Opioid and alcohol use disorder medication availability in outpatient care: national estimates & potential policy levers.

Health affairs scholar Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1093/haschl/qxaf040
Alisa B Busch, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Constance M Horgan, Shelly F Greenfield, Haiden A Huskamp, Sharon Reif
{"title":"Opioid and alcohol use disorder medication availability in outpatient care: national estimates & potential policy levers.","authors":"Alisa B Busch, Sharon-Lise T Normand, Constance M Horgan, Shelly F Greenfield, Haiden A Huskamp, Sharon Reif","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxaf040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medications for opioid and alcohol use disorder (MOUD/MAUD) are efficacious, important components of relapse prevention care, and markedly underused. Yet, not all programs treating substance use disorders (SUD) offer them. Using the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's 2022 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N-SUMHSS), for outpatient programs (excluding opioid treatment programs) that provided \"primarily SUD services\" (SUD) or \"primarily mental health but also SUD services\" (MH/SUD; <i>N</i> = 9921 programs), we identified program characteristics associated with providing MOUD or MAUD, focusing on potential policy levers (state licensure/certification, national organization accreditation) that could increase MOUD/MAUD access. We found that only approximately half (51%) provide MOUD and fewer (45%) provide MAUD. State licensure/certification was negatively associated with providing these medications, while national organization accreditation was positively associated. However, states varied widely in these associations. Additionally, SUD programs were less likely to offer MOUD/MAUD compared with MH/SUD programs. These findings demonstrate missed policy opportunities for states and national accreditation organizations to move SUD care into evidence-based practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":"3 4","pages":"qxaf040"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11979098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxaf040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Medications for opioid and alcohol use disorder (MOUD/MAUD) are efficacious, important components of relapse prevention care, and markedly underused. Yet, not all programs treating substance use disorders (SUD) offer them. Using the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's 2022 National Substance Use and Mental Health Services Survey (N-SUMHSS), for outpatient programs (excluding opioid treatment programs) that provided "primarily SUD services" (SUD) or "primarily mental health but also SUD services" (MH/SUD; N = 9921 programs), we identified program characteristics associated with providing MOUD or MAUD, focusing on potential policy levers (state licensure/certification, national organization accreditation) that could increase MOUD/MAUD access. We found that only approximately half (51%) provide MOUD and fewer (45%) provide MAUD. State licensure/certification was negatively associated with providing these medications, while national organization accreditation was positively associated. However, states varied widely in these associations. Additionally, SUD programs were less likely to offer MOUD/MAUD compared with MH/SUD programs. These findings demonstrate missed policy opportunities for states and national accreditation organizations to move SUD care into evidence-based practice.

门诊护理中阿片类药物和酒精使用障碍药物的可得性:国家估计和潜在的政策杠杆。
阿片类药物和酒精使用障碍(mod /MAUD)药物是有效的,是预防复发护理的重要组成部分,但明显未得到充分利用。然而,并不是所有治疗药物使用障碍(SUD)的项目都提供这些药物。使用药物滥用和心理健康服务管理局的2022年国家物质使用和心理健康服务调查(N-SUMHSS),用于提供“主要是心理健康服务”(SUD)或“主要是心理健康但也有SUD服务”的门诊项目(不包括阿片类药物治疗项目)。N = 9921个项目),我们确定了与提供mod或MAUD相关的项目特征,重点关注可能增加mod /MAUD访问的潜在政策杠杆(国家许可/认证,国家组织认证)。我们发现只有大约一半(51%)提供MAUD,更少(45%)提供MAUD。国家许可/认证与提供这些药物负相关,而国家组织认证与提供这些药物正相关。然而,各州在这些协会中差异很大。此外,与MH/SUD项目相比,SUD项目提供mod /MAUD的可能性较小。这些发现表明,各州和国家认证组织错过了将SUD护理纳入循证实践的政策机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信