randomized studies, ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies) were conducted independently by two authors. Outcomes of interest included the proportion of participants who ceased BZRAs, reduction in BZRAs, switching to another medication, sleep outcomes, and clinical outcomes. Studies were included if they investigated BZRA deprescribing in older adults (≥ 65 years) or people living with cognitive impairment.

Results: Seventeen reports analyzing 16 studies in hospital, community, and aged care settings were included. BZRA cessation rates ranged between 23% to 72% for written education (n = 6); 14% to 57% for combined written and verbal education (n = 5); and 9% to 100% for multi-component interventions (n = 6). One report investigated a BZRA deprescribing educational intervention in people with cognitive impairment and found comparable effectiveness to participants without cognitive impairment. Most studies were at a high risk of bias.

Conclusions: Patient-directed interventions led to BZRA cessation, although there was significant variability between studies. It is unknown if all interventions examined are similarly effective for people living with cognitive impairment. Further research investigating approaches to deprescribing BZRAs in older adults or people with cognitive impairment is required.

老年人和认知障碍患者苯二氮卓受体激动剂的处方解除:系统综述。
背景:苯二氮卓类受体激动剂(BZRAs)(苯二氮卓类药物和z-药物)短期使用对失眠的治疗效果有限。然而,它们增加了伤害的风险,包括跌倒、骨折、住院和认知障碍。减轻(停止)BZRAs的处方可能对老年人和认知障碍患者有益,因为他们有较高的不良事件风险。本综述调查了以患者为导向的非药物干预措施的效果,以支持老年人和有认知障碍的人使用BZRAs来治疗失眠。方法:检索Embase、CENTRAL、Scopus和Medline,检索时间为2024年1月,无发表日期限制。筛选、数据提取和偏倚风险评估(随机研究为ROB2,非随机研究为robins - 1)由两位作者独立进行。关注的结果包括停止BZRAs的参与者比例、BZRAs的减少、切换到另一种药物、睡眠结果和临床结果。如果研究对象为老年人(≥65岁)或认知障碍患者,则纳入BZRA处方。结果:17篇报告分析了医院、社区和老年护理机构的16项研究。书面教育的BZRA戒烟率在23%至72%之间(n = 6);14%至57%的学生接受书面和口头结合教育(n = 5);多组分干预为9% ~ 100% (n = 6)。一份报告调查了认知障碍患者的BZRA描述教育干预,发现与没有认知障碍的参与者相当的有效性。大多数研究存在高偏倚风险。结论:患者导向的干预导致BZRA的停止,尽管研究之间存在显著的差异。目前尚不清楚是否所有的干预措施对认知障碍患者都同样有效。需要进一步研究如何在老年人或认知障碍患者中减少BZRAs的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信