Objective skill assessment for cataract surgery from surgical microscope video.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Rebecca Hisey, Henry Lee, Adrienne Duimering, John Liu, Vasudha Gupta, Tamas Ungi, Christine Law, Gabor Fichtinger, Matthew Holden
{"title":"Objective skill assessment for cataract surgery from surgical microscope video.","authors":"Rebecca Hisey, Henry Lee, Adrienne Duimering, John Liu, Vasudha Gupta, Tamas Ungi, Christine Law, Gabor Fichtinger, Matthew Holden","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03366-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Video offers an accessible method for automated surgical skill evaluation; however, many platforms still rely on traditional six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) tracking systems, which can be costly, cumbersome, and challenging to apply clinically. This study aims to demonstrate that trainee skill in cataract surgery can be assessed effectively using only object detection from monocular surgical microscope video.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One ophthalmologist and four residents performed cataract surgery on a simulated eye five times each, generating 25 recordings. Recordings included both the surgical microscope video and 6-DOF instrument tracking data. Videos were graded by two expert ophthalmologists using the ICO-OSCAR:SICS rubric. We computed motion-based metrics using both object detection from video and 6-DOF tracking. We first examined correlations between each metric and expert scores for each rubric criteria. Then, using these findings, we trained an ordinal regression model to predict scores from each tracking modality and compared correlation strengths with expert scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Metrics from object detection generally showed stronger correlations with expert scores than 6-DOF tracking. For score prediction, 6-DOF tracking showed no significant advantage, while scores predicted from object detection achieved significantly stronger correlations with expert scores for four scoring criteria.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results indicate that skill assessment from monocular surgical microscope video can match, and in some cases exceed, the correlation strengths of 6-DOF tracking assessments. This finding supports the feasibility of using object detection for skill assessment without additional hardware.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03366-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Video offers an accessible method for automated surgical skill evaluation; however, many platforms still rely on traditional six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) tracking systems, which can be costly, cumbersome, and challenging to apply clinically. This study aims to demonstrate that trainee skill in cataract surgery can be assessed effectively using only object detection from monocular surgical microscope video.

Methods: One ophthalmologist and four residents performed cataract surgery on a simulated eye five times each, generating 25 recordings. Recordings included both the surgical microscope video and 6-DOF instrument tracking data. Videos were graded by two expert ophthalmologists using the ICO-OSCAR:SICS rubric. We computed motion-based metrics using both object detection from video and 6-DOF tracking. We first examined correlations between each metric and expert scores for each rubric criteria. Then, using these findings, we trained an ordinal regression model to predict scores from each tracking modality and compared correlation strengths with expert scores.

Results: Metrics from object detection generally showed stronger correlations with expert scores than 6-DOF tracking. For score prediction, 6-DOF tracking showed no significant advantage, while scores predicted from object detection achieved significantly stronger correlations with expert scores for four scoring criteria.

Conclusion: Our results indicate that skill assessment from monocular surgical microscope video can match, and in some cases exceed, the correlation strengths of 6-DOF tracking assessments. This finding supports the feasibility of using object detection for skill assessment without additional hardware.

从手术显微镜视频看白内障手术技能的客观评价。
目的:视频为外科手术技能的自动评估提供了一种便捷的方法;然而,许多平台仍然依赖于传统的六自由度(6-DOF)跟踪系统,这种系统既昂贵又笨重,而且在临床应用中具有挑战性。本研究旨在证明仅使用单眼手术显微镜视频的目标检测就可以有效地评估受训者的白内障手术技能。方法:1名眼科医生和4名住院医师分别在模拟眼上进行5次白内障手术,产生25次记录。记录包括手术显微镜视频和6自由度仪器跟踪数据。视频由两位眼科专家使用ICO-OSCAR:SICS评分。我们使用来自视频的物体检测和6自由度跟踪计算基于运动的度量。我们首先检查了每个指标和每个标题标准的专家分数之间的相关性。然后,利用这些发现,我们训练了一个有序回归模型来预测每个跟踪模态的得分,并将相关强度与专家得分进行比较。结果:与6自由度跟踪相比,来自目标检测的指标通常与专家得分表现出更强的相关性。对于分数预测,六自由度跟踪没有显示出显著的优势,而从目标检测预测的分数在四个评分标准上与专家分数的相关性显著增强。结论:我们的研究结果表明,单眼外科显微镜视频的技能评估可以匹配甚至在某些情况下超过六自由度跟踪评估的相关强度。这一发现支持了在没有额外硬件的情况下使用目标检测进行技能评估的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信