Reduced dose direct oral anticoagulants and time-in-therapeutic-range defined warfarin in new-onset atrial fibrillation: a report from the nationwide FinACAF study.

European heart journal open Pub Date : 2025-04-23 eCollection Date: 2025-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf046
Alex Luojus, Mika Lehto, Olli Halminen, Ossi Lehtonen, Mikko Niemi, Konsta Teppo, Jaana Kuoppala, Jari Haukka, Jukka Putaala, Miika Linna, Pirjo Mustonen, Aapo Aro, Juha Hartikainen, Gregory Yoke Hong Lip, Kari Eino Juhani Airaksinen
{"title":"Reduced dose direct oral anticoagulants and time-in-therapeutic-range defined warfarin in new-onset atrial fibrillation: a report from the nationwide FinACAF study.","authors":"Alex Luojus, Mika Lehto, Olli Halminen, Ossi Lehtonen, Mikko Niemi, Konsta Teppo, Jaana Kuoppala, Jari Haukka, Jukka Putaala, Miika Linna, Pirjo Mustonen, Aapo Aro, Juha Hartikainen, Gregory Yoke Hong Lip, Kari Eino Juhani Airaksinen","doi":"10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) at reduced dosage regimens are the first choice of ischaemic stroke (IS) prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and elevated bleeding risk or renal insufficiency. We compared the outcomes of reduced dose DOACs and warfarin.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>We included all new-onset patients with AF in Finland from 2011 to 2018. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for IS, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), bleeding, and mortality were calculated for dabigatran (<i>n</i> = 2 672), rivaroxaban (<i>n</i> = 1 866), apixaban (<i>n</i> = 3 936), and warfarin (<i>n</i> = 43 548). Patients on warfarin were grouped into quartiles by their individual time-in-therapeutic range (TTR), with the second best TTR quartile as a reference group for comparisons. Risk of IS was highest in the low TTR quartiles of warfarin, lowest in the best TTR quartile (0.65 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.83), and did not differ for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with the second best TTR quartile. Risk of ICH was highest in low TTR quartiles of warfarin (HRs 7.20, 5.48-9.46 and 1.91, 1.44-2.55), and was not different in patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Risk of all-cause death and bleeding were lowest in the two best TTR quartiles, and highest in the poorest TTR group. Mortality was higher for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, compared with the second best TTR quartile of warfarin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DOACs with reduced doses are efficient and safe stroke prevention therapy in high-risk patients with AF when compared with warfarin therapy of sufficient TTR. In this comparison, warfarin therapy of excellent TTR-quality was associated with the lowest risk of bleeding and mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":93995,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal open","volume":"5 3","pages":"oeaf046"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066950/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjopen/oeaf046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) at reduced dosage regimens are the first choice of ischaemic stroke (IS) prevention for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and elevated bleeding risk or renal insufficiency. We compared the outcomes of reduced dose DOACs and warfarin.

Methods and results: We included all new-onset patients with AF in Finland from 2011 to 2018. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for IS, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), bleeding, and mortality were calculated for dabigatran (n = 2 672), rivaroxaban (n = 1 866), apixaban (n = 3 936), and warfarin (n = 43 548). Patients on warfarin were grouped into quartiles by their individual time-in-therapeutic range (TTR), with the second best TTR quartile as a reference group for comparisons. Risk of IS was highest in the low TTR quartiles of warfarin, lowest in the best TTR quartile (0.65 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.83), and did not differ for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with the second best TTR quartile. Risk of ICH was highest in low TTR quartiles of warfarin (HRs 7.20, 5.48-9.46 and 1.91, 1.44-2.55), and was not different in patients on dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Risk of all-cause death and bleeding were lowest in the two best TTR quartiles, and highest in the poorest TTR group. Mortality was higher for dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban, compared with the second best TTR quartile of warfarin.

Conclusion: DOACs with reduced doses are efficient and safe stroke prevention therapy in high-risk patients with AF when compared with warfarin therapy of sufficient TTR. In this comparison, warfarin therapy of excellent TTR-quality was associated with the lowest risk of bleeding and mortality.

减少剂量直接口服抗凝剂和华法林治疗新发心房颤动:一份来自全国FinACAF研究的报告
目的:直接口服减量抗凝剂(DOACs)是房颤(AF)和出血风险升高或肾功能不全患者预防缺血性卒中(IS)的首选。我们比较了减少剂量DOACs和华法林的结果。方法和结果:我们纳入了2011年至2018年芬兰所有新发房颤患者。计算达比加群(n = 2 672)、利伐沙班(n = 1 866)、阿哌沙班(n = 3 936)和华法林(n = 43 548)的IS、颅内出血(ICH)、出血和死亡率的校正危险比(hr)。使用华法林的患者按其个体治疗时间范围(TTR)分为四分位数,以第二好的TTR四分位数作为对照组进行比较。华法林低TTR四分位数的IS风险最高,最佳TTR四分位数的IS风险最低(0.65 95%置信区间,0.51-0.83),达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班与第二最佳TTR四分位数相比无差异。华法林低TTR四分位数组脑出血风险最高(hr为7.20,5.48-9.46,hr为1.91,1.44-2.55),达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班组脑出血风险无显著差异。全因死亡和出血的风险在两个最好的TTR四分位数中最低,而在最贫穷的TTR组中最高。达比加群、利伐沙班和阿哌沙班的死亡率高于华法林第二好的TTR四分位数。结论:与足够TTR的华法林治疗相比,减少剂量的doac治疗对高危房颤患者是有效和安全的卒中预防治疗。在这个比较中,优异的trr质量的华法林治疗与最低的出血和死亡风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信