A Field-Wide Review and Analysis of Study Materials Used in Psilocybin Trials: Assessment of Two Decades of Research.

Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2025-02-27 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1089/psymed.2024.0019
David B Yaden, Marianna Graziosi, Alexa M Owen, Gabrielle Agin-Liebes, Scott T Aaronson, Katja Ehrmann Allen, Frederick S Barrett, Michael P Bogenschutz, Robin Carhart-Harris, Terence H W Ching, Mary P Cosimano, Alicia Danforth, Alan K Davis, Albert Garcia-Romeu, Roland Griffiths, Charles S Grob, Gerhard Gründer, Natalie Gukasyan, Keith G Heinzerling, Peter S Hendricks, Friederike Holze, David M Horton, Matthew W Johnson, Benjamin Kelmendi, Stephanie Knatz Peck, Michael Koslowski, Matthias E Liechti, Lea J Mertens, Francisco A Moreno, Sandeep M Nayak, Christopher R Nicholas, Katrin H Preller, Nathalie M Rieser, Stephen Ross, Karina Sergi, Jordan Sloshower, Lukasz Smigielski, Dea Siggaard Stenbæk, Franz X Vollenweider, Brandon Weiss, Max Wolff, Mary Elizabeth Yaden
{"title":"A Field-Wide Review and Analysis of Study Materials Used in Psilocybin Trials: Assessment of Two Decades of Research.","authors":"David B Yaden, Marianna Graziosi, Alexa M Owen, Gabrielle Agin-Liebes, Scott T Aaronson, Katja Ehrmann Allen, Frederick S Barrett, Michael P Bogenschutz, Robin Carhart-Harris, Terence H W Ching, Mary P Cosimano, Alicia Danforth, Alan K Davis, Albert Garcia-Romeu, Roland Griffiths, Charles S Grob, Gerhard Gründer, Natalie Gukasyan, Keith G Heinzerling, Peter S Hendricks, Friederike Holze, David M Horton, Matthew W Johnson, Benjamin Kelmendi, Stephanie Knatz Peck, Michael Koslowski, Matthias E Liechti, Lea J Mertens, Francisco A Moreno, Sandeep M Nayak, Christopher R Nicholas, Katrin H Preller, Nathalie M Rieser, Stephen Ross, Karina Sergi, Jordan Sloshower, Lukasz Smigielski, Dea Siggaard Stenbæk, Franz X Vollenweider, Brandon Weiss, Max Wolff, Mary Elizabeth Yaden","doi":"10.1089/psymed.2024.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Serotonergic psychedelics, serotonin 2A receptor agonists such as psilocybin that can result in substantially altered states of consciousness, are used in recreational and research settings. The safety of psychedelic experiences in research settings is supported by controlled physical environments, presence of clinical and medical staff to address emergent issues, screening for personal and family history of potential contraindications, and psychoeducational preparation with psychological support. Research settings typically provide psychoeducation to participants verbally and in writing (e.g., informed consent), and such documents and conversations can provide safety-related information-but may also introduce a wide range of expectancies. Such expectancies might involve the specific character of the acute subjective effects of psychedelics, possible side effects, and anticipated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To better understand the content of this psychoeducation, we gathered study materials from many psilocybin studies conducted in the past two decades in healthy and therapeutic populations. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis to better understand these documents.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While these documents varied substantially between studies, we identified themes intended to lower levels of risk and optimize therapeutic effects from psychedelic treatments. The most frequently coded themes related to (1) biological and physical safety, (2) psychological safety and well-being, (3) aspects of setting, and (4) potential for expectancies. Prioritizing biological and psychological safety was evident in the materials from all sites. Furthermore, we identify potential contributors to expectancy unrelated to safety and suggest that these extrapharmacological elements be studied systematically in future research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ideally, future research should strive to maximize safety while attempting to minimize extraneous expectancies.</p>","PeriodicalId":74590,"journal":{"name":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"3 1","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12060849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychedelic medicine (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/psymed.2024.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Serotonergic psychedelics, serotonin 2A receptor agonists such as psilocybin that can result in substantially altered states of consciousness, are used in recreational and research settings. The safety of psychedelic experiences in research settings is supported by controlled physical environments, presence of clinical and medical staff to address emergent issues, screening for personal and family history of potential contraindications, and psychoeducational preparation with psychological support. Research settings typically provide psychoeducation to participants verbally and in writing (e.g., informed consent), and such documents and conversations can provide safety-related information-but may also introduce a wide range of expectancies. Such expectancies might involve the specific character of the acute subjective effects of psychedelics, possible side effects, and anticipated outcomes.

Methods: To better understand the content of this psychoeducation, we gathered study materials from many psilocybin studies conducted in the past two decades in healthy and therapeutic populations. We conducted a reflexive thematic analysis to better understand these documents.

Results: While these documents varied substantially between studies, we identified themes intended to lower levels of risk and optimize therapeutic effects from psychedelic treatments. The most frequently coded themes related to (1) biological and physical safety, (2) psychological safety and well-being, (3) aspects of setting, and (4) potential for expectancies. Prioritizing biological and psychological safety was evident in the materials from all sites. Furthermore, we identify potential contributors to expectancy unrelated to safety and suggest that these extrapharmacological elements be studied systematically in future research.

Conclusions: Ideally, future research should strive to maximize safety while attempting to minimize extraneous expectancies.

裸盖菇素试验中使用的研究材料的全面回顾和分析:二十年研究的评估。
5 -羟色胺能致幻剂,5 -羟色胺2A受体激动剂,如裸盖菇素,可导致意识状态的实质性改变,用于娱乐和研究环境。研究环境中迷幻体验的安全性得到以下方面的支持:受控的物理环境、临床和医务人员的存在以解决紧急问题、筛查潜在禁忌症的个人和家族史以及心理支持的心理教育准备。研究设置通常以口头和书面形式(例如,知情同意)向参与者提供心理教育,此类文件和对话可以提供与安全相关的信息,但也可能引入广泛的期望。这种预期可能涉及致幻剂急性主观效应的特定特征、可能的副作用和预期的结果。方法:为了更好地理解这种心理教育的内容,我们收集了过去二十年来在健康和治疗人群中进行的许多裸盖菇素研究的研究材料。为了更好地理解这些文件,我们进行了反身性专题分析。结果:虽然这些研究之间的文献差异很大,但我们确定了旨在降低风险水平和优化迷幻治疗效果的主题。最常见的编码主题涉及(1)生物和身体安全,(2)心理安全和幸福,(3)环境方面,以及(4)期望的潜力。所有地点的材料都明显将生物和心理安全放在首位。此外,我们确定了与安全性无关的预期的潜在因素,并建议在未来的研究中对这些药物外因素进行系统研究。结论:理想情况下,未来的研究应努力最大限度地提高安全性,同时尽量减少不必要的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信