Prospective external validation of the automated PIPRA multivariable prediction model for postoperative delirium on real-world data from a consecutive cohort of non-cardiac surgery inpatients.

IF 4.1 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kelly A Reeve, Nayeli Schmutz Gelsomino, Michela Venturini, Felix Buddeberg, Martin Zozman, Reto Stocker, Mary-Anne Kedda, Philipp Meier, Marius Möller, Simone Pascale Wildhaber, Benjamin T Dodsworth
{"title":"Prospective external validation of the automated PIPRA multivariable prediction model for postoperative delirium on real-world data from a consecutive cohort of non-cardiac surgery inpatients.","authors":"Kelly A Reeve, Nayeli Schmutz Gelsomino, Michela Venturini, Felix Buddeberg, Martin Zozman, Reto Stocker, Mary-Anne Kedda, Philipp Meier, Marius Möller, Simone Pascale Wildhaber, Benjamin T Dodsworth","doi":"10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication in surgical patients over 60, increasing morbidity, mortality and hospital stays. While international guidelines recommend risk screening, resource constraints limit implementation. This study externally validated the Pre-Interventional Preventive Risk Assessment (PIPRA) algorithm, a CE-certified tool for identifying high-risk patients to enable targeted prevention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective validation study was conducted at a 335-bed Swiss hospital as part of a quality improvement initiative. Data from 866 patients aged ≥60 undergoing non-cardiac, non-intracranial surgery (May-June 2023) were analysed. The PIPRA model's performance was assessed on discrimination (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC)) and calibration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POD occurred in 11.5% (n=100) of patients. The PIPRA model showed good discrimination (AUROC=0.77, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.82) and generally accurate calibration, though slightly overpredicting risk in high-risk patients. POD was associated with higher mortality, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stays and increased nursing care needs. The model effectively stratified patients for targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The PIPRA algorithm demonstrated robust performance in a real-world setting, affirming its utility for POD risk prediction. The study highlighted the model's applicability across diverse clinical environments, despite differences in patient populations and screening protocols.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The PIPRA algorithm is a reliable tool for identifying surgical patients at risk of POD, supporting early intervention strategies to improve patient outcomes. Its integration into clinical workflows may enhance POD prevention efforts and optimise resource allocation in perioperative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9050,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11987130/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Health & Care Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2024-101291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a common complication in surgical patients over 60, increasing morbidity, mortality and hospital stays. While international guidelines recommend risk screening, resource constraints limit implementation. This study externally validated the Pre-Interventional Preventive Risk Assessment (PIPRA) algorithm, a CE-certified tool for identifying high-risk patients to enable targeted prevention.

Methods: A prospective validation study was conducted at a 335-bed Swiss hospital as part of a quality improvement initiative. Data from 866 patients aged ≥60 undergoing non-cardiac, non-intracranial surgery (May-June 2023) were analysed. The PIPRA model's performance was assessed on discrimination (Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC)) and calibration.

Results: POD occurred in 11.5% (n=100) of patients. The PIPRA model showed good discrimination (AUROC=0.77, 95% CI: 0.72 to 0.82) and generally accurate calibration, though slightly overpredicting risk in high-risk patients. POD was associated with higher mortality, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU)/hospital stays and increased nursing care needs. The model effectively stratified patients for targeted interventions.

Discussion: The PIPRA algorithm demonstrated robust performance in a real-world setting, affirming its utility for POD risk prediction. The study highlighted the model's applicability across diverse clinical environments, despite differences in patient populations and screening protocols.

Conclusions: The PIPRA algorithm is a reliable tool for identifying surgical patients at risk of POD, supporting early intervention strategies to improve patient outcomes. Its integration into clinical workflows may enhance POD prevention efforts and optimise resource allocation in perioperative care.

基于非心脏手术住院患者连续队列真实数据的PIPRA术后谵妄多变量自动预测模型的前瞻性外部验证
目的:术后谵妄(POD)是60岁以上外科患者的常见并发症,增加了发病率、死亡率和住院时间。虽然国际准则建议进行风险筛查,但资源限制限制了实施。本研究外部验证了介入前预防风险评估(PIPRA)算法,该算法是ce认证的识别高危患者以实现针对性预防的工具。方法:在一家拥有335张床位的瑞士医院进行前瞻性验证研究,作为质量改进计划的一部分。分析了866例年龄≥60岁的非心脏、非颅内手术患者(2023年5 - 6月)的数据。通过识别(Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Area Under Area of Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve, AUROC)和校准来评估PIPRA模型的性能。结果:11.5% (n=100)的患者发生POD。PIPRA模型具有良好的辨别能力(AUROC=0.77, 95% CI: 0.72 ~ 0.82),校正总体准确,但对高危患者的风险预测略高。POD与死亡率较高、重症监护病房(ICU)/住院时间延长和护理需求增加有关。该模型有效地将患者分层进行针对性干预。讨论:PIPRA算法在现实环境中表现出强大的性能,证实了其在POD风险预测中的实用性。该研究强调了该模型在不同临床环境中的适用性,尽管患者群体和筛查方案存在差异。结论:PIPRA算法是识别手术患者POD风险的可靠工具,支持早期干预策略以改善患者预后。将其整合到临床工作流程中可以加强POD预防工作并优化围手术期护理的资源分配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
40
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信