The symbolic intersecting ableism and racism scale.

IF 1.3 Q3 REHABILITATION
Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fresc.2025.1576357
Carli Friedman
{"title":"The symbolic intersecting ableism and racism scale.","authors":"Carli Friedman","doi":"10.3389/fresc.2025.1576357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Intersectionality recognizes and maps the ways oppressions interact and intersect for multiply marginalized people. This framework is a pushing back against the historical approach to discrimination that has taken a \"single-axis\" view of discrimination, focusing on one single type of oppression, even for people with multiple identities. Little attention has been drawn to intersectionality when it comes to disability, especially related to disability and race.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recognition of the intersectional nature of ableism and racism, the aim of this study was to develop and validate the Symbolic Intersecting Ableism and Racism Scale (SIARS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We piloted the SIARS with 512 people (July-October 2024) and conducted an exploratory factor analysis to examine the underlying structure of the SIARS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SIARS has adequate validity and reliability. Our findings suggest the SIARS is comprised of a complex combination of a denial of continuing discrimination, individualism, and empathy. The findings also indicated many points of contention with the single-axis symbolic ableism scale measure, which examines disability only, further reinforcing the need to measure and attend to intersectionality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Without doing so, we will never truly be able to dismantle oppression and discrimination, including the ableism disabled people face.</p>","PeriodicalId":73102,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","volume":"6 ","pages":"1576357"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067992/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fresc.2025.1576357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Intersectionality recognizes and maps the ways oppressions interact and intersect for multiply marginalized people. This framework is a pushing back against the historical approach to discrimination that has taken a "single-axis" view of discrimination, focusing on one single type of oppression, even for people with multiple identities. Little attention has been drawn to intersectionality when it comes to disability, especially related to disability and race.

Objective: In recognition of the intersectional nature of ableism and racism, the aim of this study was to develop and validate the Symbolic Intersecting Ableism and Racism Scale (SIARS).

Materials and methods: We piloted the SIARS with 512 people (July-October 2024) and conducted an exploratory factor analysis to examine the underlying structure of the SIARS.

Results: The SIARS has adequate validity and reliability. Our findings suggest the SIARS is comprised of a complex combination of a denial of continuing discrimination, individualism, and empathy. The findings also indicated many points of contention with the single-axis symbolic ableism scale measure, which examines disability only, further reinforcing the need to measure and attend to intersectionality.

Conclusion: Without doing so, we will never truly be able to dismantle oppression and discrimination, including the ableism disabled people face.

象征交叉的残疾主义和种族主义尺度。
简介:交叉性识别和绘制压迫相互作用的方式,并为众多边缘化人群交叉。这一框架是对历史上对歧视采取“单轴”观点的一种反击,这种观点只关注一种类型的压迫,即使对具有多种身份的人也是如此。当涉及到残疾,特别是残疾与种族的关系时,很少有人关注交叉性。目的:认识到残疾歧视和种族主义的交叉性质,本研究的目的是开发和验证符号交叉残疾歧视和种族主义量表(SIARS)。材料和方法:我们对512人(2024年7月至10月)进行了SIARS试验,并进行了探索性因素分析,以检查SIARS的潜在结构。结果:SIARS具有足够的效度和信度。我们的研究结果表明,SIARS是由否认持续歧视、个人主义和同理心的复杂组合组成的。调查结果还表明了与单轴象征性残疾量表的许多争论点,该量表只检查残疾,进一步加强了测量和注意交叉性的必要性。结论:不这样做,我们将永远无法真正消除压迫和歧视,包括残疾人面临的残疾歧视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信