Safety and Efficacy of Senolytic UBX1325 in Diabetic Macular Edema.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400009
Sharon Klier, Jamie Dananberg, Lauren Masaki, Robert B Bhisitkul, Arshad M Khanani, Raj Maturi, Hani Salehi-Had, Craig H Mallinckrodt, Joshua M Rathmell, Anirvan Ghosh, Przemyslaw Sapieha
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Senolytic UBX1325 in Diabetic Macular Edema.","authors":"Sharon Klier, Jamie Dananberg, Lauren Masaki, Robert B Bhisitkul, Arshad M Khanani, Raj Maturi, Hani Salehi-Had, Craig H Mallinckrodt, Joshua M Rathmell, Anirvan Ghosh, Przemyslaw Sapieha","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We tested the ability of a single intravitreal injection of foselutoclax (hereafter UBX1325), a novel senolytic small molecule inhibitor of antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma-extra large, to mitigate the impact of diabetic macular edema.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with diabetic macular edema with prior suboptimal response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a single intravitreal injection of 10 μg of UBX1325 or sham and were followed for up to 48 weeks. The primary trial objective was to evaluate the safety and side-effect profile of UBX1325 as assessed by ocular and systemic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Our secondary objective was to probe efficacy, defined as mean changes from baseline for UBX1325 versus sham in best corrected visual acuity measured in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (range, 0-100 letters, higher scores indicate better vision) and retinal structure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2021 and April 2022, 65 participants (32.3% women) were randomly assigned to either UBX1325 (n=32) or sham (n=33). There were four TEAEs of Grade 3 or greater in the sham group, of which three were considered serious, while there were five in the UBX1325 group of Grade 3 or greater and considered serious. There were no apparent between-group differences with respect to vital signs, electrocardiograms, or routine blood chemistries. For the secondary outcome of efficacy, the difference between UBX1325 and sham in mean change to week 48 in best corrected visual acuity was 5.6 more ETDRS letters (95% confidence interval, -1.5 to 12.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this sham-controlled trial there were no TEAEs that led to discontinuation of treatment with UBX1325 compared with sham. There were trends suggestive of potential efficacy; larger trials are needed to further evaluate these findings. (Funded by UNITY Biotechnology; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04857996.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 5","pages":"EVIDoa2400009"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We tested the ability of a single intravitreal injection of foselutoclax (hereafter UBX1325), a novel senolytic small molecule inhibitor of antiapoptotic protein B-cell lymphoma-extra large, to mitigate the impact of diabetic macular edema.

Methods: Patients with diabetic macular edema with prior suboptimal response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a single intravitreal injection of 10 μg of UBX1325 or sham and were followed for up to 48 weeks. The primary trial objective was to evaluate the safety and side-effect profile of UBX1325 as assessed by ocular and systemic treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Our secondary objective was to probe efficacy, defined as mean changes from baseline for UBX1325 versus sham in best corrected visual acuity measured in Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) letters (range, 0-100 letters, higher scores indicate better vision) and retinal structure.

Results: Between June 2021 and April 2022, 65 participants (32.3% women) were randomly assigned to either UBX1325 (n=32) or sham (n=33). There were four TEAEs of Grade 3 or greater in the sham group, of which three were considered serious, while there were five in the UBX1325 group of Grade 3 or greater and considered serious. There were no apparent between-group differences with respect to vital signs, electrocardiograms, or routine blood chemistries. For the secondary outcome of efficacy, the difference between UBX1325 and sham in mean change to week 48 in best corrected visual acuity was 5.6 more ETDRS letters (95% confidence interval, -1.5 to 12.7).

Conclusions: In this sham-controlled trial there were no TEAEs that led to discontinuation of treatment with UBX1325 compared with sham. There were trends suggestive of potential efficacy; larger trials are needed to further evaluate these findings. (Funded by UNITY Biotechnology; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04857996.).

抗衰老药物UBX1325治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的安全性和有效性。
背景:我们测试了单次玻璃体内注射foselutoclax(以下简称UBX1325)减轻糖尿病黄斑水肿影响的能力,foselutoclax是一种抗凋亡蛋白b细胞淋巴瘤的新型抗衰老小分子抑制剂。方法:将既往对抗血管内皮生长因子治疗反应不佳的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者随机(1:1)分配到单次玻璃体内注射10 μg UBX1325或假药组,随访48周。主要试验目的是通过眼部和全身治疗出现的不良事件(teae)评估UBX1325的安全性和副作用。我们的次要目标是探讨疗效,定义为UBX1325与假UBX1325在糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)中测量的最佳矫正视力(范围,0-100个字母,分数越高表明视力越好)和视网膜结构的基线平均变化。结果:在2021年6月至2022年4月期间,65名参与者(32.3%的女性)被随机分配到UBX1325 (n=32)或假手术(n=33)。sham组3级及以上teae有4例,其中3例为严重teae, UBX1325组3级及以上teae有5例为严重teae。在生命体征、心电图或常规血液化学方面,组间无明显差异。对于次要疗效指标,UBX1325和sham在48周最佳矫正视力的平均变化上的差异比ETDRS多5.6个字母(95%可信区间,-1.5至12.7)。结论:在这个假对照试验中,与假对照试验相比,没有teae导致UBX1325治疗中断。有提示潜在疗效的趋势;需要更大规模的试验来进一步评估这些发现。(UNITY Biotechnology资助;ClinicalTrials.gov号码:NCT04857996)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信