Comparative evaluation of intraoral stent materials: dosimetric response analysis.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Gabriela Corati Touguinha, Alberto E Gonzales-Ccoscco, Leonardo Pessoa da Silva, Henrique Trombini, Heitor Ribeiro Birnfeld, Luzia Fernandes Millão, Romulo Rocha Santos, José Fernando Marquez Pachas, Oliver Paucar, Carmen Calcina, Mirko Salomón Alva-Sánchez
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of intraoral stent materials: dosimetric response analysis.","authors":"Gabriela Corati Touguinha, Alberto E Gonzales-Ccoscco, Leonardo Pessoa da Silva, Henrique Trombini, Heitor Ribeiro Birnfeld, Luzia Fernandes Millão, Romulo Rocha Santos, José Fernando Marquez Pachas, Oliver Paucar, Carmen Calcina, Mirko Salomón Alva-Sánchez","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/add6ac","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Purpose</i>. To evaluate and compare the dosimetric properties of various materials used in intraoral stents, with a particular focus on their interaction with a 6 MV photon beam in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.<i>Materials and Methods</i>. Experimental irradiation and computational simulation methods were employed to analyze the interaction of various materials with a 6 MV photon beam used in an intraoral procedure. A head phantom, cylindrical in shape and divided into 1 cm plates, was used along with circular PMMA plates and polystyrene to simulate an intraoral procedure. Radiochromic film (EBT3) was used to evaluate the dose-response of PMMA and PET-G materials with thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm, irradiated under a 10 × 10 cm<sup>2</sup>field size at a 100 cm source-to-skin distance (SSD). The PENELOPE code was used to simulate the dosimetric properties of PMMA, PET-G, EVA, PDMS, and PVDF based on their chemical compositions.<i>Results</i>. A maximum divergence of 4.2% was observed between PET-G and PMMA at a thickness of 3 mm during the experimental procedure. Additionally, a maximum difference of 1.2% was noted when comparing the simulated percentage depth dose curves. Discrepancies of up to 10% were found between experimental irradiation and simulations in polystyrene regions, likely due to the sensitivity of the film to incident fluence. When comparing the simulated materials (PMMA, PET-G, EVA, PDMS, and PVDF), the largest divergence observed was 20% at the surface of the phantom and did not exceed 15% at depths under 10 cm, specifically between PVDF and PMMA. For all other materials, the divergence remained below 10% across all regions.<i>Conclusions</i>. The results suggest that all the materials evaluated for intraoral stent fabrication can be effectively analyzed using the simulation code. PET-G, EVA, and PDMS showed dose-response variations of less than 10%, which should be considered when calculating doses in the treatment system planning, as stents made from these materials may increase the dose to nearby organs.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/add6ac","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose. To evaluate and compare the dosimetric properties of various materials used in intraoral stents, with a particular focus on their interaction with a 6 MV photon beam in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.Materials and Methods. Experimental irradiation and computational simulation methods were employed to analyze the interaction of various materials with a 6 MV photon beam used in an intraoral procedure. A head phantom, cylindrical in shape and divided into 1 cm plates, was used along with circular PMMA plates and polystyrene to simulate an intraoral procedure. Radiochromic film (EBT3) was used to evaluate the dose-response of PMMA and PET-G materials with thicknesses of 1, 2, and 3 mm, irradiated under a 10 × 10 cm2field size at a 100 cm source-to-skin distance (SSD). The PENELOPE code was used to simulate the dosimetric properties of PMMA, PET-G, EVA, PDMS, and PVDF based on their chemical compositions.Results. A maximum divergence of 4.2% was observed between PET-G and PMMA at a thickness of 3 mm during the experimental procedure. Additionally, a maximum difference of 1.2% was noted when comparing the simulated percentage depth dose curves. Discrepancies of up to 10% were found between experimental irradiation and simulations in polystyrene regions, likely due to the sensitivity of the film to incident fluence. When comparing the simulated materials (PMMA, PET-G, EVA, PDMS, and PVDF), the largest divergence observed was 20% at the surface of the phantom and did not exceed 15% at depths under 10 cm, specifically between PVDF and PMMA. For all other materials, the divergence remained below 10% across all regions.Conclusions. The results suggest that all the materials evaluated for intraoral stent fabrication can be effectively analyzed using the simulation code. PET-G, EVA, and PDMS showed dose-response variations of less than 10%, which should be considered when calculating doses in the treatment system planning, as stents made from these materials may increase the dose to nearby organs.

口内支架材料的比较评价:剂量反应分析。
本研究旨在研究用于口腔内支架的材料,并比较它们的性能和对聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)的剂量学反应。采用实验辐照和计算模拟的方法,分析了不同材料与6 MV光子束在口腔内的相互作用。一个圆柱形的头部假体,分成1厘米的板,与圆形PMMA板和聚苯乙烯一起使用来模拟口腔内手术。使用放射致色膜(EBT3)来评估厚度为1,2,3 mm的PMMA和PET-G材料在100 cm源皮肤距离(SSD)下以10 x 10 cm²的场尺寸照射时的剂量响应。PENELOPE代码基于PMMA、PET-G、EVA、PDMS和PVDF的化学成分模拟了它们的剂量学性质。在实验过程中,PET-G和PMMA在3 mm厚度处的最大差异为4.2%。此外,在比较模拟的百分比深度剂量曲线时,最大差异为1.2%。在聚苯乙烯区域的实验辐照和模拟之间发现了高达10%的差异,这可能是由于薄膜对入射影响的敏感性。在比较模拟材料(PMMA、PET-G、EVA、PDMS和PVDF)时,观察到的最大差异在假体表面为20%,在10厘米以下深度不超过15%,特别是在PVDF和PMMA之间。对于所有其他材料,所有地区的差异仍低于10%。结果表明,该仿真程序可以有效地分析所有用于口腔内支架制作的材料。PET-G、EVA和PDMS显示的剂量-反应变化小于10%,在治疗系统计划中计算剂量时应考虑到这一点,因为由这些材料制成的支架可能会增加对附近器官的剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信