Informant accuracy of IQCODE, AD8 and GPCOGi for diagnosis of dementia: does your friend know best?

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jasmine Chingono, Samuel Thomas Creavin, Mark Fish, Sarah Cullum, Antony Bayer, Sarah Purdy, Yoav Ben-Shlomo
{"title":"Informant accuracy of IQCODE, AD8 and GPCOGi for diagnosis of dementia: does your friend know best?","authors":"Jasmine Chingono, Samuel Thomas Creavin, Mark Fish, Sarah Cullum, Antony Bayer, Sarah Purdy, Yoav Ben-Shlomo","doi":"10.1186/s12875-025-02745-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing numbers of people require evaluation for possible dementia. However, research on the accuracy of informant questionnaires in primary care remains limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of IQCODE, AD8, and GPCOGi based on the informant's relationship to the patient. We recruited 240 participants from 21 general practices in South West England. The reference standard for a diagnosis of dementia was made by a specialist clinician using ICD-10 criteria. A threshold of greater than 3.3 on IQCODE, greater or equal to 2 on AD8 and less than 5 on the informant component of GPCOG was used to indicate an abnormal test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 238 participants with informant data, 131 had dementia, 60 had CIND, and 47 had normal cognition. Median informant age was 70 years (IQR 60 years to 78 years). 71% of informants were female and 56% were spouses. On all three questionnaires, compared to spouses, adult descendants tended to score participants more cognitively impaired, whereas friends scored participants less cognitively impaired. However, there was little evidence of difference by informant type once fully adjusted. Sensitivity by informant type ranged from 91 to 100% for IQCODE, 94-100% for AD8 and 99% to100% for GPCOGi. There was no significant difference in sensitivity by informant type. Specificity by informant type ranged from 25 to 79% for IQCODE, 13-75% for AD8 and 17-38% for GPCOGi. Adult descendants tended to have the lowest specificity at 25% (95% CI 10-47%) for IQCODE, 13% (95% CI 3-32%) for AD8 and 17% (95% CI 5-37%) for GPCOGi. Friends tended to have the highest specificity at 79% (95% CI 49-95%) for IQCODE, 75% (95% CI 48-93%) for AD8 and 38% (95% CI 15-64%) for GPCOGi.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An informant of any relationship type, using IQCODE, AD8 or GPCOGi may be useful for ruling out dementia but not for ruling it in. We found no evidence of difference between spouse or adult descendants but friends performed significantly better overall on IQCODE and AD8.</p>","PeriodicalId":72428,"journal":{"name":"BMC primary care","volume":"26 1","pages":"112"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11998444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC primary care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-02745-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing numbers of people require evaluation for possible dementia. However, research on the accuracy of informant questionnaires in primary care remains limited.

Methods: This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of IQCODE, AD8, and GPCOGi based on the informant's relationship to the patient. We recruited 240 participants from 21 general practices in South West England. The reference standard for a diagnosis of dementia was made by a specialist clinician using ICD-10 criteria. A threshold of greater than 3.3 on IQCODE, greater or equal to 2 on AD8 and less than 5 on the informant component of GPCOG was used to indicate an abnormal test.

Results: Of 238 participants with informant data, 131 had dementia, 60 had CIND, and 47 had normal cognition. Median informant age was 70 years (IQR 60 years to 78 years). 71% of informants were female and 56% were spouses. On all three questionnaires, compared to spouses, adult descendants tended to score participants more cognitively impaired, whereas friends scored participants less cognitively impaired. However, there was little evidence of difference by informant type once fully adjusted. Sensitivity by informant type ranged from 91 to 100% for IQCODE, 94-100% for AD8 and 99% to100% for GPCOGi. There was no significant difference in sensitivity by informant type. Specificity by informant type ranged from 25 to 79% for IQCODE, 13-75% for AD8 and 17-38% for GPCOGi. Adult descendants tended to have the lowest specificity at 25% (95% CI 10-47%) for IQCODE, 13% (95% CI 3-32%) for AD8 and 17% (95% CI 5-37%) for GPCOGi. Friends tended to have the highest specificity at 79% (95% CI 49-95%) for IQCODE, 75% (95% CI 48-93%) for AD8 and 38% (95% CI 15-64%) for GPCOGi.

Conclusions: An informant of any relationship type, using IQCODE, AD8 or GPCOGi may be useful for ruling out dementia but not for ruling it in. We found no evidence of difference between spouse or adult descendants but friends performed significantly better overall on IQCODE and AD8.

IQCODE、AD8和GPCOGi诊断痴呆的信息准确性:你的朋友最了解吗?
背景:越来越多的人需要对可能的痴呆进行评估。然而,对初级保健中被调查者问卷准确性的研究仍然有限。方法:本研究基于举报人与患者的关系,评估了IQCODE、AD8和GPCOGi的诊断准确性。我们从英格兰西南部的21家全科诊所招募了240名参与者。痴呆诊断的参考标准由专科临床医生根据ICD-10标准制定。如果IQCODE值大于3.3,AD8值大于等于2,GPCOG值小于5,则提示检测异常。结果:在238名有信息资料的参与者中,131名患有痴呆症,60名患有CIND, 47名认知正常。中位被调查者年龄为70岁(IQR为60至78岁)。71%的举报者为女性,56%为配偶。在所有三份问卷中,与配偶相比,成年后代倾向于给参与者的认知障碍评分更高,而朋友给参与者的认知障碍评分更低。然而,一旦完全调整,几乎没有证据表明不同类型的信息提供者之间存在差异。IQCODE的敏感性为91 -100%,AD8为94-100%,GPCOGi为99% -100%。不同类型告密者的敏感性无显著差异。IQCODE的特异性为25 - 79%,AD8为13-75%,GPCOGi为17-38%。成年后代的IQCODE的最低特异性为25% (95% CI 10-47%), AD8的最低特异性为13% (95% CI 3-32%), GPCOGi的最低特异性为17% (95% CI 5-37%)。对于IQCODE,朋友的特异性最高,为79% (95% CI 49-95%),对于AD8,朋友的特异性为75% (95% CI 48-93%),对于GPCOGi,朋友的特异性为38% (95% CI 15-64%)。结论:任何关系类型的告密者,使用IQCODE, AD8或GPCOGi可能有助于排除痴呆,但不能将其排除在外。我们没有发现配偶或成年后代之间存在差异的证据,但朋友在IQCODE和AD8上的总体表现明显更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信