Optimising neonatal services for very preterm births between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks gestation in England: the OPTI-PREM mixed-methods study.

Thillagavathie Pillay, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Natalie Armstrong, Sarah E Seaton, Miaoqing Yang, Victor L Banda, Kelvin Dawson, Abdul Qt Ismail, Vasiliki Bountziouka, Caroline Cupit, Alexis Paton, Bradley N Manktelow, Elizabeth S Draper, Neena Modi, Helen E Campbell, Elaine M Boyle
{"title":"Optimising neonatal services for very preterm births between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks gestation in England: the OPTI-PREM mixed-methods study.","authors":"Thillagavathie Pillay, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Natalie Armstrong, Sarah E Seaton, Miaoqing Yang, Victor L Banda, Kelvin Dawson, Abdul Qt Ismail, Vasiliki Bountziouka, Caroline Cupit, Alexis Paton, Bradley N Manktelow, Elizabeth S Draper, Neena Modi, Helen E Campbell, Elaine M Boyle","doi":"10.3310/JYWC6538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate, for preterm babies born between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks gestation in England, optimal place of birth and early care.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Mixed methods.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>National Health Service neonatal care, England.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To investigate whether birth and early care in neonatal intensive care units (tertiary units) compared to local neonatal units (non-tertiary units) influenced gestation-specific survival and other major outcomes, we analysed data from the National Neonatal Research Database, for 29,842 babies born between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks gestation and discharged from neonatal care between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. We utilised an instrumental variable (maternal excess travel time between local neonatal units and neonatal intensive care units) to control for unmeasured differences. Sensitivity analyses excluded postnatal transfers within 72 hours of birth and multiple births. Outcome measures were death in neonatal care, infant mortality, necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, severe brain injury, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and receipt of breast milk at discharge. We also analysed outcomes by volume of neonatal intensive care activity. We undertook a health economic analysis using a cost-effectiveness evaluation from a National Health Service perspective and using additional lives saved as a measure of benefit, explored differences in quality of care in high compared with low-performing units and performed ethnographic qualitative research.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The safe gestational age cut-off for babies to be born between 27<sup>+0</sup> and 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks and early care at either location was 28 weeks. We found no effect on mortality in neonatal care (mean difference -0.001; 99% confidence interval -0.011 to 0.010; <i>p</i> = 0.842) or in infancy (mean difference -0.002; 99% confidence interval -0.014 to 0.009; <i>p</i> = 0.579) (<i>n</i> = 18,847), including after sensitivity analyses. A significantly greater proportion of babies in local neonatal units had severe brain injury (mean difference -0.011; 99% confidence interval -0.022 to -0.001; <i>p</i> = 0.007) with the highest mean difference in babies born at 27 weeks (-0.040). Those transferred in the first 72 hours were more likely to have severe brain injury. For 27 weeks gestation, birth in centres with neonatal intensive care units reduced the risk of severe brain injury by 4.2% from 11.9% to 7.7%. The number needed to treat was 25 (99% confidence interval 10 to 59) indicating that 25 babies at 27 weeks would have to be delivered in a neonatal intensive care unit to prevent one severe brain injury. For babies born at 27 weeks gestation, birth in a high-volume unit (> 1600 intensive care days/year) reduced the risk of severe brain injury from 0.242 to 0.028 [99% confidence interval 0.035 to 0.542; <i>p</i> = 0.003; number needed to treat = 4 (99% confidence interval 2 to 29)]. Estimated annual total costs of neonatal care were £262 million. The mean (standard deviation) cost per baby varied from £75,594 (£34,874) at 27 weeks to £27,401 (£14,947) at 31 weeks. Costs were similar between neonatal intensive care units and local neonatal units for births at 27<sup>+0</sup> to 29<sup>+6</sup> weeks gestation, but higher for local neonatal units for those born at 30<sup>+0</sup> to 31<sup>+6</sup> weeks. No difference in additional lives saved were observed between the settings. These results suggested that neonatal intensive care units are likely to represent value for money for the National Health Service. However, careful interpretation of this results should be exercised due to the ethical and practical concerns around the reorganisation of neonatal care for very preterm babies from local neonatal units to neonatal intensive care units purely on the grounds of cost savings. We identified a mean reduction in length of stay (1 day; 95% confidence interval 1.029 to 1.081; <i>p</i> < 0.001) in higher-performing units, based on adherence to evidence- and consensus-based measures. Staff reported that decision-making to optimise capacity for babies was an important part of their work. Parents reported valuing their baby's development, homecoming, continuity of care, inclusion in decision-making, and support for their emotional and physical well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Birth and early care for babies ≥ 28 weeks is safe in both neonatal intensive care units and local neonatal units in England. For anticipated births at 27 weeks, antenatal transfer of mothers to centres colocated with neonatal intensive care units should be supported. When these inadvertently occur in centres with local neonatal units, clinicians should risk assess decisions for postnatal transfer, taking patient care requirements, staff skills and healthcare resources into consideration and counselling parents regarding the increased risk of severe brain injury associated with transfer.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>This study is registered as Current Controlled Trials NCT02994849 and ISRCTN74230187.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 15/70/104) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 13, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"13 12","pages":"1-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/JYWC6538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To investigate, for preterm babies born between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks gestation in England, optimal place of birth and early care.

Design: Mixed methods.

Setting: National Health Service neonatal care, England.

Methods: To investigate whether birth and early care in neonatal intensive care units (tertiary units) compared to local neonatal units (non-tertiary units) influenced gestation-specific survival and other major outcomes, we analysed data from the National Neonatal Research Database, for 29,842 babies born between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks gestation and discharged from neonatal care between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018. We utilised an instrumental variable (maternal excess travel time between local neonatal units and neonatal intensive care units) to control for unmeasured differences. Sensitivity analyses excluded postnatal transfers within 72 hours of birth and multiple births. Outcome measures were death in neonatal care, infant mortality, necrotising enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, severe brain injury, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and receipt of breast milk at discharge. We also analysed outcomes by volume of neonatal intensive care activity. We undertook a health economic analysis using a cost-effectiveness evaluation from a National Health Service perspective and using additional lives saved as a measure of benefit, explored differences in quality of care in high compared with low-performing units and performed ethnographic qualitative research.

Results: The safe gestational age cut-off for babies to be born between 27+0 and 31+6 weeks and early care at either location was 28 weeks. We found no effect on mortality in neonatal care (mean difference -0.001; 99% confidence interval -0.011 to 0.010; p = 0.842) or in infancy (mean difference -0.002; 99% confidence interval -0.014 to 0.009; p = 0.579) (n = 18,847), including after sensitivity analyses. A significantly greater proportion of babies in local neonatal units had severe brain injury (mean difference -0.011; 99% confidence interval -0.022 to -0.001; p = 0.007) with the highest mean difference in babies born at 27 weeks (-0.040). Those transferred in the first 72 hours were more likely to have severe brain injury. For 27 weeks gestation, birth in centres with neonatal intensive care units reduced the risk of severe brain injury by 4.2% from 11.9% to 7.7%. The number needed to treat was 25 (99% confidence interval 10 to 59) indicating that 25 babies at 27 weeks would have to be delivered in a neonatal intensive care unit to prevent one severe brain injury. For babies born at 27 weeks gestation, birth in a high-volume unit (> 1600 intensive care days/year) reduced the risk of severe brain injury from 0.242 to 0.028 [99% confidence interval 0.035 to 0.542; p = 0.003; number needed to treat = 4 (99% confidence interval 2 to 29)]. Estimated annual total costs of neonatal care were £262 million. The mean (standard deviation) cost per baby varied from £75,594 (£34,874) at 27 weeks to £27,401 (£14,947) at 31 weeks. Costs were similar between neonatal intensive care units and local neonatal units for births at 27+0 to 29+6 weeks gestation, but higher for local neonatal units for those born at 30+0 to 31+6 weeks. No difference in additional lives saved were observed between the settings. These results suggested that neonatal intensive care units are likely to represent value for money for the National Health Service. However, careful interpretation of this results should be exercised due to the ethical and practical concerns around the reorganisation of neonatal care for very preterm babies from local neonatal units to neonatal intensive care units purely on the grounds of cost savings. We identified a mean reduction in length of stay (1 day; 95% confidence interval 1.029 to 1.081; p < 0.001) in higher-performing units, based on adherence to evidence- and consensus-based measures. Staff reported that decision-making to optimise capacity for babies was an important part of their work. Parents reported valuing their baby's development, homecoming, continuity of care, inclusion in decision-making, and support for their emotional and physical well-being.

Conclusions: Birth and early care for babies ≥ 28 weeks is safe in both neonatal intensive care units and local neonatal units in England. For anticipated births at 27 weeks, antenatal transfer of mothers to centres colocated with neonatal intensive care units should be supported. When these inadvertently occur in centres with local neonatal units, clinicians should risk assess decisions for postnatal transfer, taking patient care requirements, staff skills and healthcare resources into consideration and counselling parents regarding the increased risk of severe brain injury associated with transfer.

Study registration: This study is registered as Current Controlled Trials NCT02994849 and ISRCTN74230187.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 15/70/104) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 13, No. 12. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

优化英国妊娠27+0至31+6周极早产儿的新生儿服务:OPTI-PREM混合方法研究。
目的:探讨英国妊娠27+0 ~ 31+6周早产儿的最佳出生地点及早期护理。设计:混合方法。地点:英国国家卫生服务机构新生儿护理中心。方法:为了调查新生儿重症监护病房(三级病房)与当地新生儿病房(非三级病房)的出生和早期护理是否会影响妊娠特异性生存和其他主要结局,我们分析了国家新生儿研究数据库的数据,包括2014年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间出生在27+0至31+6周之间并从新生儿护理出院的29,842名婴儿。我们使用一个工具变量(产妇在当地新生儿病房和新生儿重症监护病房之间的额外旅行时间)来控制未测量的差异。敏感性分析排除了出生72小时内的产后转移和多胞胎。结局指标为新生儿护理死亡、婴儿死亡率、坏死性小肠结肠炎、早产儿视网膜病变、严重脑损伤、支气管肺发育不良和出院时接受母乳。我们还分析了新生儿重症监护活动量的结果。我们进行了一项健康经济分析,从国家卫生服务的角度使用成本效益评估,并使用额外拯救的生命作为效益的衡量标准,探讨了高绩效单位与低绩效单位的护理质量差异,并进行了人种学定性研究。结果:27+0 ~ 31+6周出生的婴儿的安全胎龄截止时间为28周。我们发现新生儿护理对死亡率没有影响(平均差值-0.001;99%置信区间-0.011 ~ 0.010;P = 0.842)或婴儿期(平均差值-0.002;99%置信区间-0.014 ~ 0.009;P = 0.579) (n = 18,847),包括敏感性分析后。当地新生儿病房重症脑损伤婴儿比例显著高于其他地区(平均差值-0.011;99%置信区间-0.022 ~ -0.001;P = 0.007), 27周出生的婴儿的平均差异最大(-0.040)。那些在最初72小时内被转移的人更有可能遭受严重的脑损伤。妊娠27周时,在有新生儿重症监护病房的中心分娩,严重脑损伤的风险降低4.2%,从11.9%降至7.7%。需要治疗的人数为25(99%置信区间为10至59),这表明,为了防止一次严重的脑损伤,必须在新生儿重症监护室分娩25个27周的婴儿。对于妊娠27周出生的婴儿,在大容量病房(1600重症监护日/年)出生可将严重脑损伤的风险从0.242降低至0.028[99%置信区间0.035至0.542;p = 0.003;需要治疗的人数= 4(99%置信区间2 ~ 29)]。估计每年新生儿护理总费用为2.62亿英镑。每个婴儿的平均(标准差)成本从27周的75,594英镑(34,874英镑)到31周的27,401英镑(14,947英镑)不等。新生儿重症监护病房和当地新生儿病房在妊娠27+0至29+6周出生的费用相似,但当地新生儿病房在妊娠30+0至31+6周出生的费用更高。在两种设置之间,没有观察到额外挽救生命的差异。这些结果表明,新生儿重症监护病房很可能代表了国民健康服务的物有所值。然而,仔细解释这一结果应行使由于伦理和实际问题,围绕新生儿护理重组非常早产儿从当地新生儿单位到新生儿重症监护单位纯粹是出于节约成本的理由。我们确定了平均住院时间的减少(1天;95%置信区间为1.029 ~ 1.081;p结论:在英国新生儿重症监护病房和当地新生儿病房中,≥28周的婴儿出生和早期护理是安全的。对于预期在27周分娩的孕妇,应支持将其产前转移到设有新生儿重症监护病房的中心。当这些意外发生在有当地新生儿病房的中心时,临床医生应该对产后转移的决定进行风险评估,考虑患者护理要求、工作人员技能和医疗资源,并就转移相关的严重脑损伤风险增加向父母提供咨询。研究注册:本研究注册为当前对照试验NCT02994849和ISRCTN74230187。资助:该奖项由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究方案(NIHR奖号:15/70/104)资助,全文发表在《卫生和社会保健提供研究》上;第13卷,第12号有关进一步的奖励信息,请参阅美国国立卫生研究院资助和奖励网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信