A Qualitative Assessment of Interprofessional Knowledge Gaps in the Setting of Child Physical Abuse.

Elizabeth A Cleek, Lynn K Sheets, Joshua P Mersky, Joan P Totka, Kristin A Haglund
{"title":"A Qualitative Assessment of Interprofessional Knowledge Gaps in the Setting of Child Physical Abuse.","authors":"Elizabeth A Cleek, Lynn K Sheets, Joshua P Mersky, Joan P Totka, Kristin A Haglund","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health care professionals can protect children by identifying and reporting injuries concerning for child physical abuse, such as sentinel injuries (bruising and intra-oral injuries in precruising infants). Citing knowledge and collaboration barriers, health care professionals sometimes fail to recognize sentinel injuries as concerning for abuse. Interprofessional education may be an ideal format to improve health care professional's responses to sentinel injuries. However, it is traditionally limited to health care professions, while responding to suspected child physical abuse requires collaboration between health care professionals and non-health care professionals. This study's purpose was to understand if an interprofessional education framework could support the need and development of interprofessional education for child physical abuse beyond health care professions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive methodology. Participants included 27 professionals who had engaged in child physical abuse responses in a US midwestern urban county. Participant professions included health care, child protective services, law enforcement, courts, victim advocates, and child advocacy center employees.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six themes were identified: 4 themes aligned with competencies of the interprofessional education framework, 1 described engaging with families, and 1 described features unique to sentinel injury investigations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study supports the need for child physical abuse interprofessional education beyond health care professions. Legal thresholds for responding to suspected abuse differ by profession, and there is no shared interprofessional language around child physical abuse. This contributes to a steep learning curve for new professionals. This study also supports that an existing interprofessional education framework can provide the foundational framework for development of such education.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":"124 1","pages":"10-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Health care professionals can protect children by identifying and reporting injuries concerning for child physical abuse, such as sentinel injuries (bruising and intra-oral injuries in precruising infants). Citing knowledge and collaboration barriers, health care professionals sometimes fail to recognize sentinel injuries as concerning for abuse. Interprofessional education may be an ideal format to improve health care professional's responses to sentinel injuries. However, it is traditionally limited to health care professions, while responding to suspected child physical abuse requires collaboration between health care professionals and non-health care professionals. This study's purpose was to understand if an interprofessional education framework could support the need and development of interprofessional education for child physical abuse beyond health care professions.

Methods: Data were collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed using a qualitative descriptive methodology. Participants included 27 professionals who had engaged in child physical abuse responses in a US midwestern urban county. Participant professions included health care, child protective services, law enforcement, courts, victim advocates, and child advocacy center employees.

Results: Six themes were identified: 4 themes aligned with competencies of the interprofessional education framework, 1 described engaging with families, and 1 described features unique to sentinel injury investigations.

Conclusions: This study supports the need for child physical abuse interprofessional education beyond health care professions. Legal thresholds for responding to suspected abuse differ by profession, and there is no shared interprofessional language around child physical abuse. This contributes to a steep learning curve for new professionals. This study also supports that an existing interprofessional education framework can provide the foundational framework for development of such education.

儿童身体虐待背景下跨专业知识差距的定性评估。
卫生保健专业人员可以通过识别和报告与儿童身体虐待有关的伤害来保护儿童,例如前哨伤(幼儿的瘀伤和口腔内损伤)。由于知识和协作障碍,卫生保健专业人员有时不能认识到哨点伤害与虐待有关。跨专业教育可能是一个理想的形式,以提高卫生保健专业人员的反应前哨伤害。然而,传统上仅限于卫生保健专业人员,而应对疑似儿童身体虐待需要卫生保健专业人员和非卫生保健专业人员之间的合作。本研究的目的是了解跨专业教育框架是否可以支持卫生保健专业以外的儿童身体虐待跨专业教育的需求和发展。方法:通过半结构化访谈收集数据,并采用定性描述方法进行分析。参与者包括27名在美国中西部城市县从事儿童身体虐待反应的专业人员。参与的职业包括保健、儿童保护服务、执法、法院、受害者维权人士和儿童维权中心员工。结果:确定了六个主题:4个主题与跨专业教育框架的能力相一致,1个描述了与家庭的接触,1个描述了哨点损伤调查的独特特征。结论:本研究支持在卫生保健专业之外开展儿童身体虐待跨专业教育的必要性。对疑似虐待做出反应的法律门槛因职业而异,而且在儿童身体虐待方面也没有共同的跨专业语言。这使得新专业人士的学习曲线变得陡峭。本研究亦支持现有的跨专业教育架构可为跨专业教育的发展提供基础架构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信