An Objective Method to Determine Nurse Staffing for an Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Hospital Unit: Discrete Event Simulation.

Sandra F Simmons, Emily K Hollingsworth, Jason M Slagle, Jennifer Kim, Lucy Wilson, Avantika Shah, Mariu C Duggan, John F Schnelle
{"title":"An Objective Method to Determine Nurse Staffing for an Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Hospital Unit: Discrete Event Simulation.","authors":"Sandra F Simmons, Emily K Hollingsworth, Jason M Slagle, Jennifer Kim, Lucy Wilson, Avantika Shah, Mariu C Duggan, John F Schnelle","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19507","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many hospitals have acute care for elders (ACE) units or engage in programs to enhance care for older inpatients. However, few studies have objectively evaluated nurse staffing models to support care for older inpatients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study applied discrete event simulation (DES) to an ACE unit to objectively evaluate registered nurse (RN) and nursing assistant (NA) staffing allocations. Research staff collected standardized, objective data related to nursing tasks and time requirements to model the ACE unit clinical care environment and evaluate varying RN and NA staffing allocations on measures of nursing workload, care quality, and care efficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On a 22-bed ACE unit, 85% of patients were aged 65 or older, 37% had cognitive impairment, and 89% required toileting and/or mobility assistance. Nurse care routines were interrupted frequently by unscheduled patient care requests, with an average frequency of 6.1 (±1.6) requests per hour. DES was used to simulate four different RN and NA staffing allocations. Results showed the most common staffing (four RNs and one NA) resulted in the highest nursing workload rates (89% and 88% for RNs and NAs, respectively) and the highest rate of predicted care omissions (6.2%). Additionally, RNs were predicted to help with 83% of NA care tasks related to toileting and mobility assistance. Alternative allocations of four RNs and three NAs or five RNs and two NAs resulted in more feasible workload rates, lower rates of care omissions, and less reliance on RNs for NA care tasks.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DES provides an objective method to identify nurse staffing needs for an ACE hospital unit. This approach can be used to safely evaluate the potential impact of varying nurse staffing allocations. The DES model for the ACE unit is adaptable to other types of hospital units that care for older patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19507","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many hospitals have acute care for elders (ACE) units or engage in programs to enhance care for older inpatients. However, few studies have objectively evaluated nurse staffing models to support care for older inpatients.

Methods: This study applied discrete event simulation (DES) to an ACE unit to objectively evaluate registered nurse (RN) and nursing assistant (NA) staffing allocations. Research staff collected standardized, objective data related to nursing tasks and time requirements to model the ACE unit clinical care environment and evaluate varying RN and NA staffing allocations on measures of nursing workload, care quality, and care efficiency.

Results: On a 22-bed ACE unit, 85% of patients were aged 65 or older, 37% had cognitive impairment, and 89% required toileting and/or mobility assistance. Nurse care routines were interrupted frequently by unscheduled patient care requests, with an average frequency of 6.1 (±1.6) requests per hour. DES was used to simulate four different RN and NA staffing allocations. Results showed the most common staffing (four RNs and one NA) resulted in the highest nursing workload rates (89% and 88% for RNs and NAs, respectively) and the highest rate of predicted care omissions (6.2%). Additionally, RNs were predicted to help with 83% of NA care tasks related to toileting and mobility assistance. Alternative allocations of four RNs and three NAs or five RNs and two NAs resulted in more feasible workload rates, lower rates of care omissions, and less reliance on RNs for NA care tasks.

Conclusions: DES provides an objective method to identify nurse staffing needs for an ACE hospital unit. This approach can be used to safely evaluate the potential impact of varying nurse staffing allocations. The DES model for the ACE unit is adaptable to other types of hospital units that care for older patients.

一种确定老年急症护理(ACE)医院护理人员配置的客观方法:离散事件模拟。
背景:许多医院有老年人急症护理(ACE)单位或从事计划,以加强对老年住院病人的护理。然而,很少有研究客观地评估护士配备模式,以支持老年住院患者的护理。方法:本研究采用离散事件模拟(DES)方法对ACE单位的注册护士(RN)和护理助理(NA)人员配置进行客观评价。研究人员收集与护理任务和时间要求相关的标准化、客观数据,对ACE单位临床护理环境进行建模,并根据护理工作量、护理质量和护理效率评估不同的注册护士和注册护士人员配置。结果:在一个22张床位的ACE病房中,85%的患者年龄在65岁或以上,37%有认知障碍,89%需要如厕所和/或行动辅助。护士的日常护理经常被计划外的患者护理请求打断,平均频率为每小时6.1(±1.6)次。使用DES模拟四种不同的注册护士和注册护士人员配置。结果显示,最常见的人员配置(4名注册护士和1名注册护士)导致最高的护理工作量率(注册护士和注册护士分别为89%和88%)和最高的预测护理遗漏率(6.2%)。此外,预计注册护士可以帮助完成83%的与如厕和行动辅助相关的护理任务。4个注册护士和3个NAs或5个注册护士和2个NAs的可选分配导致更可行的工作量率,更低的护理遗漏率,以及更少地依赖注册护士来完成NA护理任务。结论:DES提供了一种客观的方法来确定ACE医院单位的护士配置需求。这种方法可用于安全评估不同护士人员配置的潜在影响。ACE病房的DES模式适用于其他类型的老年患者护理医院病房。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信