Michael E O'Callaghan, Monica Casey, Dana Pearl, Olivia Hickey, Anette Fosse, Sigurður E Sigurðsson, David W Savage, Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Kirsi Bykachev, Anndra Parviainen, Holly Parker, Joan Condell, Gerry Leavey, Nigel Hart, Pál Weihe, Maria S Petersen, Liam Glynn
{"title":"COVID-19 open data: An ecological study and international collaboration examining pandemic trends in Northern Periphery arctic countries.","authors":"Michael E O'Callaghan, Monica Casey, Dana Pearl, Olivia Hickey, Anette Fosse, Sigurður E Sigurðsson, David W Savage, Katri Vehviläinen-Julkunen, Kirsi Bykachev, Anndra Parviainen, Holly Parker, Joan Condell, Gerry Leavey, Nigel Hart, Pál Weihe, Maria S Petersen, Liam Glynn","doi":"10.1177/14604582251315588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence generation lagged behind public health responses. This study describes an international collaboration of frontline clinicians who used open data describing COVID-19 trends to generate \"practice-based evidence\". <b>Methods:</b> Open data resources from nine Northern Periphery and Arctic (NPA) countries were harnessed using the open-source programming language 'R' and our collaborations analyses and insights were published on a public-facing website. The website's visualisations guided teleconference discussions from September 2020 to March 2021, focusing on contextualizing national responses, especially in rural regions. <b>Results:</b> This project facilitated shared learning from COVID-19 trends and highlighted key aspects of national responses. Notably, rural NPA regions experienced less COVID-19 cases and mortality in the first year of the pandemic. <b>Conclusion:</b> This international collaborative effort, driven by open data analysis, provided a platform to share real-world insights. The study offers a potential template for future pandemics and emphasises the importance of sustaining open data resources, including granular data like excess mortality, for effective pandemic learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 2","pages":"14604582251315588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251315588","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: In the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic, evidence generation lagged behind public health responses. This study describes an international collaboration of frontline clinicians who used open data describing COVID-19 trends to generate "practice-based evidence". Methods: Open data resources from nine Northern Periphery and Arctic (NPA) countries were harnessed using the open-source programming language 'R' and our collaborations analyses and insights were published on a public-facing website. The website's visualisations guided teleconference discussions from September 2020 to March 2021, focusing on contextualizing national responses, especially in rural regions. Results: This project facilitated shared learning from COVID-19 trends and highlighted key aspects of national responses. Notably, rural NPA regions experienced less COVID-19 cases and mortality in the first year of the pandemic. Conclusion: This international collaborative effort, driven by open data analysis, provided a platform to share real-world insights. The study offers a potential template for future pandemics and emphasises the importance of sustaining open data resources, including granular data like excess mortality, for effective pandemic learning.
期刊介绍:
Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.