Improving patient care experience in the pediatric emergency department: a systematic review.

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00897-3
Evan Abram, Bhavan Dhaliwal, Banke Oketola, Hoda Badran, Apoorva Gangwani, Peace Eleonu, Carrie Costello, Clara Tam, Terry P Klassen, Elisabete Doyle, Alex Aregbesola
{"title":"Improving patient care experience in the pediatric emergency department: a systematic review.","authors":"Evan Abram, Bhavan Dhaliwal, Banke Oketola, Hoda Badran, Apoorva Gangwani, Peace Eleonu, Carrie Costello, Clara Tam, Terry P Klassen, Elisabete Doyle, Alex Aregbesola","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00897-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of the project was to summarize existing evidence on patient experiences in pediatric emergency departments (EDs). The secondary objectives were to characterize patient care experience in pediatric EDs, identify barriers to optimal patient care in pediatric EDs, and identify equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles influencing pediatric emergency care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review of cohort, cross-sectional, and controlled clinical studies on children's (≤ 21 years) experience in the pediatric ED. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Ovid), CENTRAL (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCO) from inception until September 7, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened articles for primary outcomes involving any health care outcome or health care utilization, along with secondary outcomes of EDI factors influencing patient care. Data were obtained from included studies using narrative and descriptive analysis. The process was strengthened by input from patients, families, and providers on the Manitoba Emergency Advisory Committee, who proposed additional areas for consideration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six articles were included, assessing 12 experiences. All studies were from high-volume centers. The primary outcome data indicated an overall satisfaction being rated positively, with satisfaction levels exceeding 70% despite lower ratings in privacy, communication, and waiting areas. Wait times and speed of care were significantly correlated with satisfaction (r = -0.48, P < 0.01 and r = 0.38, P < 0.01, respectively), noting wait times and privacy as barriers to care. The EDI factor impacting patient experience was race, showing decreased scores for privacy and patient voice for those identifying as non-white.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Even with a high overall satisfaction in the pediatric EDs, aspects influencing the experience can be improved. Wait times, waiting areas, privacy and EDI factor such as race should be addressed to help overcome barriers and improve the care patients receive.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00897-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The primary objective of the project was to summarize existing evidence on patient experiences in pediatric emergency departments (EDs). The secondary objectives were to characterize patient care experience in pediatric EDs, identify barriers to optimal patient care in pediatric EDs, and identify equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) principles influencing pediatric emergency care.

Methods: We performed a systematic review of cohort, cross-sectional, and controlled clinical studies on children's (≤ 21 years) experience in the pediatric ED. We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), PsycInfo (Ovid), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Ovid), CENTRAL (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCO) from inception until September 7, 2023. Two reviewers independently screened articles for primary outcomes involving any health care outcome or health care utilization, along with secondary outcomes of EDI factors influencing patient care. Data were obtained from included studies using narrative and descriptive analysis. The process was strengthened by input from patients, families, and providers on the Manitoba Emergency Advisory Committee, who proposed additional areas for consideration.

Results: Six articles were included, assessing 12 experiences. All studies were from high-volume centers. The primary outcome data indicated an overall satisfaction being rated positively, with satisfaction levels exceeding 70% despite lower ratings in privacy, communication, and waiting areas. Wait times and speed of care were significantly correlated with satisfaction (r = -0.48, P < 0.01 and r = 0.38, P < 0.01, respectively), noting wait times and privacy as barriers to care. The EDI factor impacting patient experience was race, showing decreased scores for privacy and patient voice for those identifying as non-white.

Conclusions: Even with a high overall satisfaction in the pediatric EDs, aspects influencing the experience can be improved. Wait times, waiting areas, privacy and EDI factor such as race should be addressed to help overcome barriers and improve the care patients receive.

改善儿科急诊科患者护理经验:系统综述。
目的:该项目的主要目的是总结儿科急诊科(ed)患者经验的现有证据。次要目标是描述儿科急诊科的患者护理体验,确定儿科急诊科最佳患者护理的障碍,并确定影响儿科急诊护理的公平、多样性和包容性(EDI)原则。方法:我们对儿童(≤21岁)在儿科急诊室的队列、横断面和对照临床研究进行了系统综述。我们检索了MEDLINE (Ovid)、Embase (Ovid)、PsycInfo (Ovid)、Cochrane系统综述数据库(Ovid)、CENTRAL (Ovid)和CINAHL (EBSCO),检索时间从成立到2023年9月7日。两名评论者独立筛选了涉及任何医疗保健结果或医疗保健利用的主要结果的文章,以及影响患者护理的EDI因素的次要结果。数据来自采用叙述和描述性分析的纳入研究。马尼托巴紧急咨询委员会的病人、家属和提供者的投入加强了这一进程,该委员会提出了更多的审议领域。结果:纳入6篇文章,评估12例经验。所有研究均来自高容量中心。主要结果数据表明,总体满意度为积极的,尽管在隐私,沟通和等候区评分较低,但满意度水平超过70%。等待时间和护理速度与满意度显著相关(r = -0.48, P)。结论:即使儿科急诊科的总体满意度较高,影响体验的方面也可以得到改善。应解决等待时间、等待区域、隐私和EDI因素(如种族),以帮助克服障碍并改善患者接受的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信