The Legal Uncertainties of Sociogenomic Polygenic Scores.

Harvard journal of law & technology Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Shawneequa Callier, Anya E R Prince
{"title":"The Legal Uncertainties of Sociogenomic Polygenic Scores.","authors":"Shawneequa Callier, Anya E R Prince","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Genomics may increasingly be used to predict associations with social traits through a new field called sociogenomics. This approach includes developing genetic 'scores' to identify associations with individuals' traits like educational attainment, feelings of loneliness, aggressive behavior, and criminality. Companies are already testing embryos to select for some of these traits, and these scores could be adopted by industries and settings beyond commercialized reproductive genetic testing services. The nature of the scores raises concerns about the potential dangers of a passive regulatory approach. Although supporters argue that sociogenomic polygenic scores could help mediate social inequality, there are worries that their implementation into society could be discriminatory and inequitable. Without adequate safeguards, it could have severe consequences for adults using IVF services, students, health insurance beneficiaries, employees, and others in the future. While existing legal structures are in place to regulate medical genetic information, these protections have their own flaws, and further, do not clearly extend to polygenic scores. Policymakers must therefore consider the potential harms of sociogenomic polygenic scores, and how to maximize any benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":81374,"journal":{"name":"Harvard journal of law & technology","volume":"38 2 Symposium","pages":"553-576"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12074663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard journal of law & technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Genomics may increasingly be used to predict associations with social traits through a new field called sociogenomics. This approach includes developing genetic 'scores' to identify associations with individuals' traits like educational attainment, feelings of loneliness, aggressive behavior, and criminality. Companies are already testing embryos to select for some of these traits, and these scores could be adopted by industries and settings beyond commercialized reproductive genetic testing services. The nature of the scores raises concerns about the potential dangers of a passive regulatory approach. Although supporters argue that sociogenomic polygenic scores could help mediate social inequality, there are worries that their implementation into society could be discriminatory and inequitable. Without adequate safeguards, it could have severe consequences for adults using IVF services, students, health insurance beneficiaries, employees, and others in the future. While existing legal structures are in place to regulate medical genetic information, these protections have their own flaws, and further, do not clearly extend to polygenic scores. Policymakers must therefore consider the potential harms of sociogenomic polygenic scores, and how to maximize any benefits.

社会基因组多基因评分的法律不确定性。
通过一个叫做社会基因组学的新领域,基因组学可能越来越多地用于预测与社会特征的关联。这种方法包括开发基因“分数”,以确定与个人特征的关联,如受教育程度、孤独感、攻击行为和犯罪行为。一些公司已经在对胚胎进行测试,以选择其中的一些特征,这些分数可以被商业生殖基因测试服务以外的行业和机构采用。这些分数的性质引发了人们对被动监管方式潜在危险的担忧。尽管支持者认为,社会基因组多基因评分可以帮助调解社会不平等,但也有人担心,在社会中实施多基因评分可能具有歧视性和不公平。如果没有足够的保障措施,将来可能会对使用试管婴儿服务的成年人、学生、健康保险受益人、雇员和其他人造成严重后果。虽然现有的法律结构是用来规范医学遗传信息的,但这些保护有其自身的缺陷,而且,没有明确地延伸到多基因得分。因此,政策制定者必须考虑社会基因组多基因评分的潜在危害,以及如何最大化其益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信