Ultrasound-measured cutaneous-epiglottic distance for predicting difficult laryngoscopy: an observational study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Luis Henrique Cangiani , Rodrigo Leal Alves , Glenio B. Mizubuti , Rodrigo Moreira e Lima , Lais Helena Navarro e Lima
{"title":"Ultrasound-measured cutaneous-epiglottic distance for predicting difficult laryngoscopy: an observational study","authors":"Luis Henrique Cangiani ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Leal Alves ,&nbsp;Glenio B. Mizubuti ,&nbsp;Rodrigo Moreira e Lima ,&nbsp;Lais Helena Navarro e Lima","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ultrasound (US) allows for rapid bedside airway assessment. We aimed to evaluate the US-measured cutaneous-epiglottic distance (CED) in predicting difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack-Lehane grades 3‒4). We also evaluated the potential association between CED, sex, patient’s body mass index (BMI), and the independent associations between CED and increased odds for Cormack-Lehane grades 3‒4 (secondary outcomes).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients aged 18‒70 years scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation were included. Those with a BMI &gt; 35 kg.m<sup>-2</sup> and/or previous history of difficult intubation were excluded. CED was measured with patients anesthetized before tracheal intubation. Age, sex, BMI, type of surgery, and number of attempts until successful tracheal intubation were recorded. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate CED’s clinical relevance. Secondary analyses compared the association between CED and BMI in patients with Cormack-Lehane grades 1‒2 versus those with grades 3‒4. The relationship between CED and BMI was assessed using multiple linear regression. Binary logistic regression was employed for predicting Cormack-Lehane grades 3‒4 as a dichotomous outcome with CED and BMI as a covariate.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.899 (p &lt; 0.001). The maximum CED cut-off point (by Youden index) was 25.6 mm. CED and BMI were positively correlated, and both were independently associated with an increased odds for difficult laryngoscopy [odds ratio for CED = 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35‒2.41; BMI = 1.30, 95% CI 1.05‒1.59].</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>US-measured CED has a high discriminatory capability for predicting lower (1‒2) and higher (3‒4) Cormack-Lehane grades during direct laryngoscopy. CED was positively correlated with BMI and was independently associated with higher odds for difficult laryngoscopy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 4","pages":"Article 844637"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Ultrasound (US) allows for rapid bedside airway assessment. We aimed to evaluate the US-measured cutaneous-epiglottic distance (CED) in predicting difficult laryngoscopy (Cormack-Lehane grades 3‒4). We also evaluated the potential association between CED, sex, patient’s body mass index (BMI), and the independent associations between CED and increased odds for Cormack-Lehane grades 3‒4 (secondary outcomes).

Methods

Patients aged 18‒70 years scheduled for elective surgeries under general anesthesia with tracheal intubation were included. Those with a BMI > 35 kg.m-2 and/or previous history of difficult intubation were excluded. CED was measured with patients anesthetized before tracheal intubation. Age, sex, BMI, type of surgery, and number of attempts until successful tracheal intubation were recorded. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate CED’s clinical relevance. Secondary analyses compared the association between CED and BMI in patients with Cormack-Lehane grades 1‒2 versus those with grades 3‒4. The relationship between CED and BMI was assessed using multiple linear regression. Binary logistic regression was employed for predicting Cormack-Lehane grades 3‒4 as a dichotomous outcome with CED and BMI as a covariate.

Results

ROC curve analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.899 (p < 0.001). The maximum CED cut-off point (by Youden index) was 25.6 mm. CED and BMI were positively correlated, and both were independently associated with an increased odds for difficult laryngoscopy [odds ratio for CED = 1.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35‒2.41; BMI = 1.30, 95% CI 1.05‒1.59].

Conclusion

US-measured CED has a high discriminatory capability for predicting lower (1‒2) and higher (3‒4) Cormack-Lehane grades during direct laryngoscopy. CED was positively correlated with BMI and was independently associated with higher odds for difficult laryngoscopy.
评估皮肤-会厌距离超声获得预测困难喉镜在成人患者:一项观察性研究。
背景:超声(US)允许快速床边气道评估。我们的目的是评估美国测量的皮肤-会厌距离(CED)在预测喉镜检查困难中的作用(Cormack-Lehane分级3-4)。我们还评估了CED、性别、患者身体质量指数(BMI)之间的潜在关联,以及CED与Cormack-Lehane分级3-4(次要结局)风险增加之间的独立关联。方法:选取18 ~ 70岁全麻气管插管择期手术患者。体重指数为35公斤的人。排除M-2和/或既往插管困难史。在气管插管前麻醉时测量CED。记录年龄、性别、身体质量指数、手术类型和气管插管成功前的尝试次数。采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析评价CED的临床相关性。二级分析比较了1-2级Cormack-Lehane患者与3-4级患者的CED和BMI之间的关系。使用多元线性回归评估CED与BMI之间的关系。采用二元逻辑回归预测Cormack-Lehane等级3-4为二分类结果,以CED和BMI为协变量。结果:ROC曲线分析显示AUC为0.899 (p < 0.001)。最大CED截断点(约登指数)为25.6 mm。CED和BMI呈正相关,两者都与喉镜检查困难的几率增加独立相关(CED的OR = 1.81,95% CI 1.35-2.41;Bmi = 1.30,95%ci 1.05-1.59)。结论:us测量的CED在直接喉镜检查中预测较低(1-2)和较高(3-4)的Cormack-Lehane分级具有很高的判别能力。CED与BMI呈正相关,并与喉镜检查困难的较高几率独立相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信